Generative AI in Art and Design Education: A Systematic Review of Tools, Pedagogy, and Collaboration

Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly emerging as a transformative force in art and design education. It not only expands the boundaries of creative expression but is also reshaping traditional teaching models. Tools such as Midjourney, DALL·E, Stable Diffusion, Leonardo, and Firefly are now widely adopted in classrooms and studios, demonstrating formidable capabilities in image generation, visual storytelling, and creative exploration. These technologies empower students to generate high-quality visual works and design sketches at unprecedented speeds, fundamentally altering learning approaches and creative workflows.

However, despite GenAI's growing adoption, related research remains in its infancy. Existing literature predominantly focuses on technical performance or creative potential, with limited systematic comparisons and analyses across different regions, disciplines, and teaching contexts. Concurrently, practical challenges and deeper educational implications have yet to be fully explored. Therefore, comprehensive research is needed to map current developments, unlock AI's untapped potential, and address emerging challenges.

Accordingly, this study categorizes AI's role in education into three core dimensions to establish a systematic analytical framework: First, Generative Tools—emphasizing their function in creating artworks, optimizing techniques, and transforming styles; Second, Pedagogical Methods—focusing on AI's application in interactive learning and instant feedback, integrating it as a pedagogical scaffold; Third, Collaborative Partners—exploring AI's participation in artistic evaluation and its potential for real-time collaborative creation with humans. This three-dimensional framework enables a more comprehensive understanding of generative AI's multifaceted roles and value within higher education in art and design.

Generative AI, Art, Education

1. Amini, H. (2025). AI in Art Education: Innovation, Ethics, and the Future of Creativity. Art and Design Review, 13(02), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2025.132008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bartlett, K. A., & Camba, J. D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Product Design Education: Navigating Concerns of Originality and Ethics. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(5), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, J.-F., Ni, C.-C., Lin, P.-H., & Lin, R. (2024). Designing the Future: A Case Study on Human-AI Co-Innovation. Creative Education, 15(03), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.153028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, L., Song, Y., Guo, J., Sun, L., Childs, P., & Yin, Y. (2025). How generative AI supports human in conceptual design. Design Science, 11, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2025.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. De Silva, D., Jayatilleke, S., El-Ayoubi, M., Issadeen, Z., Moraliyage, H., & Mills, N. (2024). The Human-Centred Design of a Universal Module for Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Tertiary Education Institutions. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 6(2), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/make6020051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fan, X., & Li, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interactive Learning Methods for Enhancing Art and Design Education in Higher Institutions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2225907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fang, F., & Jiang, X. (2024). The Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Digital Technology in Art Education under the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 12(February), 22928–22937. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3363655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fareed, M. W., Bou Nassif, A., & Nofal, E. (2024). Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence Image Generators for Educating the History of Architecture. Heritage, 7(3), 1727–1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7030081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fleischmann, K. (2024). The commodification of creativity: Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in higher education design curriculum. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2427039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hall, J., & Schofield, D. (2025). The Value of Creativity: Human Produced Art vs. AI-Generated Art. Art and Design Review, 13(01), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2025.131005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hutson, J., Fulcher, B., & Ratican, J. (2024). Enhancing Assessment and Feedback in Game Design Programs: Leveraging Generative AI for Efficient and Meaningful Evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 2024(22). https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.11038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). Graphic Design Education in the Era of Text-to-Image Generation: Transitioning to Contents Creator. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 44(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12558 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jiang, Y., Tao, Y., Han, K., wang, zuyao, & Zhu, Y. (2025). Impact of AI-generated imagery on foundation course design in industrial design education: An empirical study of curriculum value transformation. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 0(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251364457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kang, W., Lee, H. S., & Hong, J. H. (2025). AI-assisted design communication in ceramic-crafts education: Investigating image generation tools for concept representation and pedagogical practice. Computers and Education, 239(July), 105419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kondo, K., Nagayoshi, H., Nagata, M., & Kanebako, J. (2024). Analysis of AI Prompts for Introductory Education in Generative Art. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 28(2), 213–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lacey, M. M., & Smith, D. P. (2023). Teaching and assessment of the future today: higher education and AI. Microbiology Australia, 44(3), 124–126. https://doi.org/10.1071/MA23036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lataifeh, M., Carrasco, X. A., Elnagar, A. M., Ahmed, N., & Junejo, I. (2024). Human–machine co-creation: a complementary cognitive approach to creative character design process using GANs. Journal of Supercomputing, 80(11), 16574–16610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06083-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, J., & Suh, S. (2024). AI Technology Integrated Education Model for Empowering Fashion Design Ideation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liu, H., Zhang, X., Zhou, J., Shou, Y., Yin, Y., & Chai, C. (2024). Cognitive styles and design performances in conceptual design collaboration with GenAI. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 35, Issue 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09937-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lyu, Y., Shi, M., Zhang, Y., & Lin, R. (2024). From Image to Imagination: Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Cultural Translation in Jewelry Design. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Magee, M. D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Jewelry Design. FEATURE ARTICLES GENERATIVE, 60(3), 330–347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sáez-Velasco, S., Alaguero-Rodríguez, M., Delgado-Benito, V., & Rodríguez-Cano, S. (2024a). Analysing the Impact of Generative AI in Arts Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective of Educators and Students in Higher Education. Informatics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11020037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sáez-Velasco, S., Alaguero-Rodríguez, M., Delgado-Benito, V., & Rodríguez-Cano, S. (2024b). Analysing the Impact of Generative AI in Arts Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective of Educators and Students in Higher Education. Informatics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11020037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Su, H., & Mokmin, N. A. M. (2024). Unveiling the Canvas: Sustainable Integration of AI in Visual Art Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Xie, H., & Zhao, Z. (2025). The analysis of entrepreneurship evaluation system for talent cultivation in artistic creativity and animation under artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01437-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhu, W., Xing, W., Kim, E. M., Li, C., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Zhu, W., Xing, W., Kim, E. M., Li, C., & Wang, Y. (2025). Integrating image-generative AI into conceptual design in computer-aided design education Integrating image-generative AI into conceptual design in computer-aided design education : Exploring student perceptions , prompt behaviors , and artifact creativit. Educational Technology & Society, 19. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
• Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
• Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
• Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder