00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

“Enhancing Fraud Detection in Core Banking Systems Through Risk-Based Internal Controls and Forensic Auditing”

Authors

Dr. Shailendrasingh Dikit

Assistant Professor-Chhatrapati Shahu Institute of Business Education and Research, Kolhapur(Maharashtra) India. (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600295

Subject Category: ecosystems

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 3963-3965

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-04

Published: 2026-08-04

Abstract

The proliferation of Core Banking Systems (CBS), digital banking, cloud computing and real-time payment platforms has made financial fraud more sophisticated. Current fraud detection techniques are not effective anymore against new cyber assaults and complex financial crimes. This paper discusses the role of forensic auditing, risk-based internal controls and emerging technologies in enhancing fraud prevention in commercial banks. It discusses the application of forensic auditing with a combination of digital forensics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, behavioural analytics, blockchain, and continuous auditing to improve fraud detection, fraud investigation, and regulatory compliance. The study also discusses contemporary issues in banking fraud such as insider threats, data privacy, legacy system integration, and regulatory requirements and suggests strategic measures to enhance fraud resilience. The findings indicate that the implementation of intelligent technologies with strong governance and forensic auditing mechanisms enable proactive fraud management, strengthen operational resilience, protect customer assets, and build trust in digital banking ecosystems.

Keywords

Core Banking Systems (CBS), Forensic Auditing, Financial Fraud Detection, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Blockchain Technology

Downloads

References

1. Abdullahi, R., Mansor, N., & Nuhu, M. S. (2020). Fraud prevention initiatives in the banking sector: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1255–1272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. ACFE. (2020). Report to the Nations: Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. ACFE. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adesina, K., Erin, O. A., Ajetunmobi, O., Ilogho, S., & Asiriuwa, O. (2020). Does forensic audit influence fraud control? Evidence from Nigerian deposit money banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(2).2020.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Akinbowale, O. E., Mashigo, P., & Zerihun, M. F. (2023). The integration of forensic accounting and big data technology frameworks for internal fraud mitigation in the banking industry. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2163560. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2163560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Al Naqvi, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence for Audit, Forensic Accounting, and Valuation. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alles, M. G. (2021). Continuous auditing and continuous monitoring: The evolving role of internal audit. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 18(2), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and analytics in auditing: Current trends and future opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 35(4), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2021). Principles for Operational Resilience. Bank for International Settlements. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk. Bank for International Settlements. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Brazel, J. F., Carpenter, T., Gimbar, C., Jenkins, J. G., & Jones, K. L. (2024). Recent research on the identification, assessment, and response to fraud risks: Implications for audit practice and future research. Accounting Horizons, 38(3), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. COSO. (2020). Fraud Risk Management Guide. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Deloitte. (2022). Global Financial Crime Survey. Deloitte Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Deloitte. (2023). Banking and Capital Markets Outlook. Deloitte Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. EY. (2022). Global Integrity Report. Ernst & Young. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. EY. (2024). Global Forensic Data Analytics Survey. Ernst & Young. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gotelaere, S., & Paoli, L. (2025). Prevention and control of financial fraud: A scoping review. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 31, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09532-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Huamán, C. B., De la Cruz-Montoya, D., Gutierrez-Cuadros, J., Pilco Labajos, S., & Lopez-Almeida, M. (2025). Financial auditing as an effective tool for fraud detection: A systematic review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(9), 523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. IIA. (2020). The Three Lines Model. Institute of Internal Auditors. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Institute of Internal Auditors. (2024). Global Internal Audit Standards. Institute of Internal Auditors. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. ISACA. (2022). COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. KPMG. (2021). Global Banking Fraud Survey. KPMG International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. KPMG. (2023). Global Banking Risk Outlook. KPMG International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Liu, Q., Singh, S., & Terzi, E. (2022). Machine learning approaches for financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Expert Systems with Applications, 202, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Moffitt, K. C., Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2021). Robotic process automation for auditing and fraud detection. Journal of Information Systems, 35(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. PwC. (2020). Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2020. PricewaterhouseCoopers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. PwC. (2022). Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2022. PricewaterhouseCoopers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. PwC. (2024). Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2024. PricewaterhouseCoopers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Richins, G., Stapleton, A., Stratopoulos, T., & Wong, C. (2021). Big data analytics in auditing and fraud detection. Journal of Information Systems, 35(1), 63–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rittenberg, L. E., & Johnstone, K. M. (2021). Auditing: A Business Risk Approach (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Soni, L., & Mangala, D. (2025). Preventing and detecting internal fraud risk: A critical analysis of the anti-fraud tools used by the Indian banking industry. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 28(2), 424–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Vasarhelyi, M. A., Kogan, A., & Tuttle, B. (2021). Big data analytics in accounting and auditing. Accounting Horizons, 35(3), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. World Economic Forum. (2023). Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2023. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Economic Forum. (2024). Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2024. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zhang, Y., Xie, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Deep learning techniques for financial fraud detection: A survey. IEEE Access, 9, 152248–152269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zhou, Y., Kapoor, G., & Piramuthu, S. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for fraud detection in financial institutions. Decision Support Systems, 158, 113790. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.