“Emerging Occupational Risks in a Pharmaceutical Company Under Industry 4.0: An Assessment Using TICHNER and HIRAC Tools”

Abstract: The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector aligns with broader industrial objectives, aiming to enhance productivity and adaptability while meeting challenging standards for product quality and diversity while maximizing efficiency. However, this shift is not risk-free. This particularly concerns the well-being of workers which is one of the top concerns shared by manufacturers. As the industry navigates this transition, it is imperative to prioritize the safety of personnel. The rapid pace of technological innovation within pharmaceutical manufacturing carries significant implications, introducing new and emerging risks. Consequently, proactive identification and assessment of these potential threats are essential to effectively mitigate their impact and ensure preparedness for forthcoming changes. To address this gap, this study provides an approach for identifying potential sources and significant factors contributing to its increasing risks in implementing Industry 4.0 in manufacturing industries. This set of sources and factors was evaluated in a medium-sized pharmaceutical manufacturing company aided by TICHNER and HIRAC Tools through a mixed-method approach. The combination of these tools facilitates the identification, characterization, and analysis of new and emerging risks associated with Industry 4.0 implementation. The findings of the study showed that Psychosocial Hazards and Work Experience/ Knowledge are the most common potential sources of Psychological Risks, Unemployment, and Need for Qualified Workers. The approach will allow manufacturers to proactively manage the new and emerging challenges brought by Industry 4.0 and safeguard the well-being of the workforce.

Industry 4.0, Pharmaceutical, Manufacturing, Health, Risk Assessment

1. Kumar, S. H., Talasila, D., Gowrav, M. P., & Gangadharappa, H. V. (2020). Adaptations of Pharma 4.0 from Industry 4.0. Drug Invention Today, 14(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Reinhardt, I. C., Oliveira, J. C., & Ring, D. T. (2020). Current perspectives on the development of industry 4.0 in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 18, 100131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Popkova, E. G., Ragulina, Y. V., & Bogoviz, A. V. (2019). Fundamental differences of transition to industry 4.0 from previous industrial revolutions. In Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century (pp. 21-29). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Thomas, P., & Nicholas, D. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Shaping New Era. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 17-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Min, J., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Jang, T. W., Kim, I., & Song, J. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution and its impact on occupational health and safety, worker's compensation and labor conditions. Safety and health at work, 10(4), 400-408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arden, N. S., Fisher, A. C., Tyner, K., Lawrence, X. Y., Lee, S. L., & Kopcha, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 for pharmaceutical manufacturing: Preparing for the smart factories of the future. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 602, 120554. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zorzenon, R., Lizarelli, F. L., & Daniel, B. D. A. (2022). What is the potential impact of industry 4.0 on health and safety at work? Safety Science, 153, 105802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Leso, V., Fontana, L., & Iavicoli, I. (2018). The occupational health and safety dimension of Industry 4.0. La Medicina del lavoro, 109(5), 327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://kpmg.com/ph/en/home/insights/2019/02/philippines-pharma-all-set-for-continuous-growth.html (Accessed: Decem b er 20, 2023 12:17 am) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Magnavita, N., & Chirico, F. (2020). New and emerging risk factors in occupational health. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 8906. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Arana-Landín, G., Laskurain-Iturbe, I., Iturrate, M., & Landeta-Manzano, B. (2023). Assessing the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on occupational health and safety. Heliyon, 9(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2011). Safety and health at work: A vision for sustainable prevention. Geneva: ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Benson, C., Dimopoulos, C., Argyropoulos, C. D., Mikellidou, C. V., & Boustras, G. (2021). Assessing the common occupational health hazards and their health risks among oil and gas workers. Safety science, 140, 105284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Marmot, M., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2005). Social Determinants of Health. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). "Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation." Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347-358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (1999). "Stress at Work." NIOSH Publication No. 99-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tarafdar, M., et al. (2015). Examining the impact of technostress on productivity: A longitudinal study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(3), 366-376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ferrie, J. E., et al. (2016). Job insecurity and health: A meta-analytical review of prospective studies. BMJ Open, 6(2), e010085. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Eurofound. (2020). Working conditions in the European Union: Manufacturing. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Golden, T. D., & Eddleston, K. A. (2020). Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. Journal of vocational behavior, 116, 103348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Flaspöler, E., Reinert, D., Brun E., 2005. Expert Forecast on Emerging Physical Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health. EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work), Luxembourg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Brun, E., Beeck, R.O.,Van Herpe, S., Isotalo, L., Laamanen, I., Blotière, O., Mur, J.M., Orthen, B., Wagne, R.E., Flaspöler E., Reinert, D., et al., 2007a. Expert Forecast on Emerging Biological Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health. EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work), Luxembourg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Brun, E., Milczarek, M., Roskams, N., Op De Beeck, R., Pahkin, K., Berthet, M., Morvan, E., Kuhn, K., Kaluz, S., Hupke, M. et al., 2007b. Expert Forecast on Emerging Psychosocial Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Brun, E., Op de Beeck, R., Van Herpe, S., Isotalo, L., Laamanen, I., Blotiere, C., Mur, J.M., Orthen, B.,Wagner, E., Flaspöler, E. et al., 2009. Expert Forecast on Emerging Chemical Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health. EU- OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work), Luxembourg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Brocal, F., Sebastia´n, M.A., Gonza´lez, C., 2017. Theoretical framework for the new and emerging occupational risk modeling and its monitoring through technology lifecycle of industrial processes. Safety Science 99, 178e186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Brocal, F., Gonza´lez, C., Sebastia´n, M.A., 2018. Technique to identify and characterize new and emerging risks: a new tool for application in manufacturing processes. Submitted to Journal Safety Science, 109, 2018, 144e156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Brocal, F., Sebastián, M. A., & González, C. (2019). Advanced manufacturing processes and technologies. In Management of Emerging Public Health Issues and Risks (pp. 31-64). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fernández, F. B., & Pérez, M. Á. S. (2015). Analysis and modeling of new and emerging occupational risks in the context of advanced manufacturing processes. Procedia Engineering, 100, 1150-1159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Faisal, K., Rathnayaka, S., Ahmed, S., 2015. Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 98, 116–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Raafat, H. M. N. (1989). Risk assessment and machinery safety. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 11, 37-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Suhardi, B., Estianto, A. A. V., & Laksono, P. W. (2016, October). Analysis of potential work accidents using hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control (HIRARC) method. In 2016 2nd International Conference of Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical, and Chemical Engineering (ICIMECE) (pp. 196-200). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shaleh, M. K., & Leman, A. M. (2016). Systematic approach for hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control (HIRARC) in workplace according to DOSH guidelines. In International Graduate Conference on Engineering, Science and Humanities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Altenbach, T. J. (1995). A comparison of risk assessment techniques from qualitative to quantitative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Embrey, D. (2004). Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of human error in risk assessment. Human factors for engineers, 2, 151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Coleman, M. E., & Marks, H. M. (1999). Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment. Food Control, 10(4-5), 289-297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Baek, S. U., Yoon, J. H., & Won, J. U. (2022). Association between Workers’ Anxiety over Technological Automation and Sleep Disturbance: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(16), 10051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Barroga, K. D., Wabina, V. E. R., & Sales, A. C. (2021). Level of Awareness of Smart Manufacturing Technologies and its Nexus to Adoption among Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science, 150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Erebak, S., & Turgut, T. (2021). Anxiety about the speed of technological development: Effects on job insecurity, time estimation, and automation level preference. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 32(2), 100419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nzioka, J., & Njuguna, R. K. (2017). The impact of training on employee job satisfaction and work motivation in hotels in Kenya. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 4(2), 209-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Wilson, H. J., Daugherty, P. R., & Morini-Bianzino, N. (2017). "Preparing for the Future of Work: Addressing the Impact of Automation on Workforce Anxiety." Harvard Business Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Use of Truth Table, Logical Reasoning and Logic Gate in Teaching and Learning Process
• Resume Screening App using AI
• Entrepreneurship and STEM Competencies Education Among Female Estate Management Students of Polytechnics
• Sorensen Trust Based and Invasive Weed Algorithm Based Wireless Sensor Network Optimization
• Design and Construction of a Smart Energy Theft Detector on Distribution Lines