Assessment of Commercial Bus Service Quality, Travel Characteristics, and Commuter Satisfaction in Abuja, Nigeria
Authors
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022, Nasarawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022, Nasarawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022, Nasarawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.151000031
Subject Category: Urban Planning
Volume/Issue: 15/10 | Page No: 373-385
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-12
Accepted: 2026-10-17
Published: 2026-10-31
Abstract
Commercial bus transportation plays a vital role in urban mobility in Abuja, Nigeria; however, concerns regarding service quality and operational efficiency persist. This study assessed commuters’ travel characteristics, perceptions of service quality, and variations in waiting and travel times across major commercial bus terminals in Abuja. A questionnaire survey was administered to 383 commuters, and the data were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, and one-way ANOVA. The findings revealed that 46.48% of commuters used bus terminals daily, while 43.6% travelled primarily for work-related purposes. Most respondents (60.1%) paid between ₦500 and ₦1,000 per trip, and 76.3% experienced delays frequently or very frequently. The overall mean score for service quality was 2.14, indicating general dissatisfaction with commercial bus services. The poorest-rated attributes were overcrowding (M = 1.33), seating availability (M = 1.53), ventilation (M = 1.59), and route information (M = 1.59). In contrast, drivers’ politeness (M = 2.94) and safe driving (M = 2.81) received relatively favourable ratings. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in waiting times between peak and off-peak periods (t(104) = 5.039, p = .001). Travel times also differed significantly among terminals (F(7,375) = 8.196, p < .001), with Nyanya recording the longest trips. The study concludes that improvements in reliability, passenger comfort, and terminal infrastructure are necessary to enhance public transport performance and commuter satisfaction in Abuja
Keywords
Commercial bus services; Commuter perception; Service quality; Travel time; Abuja.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Abubakar, I., & Aina, Y. A. (2023). Urban mobility challenges and public transport sustainability in African cities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 19, 100820. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Acheampong, R. A. (2021). Spatial planning and sustainable urban mobility in sub-Saharan Africa. Transport Policy, 112, 155-164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Acheampong, R. A. (2021). Spatial planning and sustainable urban mobility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Transport Policy, 112, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Acheampong, R. A., Siiba, A., & Okyere, D. K. (2023). Urban growth, commuting patterns, and transportation sustainability in African cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 108, 103555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Adeniji, K., & Obikaeze, C. (2022). Public transport service quality assessment in Nigerian cities. Journal of Urban Mobility, 4, 100049. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Adeniji, K., & Obikaeze, C. (2022). Public transport service quality assessment in Nigerian cities. Journal of Urban Mobility, 4, 100049. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Agyemang, F. S. K., Baffour-Awuah, D., & Aidoo, E. N. (2022). Public transport dependency and urban mobility in developing countries. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2238-2247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cats, O., West, J., & Eliasson, J. (2022). A review of public transport information systems and passenger behaviour. Transport Reviews, 42(6), 742-763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ceder, A. (2021). Public transit planning and operation: Modeling, practice and behavior (2nd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2021). Understanding public transport demand and service provision. Research in Transportation Economics, 89, 100973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2021). Understanding public transport demand and service provision. Research in Transportation Economics, 89, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. De Vos, J. (2023). The impact of travel conditions on subjective well-being and transport satisfaction. Transportation Research Part F, 93, 324-336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. De Vos, J. (2023). The impact of travel conditions on subjective well-being and transport satisfaction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 93, 324-336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.01.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2022). Service quality factors affecting customer satisfaction in public transport systems: A review. Transport Policy, 119, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Guzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., & Rivera, C. (2023). Transportation disadvantage and commuting burden among urban workers. Journal of Transport Geography, 107, 103523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Jain, D., Tiwari, G., & Jain, S. (2022). Commuting behaviour and urban transport demand in developing cities. Travel Behaviour and Society, 28, 222-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jain, D., Tiwari, G., & Jain, S. (2022). Commuting behaviour and urban transport demand in developing cities. Travel Behaviour and Society, 28, 222-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lättman, K., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. E. (2021). Perceived accessibility and travel satisfaction among public transport users. Transportation Research Part A, 145, 188-202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lättman, K., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. E. (2021). Perceived accessibility and travel satisfaction among public transport users. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 145, 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Litman, T. (2023). Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transportation planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E., & Guzman, A. (2022). Transport poverty and access to opportunities. Transport Reviews, 42(3), 293-314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E., & Guzman, A. (2022). Transport poverty and access to opportunities: A narrative review. Transport Reviews, 42(3), 293-314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1871737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Oyesiku, K. O., & Olujimi, J. A. B. (2021). Urban transportation challenges and sustainable mobility in Nigerian cities. Journal of Transport and Logistics Studies, 7(2), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Pereira, R. H. M., Karner, A., & Schwanen, T. (2023). Transport accessibility inequalities and social inclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 106, 103495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Pereira, R. H. M., Karner, A., & Schwanen, T. (2023). Transport accessibility inequalities and social inclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 106, 103495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Salahuddin, M., Rahman, M., & Karim, R. (2023). Public transport use patterns in rapidly growing urban centres. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 11, 101002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Salahuddin, M., Rahman, M., & Karim, R. (2023). Public transport use patterns in rapidly growing urban centres. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 11, 101002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Tirachini, A., & Cats, O. (2020). COVID-19 and public transportation: Current assessment and future perspectives. Journal of Public Transportation, 22(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Tirachini, A., & Cats, O. (2020). COVID-19 and public transportation: Current assessment, prospects, and research needs. Journal of Public Transportation, 22(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2021). Crowding in public transport systems: Effects on users and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A, 145, 93-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2021). Crowding in public transport systems: Effects on users, operation, and implications for the estimation of demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 145, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. United Nations. (2023). Disability and sustainable urban mobility: Inclusive transport policies and practices. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. van Oort, N., Sparing, D., & Brands, T. (2023). Reliability in public transport operations and passenger experience. Transport Reviews, 43(5), 623-644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. van Oort, N., Sparing, D., & Brands, T. (2023). Reliability in public transport operations and passenger experience. Transport Reviews, 43(5), 623-644. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2153814 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Wardman, M. (2022). Public transport values of time and service quality valuations: Recent evidence and implications. Transport Policy, 118, 161-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Wardman, M. (2022). Public transport values of time and service quality valuations: Recent evidence and implications. Transport Policy, 118, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. World Bank. (2022). Harnessing urbanization for sustainable and resilient transport systems in Africa. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0