Spatial Distribution, Physical Condition, and Governance Challenges of Urban Parks and Gardens in Abuja, Nigeria
Authors
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022, Nasarawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Federal University Lokoja, Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, PMB 1022, Nasarawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900127
Subject Category: Urban Planning
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 2628-2643
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Accepted: 2026-10-05
Published: 2026-10-19
Abstract
Urban parks and gardens are essential components of urban green infrastructure, contributing to environmental sustainability, recreation, and improved quality of life. This study assessed the spatial distribution, physical condition, development factors, management challenges, and institutional governance of parks and gardens in Wuse and Maitama Districts of Abuja, Nigeria. A mixed-methods approach involving Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, field observations, questionnaire surveys, Relative Importance Index (RII) analysis, and key informant interviews was employed. Data were collected from 384 respondents, while all identified parks and gardens were subjected to physical assessment. The study identified 13 public parks and gardens covering a total area of 177.78 ha. Wuse District contained 69.2% (9) of the facilities, whereas Maitama accounted for 73.8% (131.21 ha) of the total green space area. The IBB Golf Course (95.37 ha) and Millennium Park (24.80 ha) together represented 67.6% of total green space coverage. Physical condition scores ranged from 2.91 to 4.91, with 30.8% of facilities rated Very Good, 46.2% Good, and 23.0% Fair. Funding availability (RII = 0.872) and maintenance funding (RII = 0.865) were identified as the most significant factors influencing park development and management, respectively. The study concludes that despite an extensive green space network, governance, funding, and institutional coordination challenges constrain sustainable park management. Strengthening funding mechanisms, institutional capacity, and monitoring systems is essential for improving urban green infrastructure sustainability in Abuja.
Keywords
urban parks, green infrastructure, park management and governance, institutional framework
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Campbell, L. K., Svendsen, E. S., Johnson, M. L., & Plitt, S. (2022). Not by trees alone: Centering community in urban forestry. Landscape and Urban Planning, 224, 104445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Dong, W., Xu, P. Y., An, B. W., & Guo, Q. P. (2024). Urban green infrastructure: Bridging biodiversity conservation and sustainable urban development through adaptive management approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12, Article 1440477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1440477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Kabisch, N., Haase, D., & Fink, H. S. (2022). Urban green space availability, accessibility and environmental justice: Recent advances and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 223, 104417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Konijnendijk, C. C. (2023). Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: Introducing the 3-30-300 rule. Journal of Forestry Research, 34(3), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01523-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Lau, K. K. L., Yung, C. C. Y., & Tan, Z. (2021). Usage and perception of urban green space of older adults in the high-density city of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Pauleit, S., Hansen, R., & Pribadi, D. O. (2021). Editorial: Transformative urban greening: Advancing green space governance. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, Article 735918. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.735918 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Tang, M., & Li, X. (2024). The disparity of greenness accessibility across major metropolitan areas in the United States from 2013 to 2022. Land, 13(8), 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities. UN-Habitat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Xie, J., Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., & Grove, J. M. (2022). Equity and justice in urban green infrastructure planning: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 224, 104444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Zwierzchowska, I., Hof, A., Iojă, C. I., Mueller, C., Poniży, L., Breuste, J., & Mizgajski, A. (2023). Multi-functional urban green infrastructure and its contribution to sustainable city development. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 83, 127906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0