Development and Usability of RETEPI: An Augmented Reality Module on Image Formation by Spherical Mirrors for Form 4 Physics

This study focuses on the development and usability study of Realiti Terimbuh Pembentukan Imej Cermin Sfera (RETEPI), an Augmented Reality (AR) learning tool designed to assist Form 4 Physics students in visualizing the complex concepts of Image Formation by Spherical Mirrors. Geometric optics is traditionally challenging due to its reliance on abstract, two-dimensional textbook diagrams that often lead to student misconceptions. To address this, a developmental research design was employed, guided by the ADDIE model, utilizing the MAKAR XR platform to transition static diagrams into interactive 3D learning experiences. The research population comprised 108 Form 4 students, of whom 30 were selected through convenience sampling to participate in the field study, while 15 participated in a preliminary pilot study. Expert validation by two experienced Physics teachers demonstrated a high average validity level of 98%, indicating strong expert agreement on the tool's content accuracy and pedagogical suitability. The pilot study confirmed excellent instrument reliability with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.905. The field study assessed the tool’s usability across three constructs: perceived product usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction. Quantitative analysis revealed a high overall mean usability score of 4.28 (SD = 0.709), indicating highly positive student feedback. Specifically, the constructs of usefulness (mean = 4.21), ease of use (mean = 4.31), and satisfaction (mean = 4.31) scored exceptionally well. These findings suggest that students perceive RETEPI as an engaging, user-friendly mobile learning tool that effectively supports their conceptual understanding and simplifies complex optical phenomena. Ultimately, RETEPI serves as a highly promising digital intervention that successfully bridges the gap between abstract physics theory and experiential learning.

Augmented Reality (AR), Physics Education, Spherical Mirrors, ADDIE Model, Conceptual Understanding

1. Abdinejad, M., Talaie, B., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2021). Student perceptions using augmented reality and 3D visualization technologies in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09880-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Astuti, I. A. D., Wibawa, B., & Siregar, E. (2024). The influence of augmented reality (AR)-based learning media in physics learning: A systematic literature review. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 769, 769–778. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-301-6_75 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Elman, J., Yusof, A., Sarudin, A., & Ismail, M. S. (2023). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar digital dalam pembelajaran secara maya semasa pandemik. Isu dalam Pendidikan, 46(1), 12–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Georgiou, Y. (2021). Learning experience design with immersive virtual reality in physics education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3051–3080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10055-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hendri Adi, N., et al. (2025). Augmented reality as an educational tool: A meta-analysis of its impact on student performance. TEM Journal, 14(3), 2271–2284. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM143-32 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Isma, H. I., Subaer, S., Haris, A., & Ramadhan, I. (2024). Development of physics learning media based on augmented reality. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v16i1.362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., & Horan, B. (2020). Enhancing student motivation with use of augmented reality for interactive learning in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 881–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter, 8(2), 3–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mazlan, A. B., & Abdullah, A. F. (2021). BBL-Phyeasycs mengubah persepsi dan sikap pelajar terhadap Fizik. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education (JTVE), 6(2), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Samad, M. R. A., Ihsan, Z. H., & Khalid, F. (2021). The use of mobile learning in teaching and learning session during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies, 1(2), 46–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sholeh, M., Haryanto, Z., & Zulkarnaen, Z. (2024). Development of augmented reality-based physics learning media on magnetic field. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 8(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.8576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Suprapto, N., Ibrohim, H. S., & Mubarok, H. (2021). The use of physics pocketbook based on augmented reality on planetary motion to improve students' learning achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(3), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Thambu, T., & Nadarajan, N. (2024). Kompetensi dan kekangan guru novis dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral di sekolah menengah. Asian Pendidikan, 4(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]