Institutional Conditions Linking Transparency to Anti-Corruption Accountability in the Philippine Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

Transparency reforms are widely used to address corruption, yet disclosure may have limited accountability value when information cannot be accessed, understood, used, or connected to institutional response and enforceable consequences. This systematic literature review examined the institutional conditions shaping the relationship between transparency mechanisms and anti-corruption accountability in the Philippine public sector. Following PRISMA 2020 reporting procedures, the review synthesized 46 publications issued from 2010 to 2026 across public procurement, fiscal disclosure, open government, local administration, digital governance, public health, citizen participation, regulatory governance, and public-sector reform. Qualitative thematic synthesis identified seven interrelated themes: disclosure and access to government information; transparency as an enabling mechanism for accountability; institutional capacity; political discretion, compliance weaknesses, and enforcement constraints; citizen and civil-society monitoring; digital governance; and the gap between formal reform and implementation. Across the included evidence, transparency mechanisms appeared most likely to support accountability when information was timely, reliable, understandable, and usable; when citizens or oversight actors could act on that information; and when public institutions had the capacity, independence, and authority to respond, investigate, correct, or impose consequences. The synthesis therefore indicates that transparency is not equivalent to accountability. Its anti-corruption value is conditioned by the institutional processes that connect disclosure to use, response, oversight, and enforcement.

anti-corruption accountability, digital governance, government transparency, institutional conditions, Philippine public sector, systematic literature review

1. Abuan, O. G., Cruz, R. P., & Deles, E. P. (2025). The task of the educated in combating corruption: A multi-dimensional framework for reform in the Philippines. Advanced International Journal for Research, 6(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.63363/aijfr.2025.v06i05.1373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aceron, J., & Isaac, F. (2016). Going vertical: Citizen-led reform campaigns in the Philippines. Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aceron, J., Aguirre, A., & Crismo, J. (2016). Opening government? The case of the Philippines in the Open Government Partnership. Ateneo School of Government; Global Integrity; Transparency and Accountability Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alampay, E. G. A. (2017). A VSO-Bahaginan framework for active citizenship. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 61(1-2), 71-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Andaya, J. A. G., & Abocejo, F. T. (2019). Implementation of the full disclosure policy (FDP) of Basay municipality, Negros Oriental, Philippines: Status, challenges and sustainability. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 8(7), 404-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Eds.). (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Batalla, E. V. C. (2020). Grand corruption scandals in the Philippines. Public Administration and Policy, 23(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-11-2019-0036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Batalla, E. V. C., Torneo, A. R., & Magno, F. A. (2018). A survey of political interference patterns and modalities in national roadworks in the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 18(3), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2017). Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures and empirical merit. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68, 431-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9695-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Braganza, P. A. T. (2017). Assessment of the implementation of the Plastic Bag Reduction Ordinance in Quezon City (2012-2016). Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 61(1-2), 20-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Canares, M. P. (2014). Opening the local: Full disclosure policy and its impact on local governments in the Philippines. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 89-98). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691214 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Canares, M. P. (2016). Creating the enabling environment for more transparent and better-resourced local governments: A case of e-taxation in the Philippines. Information Technology for Development, 22(Suppl. 1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1121857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Castillo, L. C., & Gabriel, A. G. (2020). Transparency and accountability in the Philippine local government. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3895-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chua, U. C., Santiago, K. L., Ona, I. B. M., Peña, R. M. N., Marasigan, G. Z. S., Delos Reyes, P. G. A., & Samson, B. P. V. (2020). From access to effective use: Open data portals for everyday citizens. In Proceedings of AsianCHI '20 (pp. 61-64). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3391203.3391219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cruz, J. P., Delgra, P., Enriquez, J. M., & Mendoza, R. U. (2018). Governing the golden age of infrastructure: Build, Build, Build through an accountability perspective (ASOG Working Paper No. 18-11). Ateneo School of Government. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3300597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cruz, R. A. B., & Lee, H. J. (2019). Open governance and duality of technology: The open data designer-user disconnect in the Philippines. JeDEM, 11(2), 94-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Drechsler, W. (2017). Public Administration as a scholarly discipline today-and how ICT will affect it. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 61(1-2), 127-141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Franklin, A. L., & Ebdon, C. (2020). Participatory budgeting in the Philippines. Chinese Public Administration Review, 11(1), 60-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Frivaldo, F. S. (2026). Transparency in governance: The influence of open data on public trust in Philippine context. F1000Research, 15, 495. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.178726.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gabiana, K. D. E., Polinar, M. A. N., & Baquero, G. C. H. (2023). The bidding process of the Cebu Provincial Government: A case study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(5), 1456-1466. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gainer, M. (2015). Listening to the public: A citizen scorecard in the Philippines, 2010-2014. Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hernando, C. M. D. (2020). Public accountability in regulatory governance. Journal of Public Affairs and Development, 7, 133-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ilago, S. A. (2017). NPM, business process re-engineering and local governments: The case of local business permitting and licensing system regulatory reform. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 61(1-2), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Imasa, D. A. C., & Campos, K. P. (2025). Issues in Philippine public procurement: A content analysis of Commission on Audit annual audit reports. Community Development Journal, 8(3), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.33086/cdj.v8i3.6577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jesus, J. B., Bonghanoy, C. L., Bueno, N. L. E., Navaja, R. I., Ople-Alviola, C., Bermudez, L. C., Alegre, R. Q., & Patalinghug, D. Y. (2025). Blockchain for transparent governance and public health: A context-sensitive strategic framework for developing nations. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(8), 1583-1593. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jimenez, A. J. A. (2020). Break the corruption chain: The Philippine anti-corruption initiatives. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(8), 1365-1369. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Laut, A. H. L., Mariano, A. A. G., Ontolan, F. E. B., Baracamonte, N. L., Aguado, C. T. N., & Ponce, S. L. (2013). Graft and corruption practices among selected public officials in Mindanao, Southern Philippines. Journal of Government and Politics, 4(2), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2013.0013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lianza, T. S. (2025). Creative accounting and accountability failures in the Philippine health sector: A case study of PhilHealth during COVID-19. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Explorer, 5(3), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.70454/IJMRE.2025.05034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110377602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lombres, C. P. (2020). Streamlining solution for procurement management through automation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Psychology (ICPsy 2019) (pp. 40-48). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009437100400048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Magno, F. A. (2015). Public participation and fiscal transparency in the Philippines. Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Magtalas, A. M. F., Flores, M. J. S., Domingo, R. D., Musa, C. D. B., & Ramos, V. B. (2019). Assessing the transparency practices in public bidding of Philippine Rice Research Institute in the Philippines. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(2), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.7176/PPAR/9-2-06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mangahas, M. (2015). Independent Reporting Mechanism: The Philippines progress report 2013-2015. Open Government Partnership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mantaring, A. V., Espinoza, M. A. P., & Gabriel, A. G. (2019). Complaint management in the public sector organization in the Philippines. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(2), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.7176/PPAR/9-2-03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Medina-Guce, C., & Galindes, A. M. (2017). A review of citizen participation issues, responses, and prospects for reform in local development councils. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 61(1-2), 43-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mendoza, R. U., Bulaong, O. G., Jr., & Mendoza, G. A. S. (2025). Anti-corruption reforms in the Philippines: Quo Vadis? Millennial Asia, 16(3), 364-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996251333209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Navarro, A. M. (2023). The evolution of reforms and the state of competition in public procurement in the Philippines (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2023-48). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/284647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Navarro, A. M., & Tanghal, J. A. O. (2017). The promises and pains in procurement reforms in the Philippines (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2017-16). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/173593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nisnisan, C. A., & Salapa, A. C. (2024). Philippine public procurement challenges - Local government context: A review. TWIST, 19(2), 443-450. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10049652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Noscal, L. A., & Cay, M. K. M. (2025). Implementation and employee adaptability to Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PHILGEPS) in selected municipalities of the fourth district of Laguna. International Journal of Research Publications, 176(1), 120-155. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001761720258257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ocampo, R. B. (2017). Against federalism: Why it will fail and bring us to the brink. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 61(1-2), 106-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Office of the President of the Philippines. (2025). Executive Order No. 94, s. 2025: Creating the Independent Commission for Infrastructure. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ong, D. U., & Gabriel, A. G. (2018). Linking transparency and accountability to local legislative performance in the Province of Nueva Ecija in the Philippines. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(2), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i2.13345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Perante-Calina, L. E. (2015). Citizen’s Charter: An assessment of contributions to frontline service delivery. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 59(1), 34-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reform fails: Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Romero, R. C. (2025). Public participation and transparency: Does open governance promote inclusion and accountability? JeDEM, 17(2), 31-64. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v17i2.963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tan, J., & Lum, C. (2025). Governance through digital platforms: A study of the effectiveness of e-participation on policy transparency in the Philippines. Asian Digital Governance Problems, 2(2), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.71435/685957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Transparency International. (2026). Corruption Perceptions Index 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Vian, T., & Kohler, J. C. (2016). Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA): Pathways to transparency, accountability and access: Cross-case analysis and review of Phase II. Boston University School of Public Health; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Vian, T., Kohler, J. C., Forte, G., & Dimancesco, D. (2017). Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative: Lessons from the Medicines Transparency Alliance. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 10, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-017-0106-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Villamejor-Mendoza, M. F. (2016). Policy reforms to improve the quality of public services in the Philippines. Journal of Politics and Governance, 6(Special Issue), 39-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Yumang, F. M., & Mantillas, C. C. (2025). The procurement process in the barangays of the City of Manila: Examining practices and alternative systems and problems towards a procurement primer. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(4), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Public Governance Quality and Tax Compliance of SMEs in North-East Nigeria
• The Influence of Conflict Resolution on Job Commitment of Non- Teaching Staff in Public Universities in Southwest, Nigeria
• Effect of Curcumin on the Viability and Proliferation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (MDA-MB-231) Cells
• Predicting the Effect of Job Crafting on Employee Innovative Performance: Employee Adaptability as a Mediating Variable