Sustainable and Innovative Framework: Circular Design & Economy Approach for New Product Development
Authors
Research Scholar, Karnavati School of Research, A/907, Uvarsad –Vavol Rd, Uvarsad, (India)
Professor & Research Guide, Karnavati School of Research, A/907, Uvarsad –Vavol Rd, Uvarsad, (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800006
Subject Category: Economy
Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 116-126
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-13
Accepted: 2026-08-18
Published: 2026-08-31
Abstract
Global challenges on environment and impact on overall life cycle and ecosystem, sustainable and innovative solutions are need of the day and this is applicable to New Product development cycle in Automotive Industry. This conceptual research paper focuses light on Circular Economy Innovative approach by integrating New Product Development (NPD) strategies with a focus on the automotive industry. Keeping in mind the necessity ND importance of adherence to environmental regulations, the study takes a deep dive on the theoretical foundations and practical implications of harmonizing NPD processes with CE principles. The paper includes 360-degree facets of the circular economy, emphasizing re-engineering, reusable and restorative approaches that challenges the current linear economic model predominant in the automotive sector. Through an extensive literature review, the research establishes the significance of circular design thinking, closed-loop supply chains, and eco-design principles in the context of NPD. It underscores the imperative for disruptive and sustainable innovation in product development to align with CE goals. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the Indian Automotive Industry's Automotive Mission Plan 2016-26 as a pertinent context for NPD within the circular economy framework. There is a need for substantial change in NPD approach which is connected to change in customer needs, more competitive challenges, rapid growth in India’s automotive sector and most importantly environmental regulations. The theoretical framework developed in this study provides a structured approach to seamlessly integrate CE principles into the NPD process, promoting environmentally conscious and economically viable products. The exploration of the synergy between NPD strategies and CE principles reveals importance of 7Rs of Circular Economy – Refuse, Reduce, Reform, Redesign, Reuse, Recycle, Refurbish. This would ultimately be resulted into achieving desired Time to Market. The study conclude by providing highlights for organisations, professionals, administrators and researchers, revealing the importance of circular economy practices in remoulding NPD process in automotive industry to the innovative and sustainable in long run.
Keywords
Circular Design and Economy, New Product Development, 7Rs, Automotive industry, Eco-design principles
Downloads
References
1. Baines, T., Lightfoot, H., Benedettini, O., & Kay, J. (2007). The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(5), 547–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. HarperCollins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bocken, N. M. P., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bredenhoff, B. (2004). Design for Sustainability: A Step towards Sustainable Product Design. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 4(3-4), 121–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Brezet, H. (2000). Dynamics in Ecological Innovations. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bridgens, B., Elgh, F., & Mark-Herbert, C. (2019). Closing the Loop: The Role of Design in Circular Business Models. Sustainability, 11(20), 5734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, İ. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Charter, M. (2009). Design for environmental sustainability. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Charter, M., & Tischner, U. (2017). Sustainable innovation and design for sustainability: Back to the future. Sustainability, 9(4), 590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Eichner, T., & Pethig, R. (2001). Planned obsolescence as an innovation strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68(1), 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Geissendorf, S., & Pietrulla, M. (2018). Circular Economy and Industrial Symbiosis: From Concept to Practical Implementation. In Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research (pp. 489-500). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gregson, N., Crang, M., Ahamed, F., Akter, N., Ferdous, R., & Ahmed, F. (2015). Doing the dirty work: The global politics of domestic labour. Zed Books Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. H. (2013). Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Back Bay Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jabbour, C. J. C., Ferraz, D. P., & de Oliveira, J. H. C. (2018). Green and circular economy, environmental performance and competitive advantage: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 1080–1092. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Karlsson, R., & Luttropp, C. (2006). EcoDesign: What’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15-16), 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Knight, W., & Jenkins, L. (2009). Eco-innovations: Economic and environmental benefits. Technovation, 29(10), 657–663. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Moreno, M., S. D., Moscatelli, M., Fraj, E., & Smith, T. (2016). On closed-loop supply chain coordination with service level constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Nieuwenhuis, P., Kemp, R., & J. Pearce, J. (2012). Experimenting for Sustainable Mobility: A 'Living Lab' in the Making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Oberle, B., Anderberg, S., Mattsson, L., & O. (2019). Modelling materials flows in the Swedish economy in a global context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Papanek, V., & Lazarus, L. (2005). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Thames & Hudson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Pauli, G. (2010). The Blue Economy: 10 Years, 100 Innovations, 100 Million Jobs. Paradigm Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., & Papadelis, S. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8(11), 1212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Stahel, W. R. (2010). The Performance Economy. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Sundarakani, B., Barua, M. K., & Mutha, A. (2019). Circular economy in the automotive industry: Practices, challenges, and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Wijkman, A., & Skånberg, K. (2015). The Circular Economy and Benefits for Society. The Club of Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2008). The circular economy: A new development strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Green Human Resource Management and Circular Economy- A Theoretical Review
- The Influence of Service Quality and Local Wisdom on Customer Loyalty in Retail Companies Mediated by Customer Relationship Management
- A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Special Economic Zone Units on the Basis of Employment Generation in Kerala
- Alternative Estimation Techniques for Mitigating Multicollinearity in Macroeconomic Models of Nigerian Economic Growth