When Innovation and Commitment Don’t Pay: Evidence from Moroccan State Owned Enterprises

Purpose: Innovation capability and organizational commitment are widely assumed to enhance organizational performance, yet evidence from state‑owned enterprises (SOEs), especially in developing countries, remains limited. This study examines how innovation capability and two forms of organizational commitment—affective and calculative—relate to financial and social performance in Moroccan public commercial offices (MPCO).
Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model was developed and tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS‑SEM) based on survey data from 140 managers in five major Moroccan SOEs (ONCF, ONDA, ONP, ONEE and ONHYM). Organizational performance was operationalized as a multidimensional construct, distinguishing financial and social performance.
Findings: Contrary to prevailing assumptions, the three hypothesized positive relationships between innovation capability, affective commitment, calculative commitment and overall organizational performance are not supported. At the disaggregated level, innovation capability is positively associated with financial performance but has no significant effect on social performance.
Affective organizational commitment shows a paradoxical pattern: it significantly enhances social performance while simultaneously exerting a significant negative influence on financial performance. Calculative commitment does not display any significant effect on either performance dimension. These results highlight the complex and sometimes conflicting pathways through which internal organizational drivers affect different aspects of SOE performance.
Research limitations/implications: The study focuses on Moroccan SOEs and relies on cross‑sectional, self‑reported data from managers, which may limit generalizability and does not allow for causal inference. Future research should employ longitudinal and mixed‑methods designs and extend the analysis to other national and sectoral contexts.
Practical implications: For policymakers and SOE leaders, the findings underscore that innovation and commitment are not uniformly performance‑enhancing. Strategies should explicitly balance financial and social objectives and be tailored to the specific institutional and bureaucratic constraints of SOEs. Affective commitment can be leveraged to strengthen social outcomes, but without appropriate governance and performance systems it may undermine financial sustainability.
Originality/value: This study challenges the widespread assumption that innovation capability and organizational commitment are universally beneficial. By disentangling financial and social performance in a sample of SOEs in a developing country, it provides novel empirical evidence on the contingent and multidimensional nature of performance drivers in the public enterprise context.

Organizational performance; State-Owned-enterprises; Innovation capability; Organizational commitment JEL classification: 000; O31; D91

1. Abraham, F., Cortina, J. J., & Schmukler, S. L. (2021). The rise of domestic capital markets for corporate financing: Lessons from East Asia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 122, 105987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebawojo, A., & Akindehinde, O. (2017a). Organizational Performance And Growth: The Mediating Role Of Human Asset Accounting In Nigeria Banking Industry. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(01), 24‑29. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2201012429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adebawojo, A., & Akindehinde, O. (2017b). Organizational Performance And Growth: The Mediating Role Of Human Asset Accounting In Nigeria Banking Industry. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(01), 24‑29. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2201012429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adebawojo, Oladipupo Akindehinde, Enyi, Patrick Enyi, & Adebawo Owolabi Olutokunbo. (2015). Human Asset Accounting and Corporate Performance. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(1), 45‑52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahamed, A. J., & Noboa, F. (2022). Interconnectedness of trust-commitment-export performance dimensions: A model of the contingent effect of calculative commitment. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2088461. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2088461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Matari, E., Al-Swidi, A., & Fadzil, F. (2013). The Effect of the Internal Audit and Firm Performance: A proposed Research Framework. International Review of Management and Marketing, 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ang, R., Shao, Z., Liu, C., Yang, C., & Zheng, Q. (2022). The relationship between CSR and financial performance and the moderating effect of ownership structure: Evidence from Chinese heavily polluting listed enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 117‑129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Anwar, G., & Abdullah, N. N. (2021). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performance (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3824689). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3824689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Azzarradi, O., & Fikri, K. (2017). MODES DE CONTRÔLE ET DYNAMIQUE DU CHANGEMENT : CAS DU SECTEUR PUBLIC MAROCAIN. Revue du contrôle, de la comptabilité et de l’audit, 1(2), Article 2. https://revuecca.com/index.php/home/article/view/27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Baier, E., Rammer, C., & Schubert, T. (2015). The Impact of Captive Innovation Offshoring on the Effectiveness of Organizational Adaptation. Journal of International Management, 21(2), 150‑165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2015.03.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Benkirane, K., & Benazzi, K. (2023). The role of leader’s social intelligence on firms’ organizational ambidexterity : Literature review. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 4(6‑1), Article 6‑1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10440159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Wang, H. (Helen). (2019). Is privatization a socially responsible reform? Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 129‑151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bouguerra, A., Mellahi, K., Glaister, K., Sadeghi, A., Temouri, Y., & Tatoglu, E. (2022). Absorptive capacity and organizational performance in an emerging market context : Evidence from the banking industry in Turkey. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1575‑1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bradshaw, M., Liao, G., & Ma, M. (Shuai). (2019). Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major Shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2), 255‑277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Castelnovo, P. (2022). Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises : A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 62, 98‑113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.05.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cheung, Z., Aalto, E., & Nevalainen, P. (2020). Institutional Logics and the Internationalization of a State-Owned Enterprise : Evaluation of International Venture Opportunities by Telecom Finland 1987–1998. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Delobbe, N., Herrbach, O., Lacaze, D., & Mignonac, K. (2005). Comportement organisationnel - Vol. 1 : Contrat psychologique, émotions au travail, socialisation organisationnelle. De Boeck Supérieur. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Durand, A. (2010). Impact du co-alignement entre l’orientation CRM et le déploiement technologique sur la performance organisationnelle : Proposition et test d’un modèle de recherche [These de doctorat, Lyon 3]. https://theses.fr/2010LYO31057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. El-Azzouzi, S.-E., Akioud, M., & Radi, A. (2024). L’Implication Organisationnelle comme Catalyseur de la Performance Financière : Une Investigation dans le Milieu des Entreprises Textiles Marocaines. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management (JEFM), 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10593914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Elleuch, W. M., & Affes, H. (2023). Les relations entre l’acquisition des connaissances, la capacité d’absorption et la capacité d’innovation : Une étude empirique sur les entreprises tunisiennes. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion, 6(1), Article 1. https://revue-isg.com/index.php/home/article/view/1207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fan, J. P. H., Huang, J., Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Zhao, M. (2020). Bureaucrats as managers and their roles in corporate diversification. Journal of Corporate Finance, 63, 101171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.03.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Farooq, S., & Radovic Markovic, M. (2016). Modeling Entrepreneurial Education and Entrepreneurial Skills as Antecedents of Intention towards Entrepreneurial Behaviour in Single Mothers : A PLS-SEM Approach. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ferguson, K. L., & Reio, T. G. (2010). Human resource management systems and firm performance. Journal of Management Development, 29(5), 471‑494. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011039231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gajdzik, B., Siwiec, D., Wolniak, R., & Pacana, A. (2024). Approaching open innovation in customization frameworks for product prototypes with emphasis on quality and life cycle assessment (QLCA). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209‑226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gong, Y., Law, K. S., Chang, S., & Xin, K. R. (2009). Human resources management and firm performance : The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 263‑275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R : A Workbook. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Han, S., You, W., & Nan, S. (2019). Zombie firms, external support and corporate environmental responsibility : Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1499‑1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. He, Z.-L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation : An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypo. Organization Science, 15, 481‑494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hottenrott, H., & Peters, B. (2012). Innovative Capability and Financing Constraints for Innovation : More Money, More Innovation? Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1126‑1142. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Jhantasana, C. (2023). Should A Rule of Thumb be used to Calculate PLS-SEM Sample Size. Asia Social Issues, 16, e254658. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.254658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jiang, H., Hu, Y., Su, K., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Do government say-on-pay policies distort managers’ engagement in corporate social responsibility? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 17(2), 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2021.100259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kahiya, E. T. (2020). Context in international business : Entrepreneurial internationalization from a distant small open economy. International Business Review, 29(1), 101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kongrode, J., Ru-Zhue, J., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2023). Exploring the impact of dynamic talent management capability on competitive performance : The mediating roles of dynamic marketing capability of startups. Journal of Competitiveness, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2023.01.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Le, P. T., Harvie, C., Arjomandi, A., & Borthwick, J. (2019). Financial liberalisation, bank ownership type and performance in a transition economy : The case of Vietnam. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lee, E., Walker, M., & Zeng, C. (Colin). (2017). Do Chinese state subsidies affect voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 179‑200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lin, M., Liu, Q., & Li, Z. (2024). Perceived superior trust and organizational commitment among public employees : The mediating role of burnout and the moderating role of public service motivation. Heliyon, 10(3), e24997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations : Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538‑551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Moullin, M. (2017). Improving and evaluating performance with the Public Sector Scorecard. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(4), 442‑458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2015-0092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ogbonnaya, C., & Aryee, S. (2020). HRM Practices, Employee Well-Being, and Organizational Performance. In P. Brough, E. Gardiner, & K. Daniels (Éds.), Handbook on Management and Employment Practices (p. 1‑23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24936-6_17-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Outmane, S. (2021). IMPLICATION ORGANISATIONNELLE ET PERFORMANCE AU TRAVAIL CHEZ LES PROFESSIONNELS DE SANTÉ : L’ÉTUDE D’UN CAS HOSPITALIER. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion, 4(1), Article 1. https://revue-isg.com/index.php/home/article/view/501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ouyang, H., Park, C., & Oh, C. H. (2024). The impact of reverse knowledge transfers on exploitative and exploratory innovations in MNCs : The role of knowledge distance. Journal of Business Research, 179, 114682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual : A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7e éd.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Peterková, J., & Franek, J. (2018). Decision Making Support for Managers In Innovation Management : A PROMETHEE approach. International Journal of Innovation, 6(3), 256‑274. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v6i3.236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research : A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879‑903. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Poppelwell, E., & Overton, J. (2022). Culture, scale and the adaptation of good governance : Insights from SOEs in Samoa and Tonga. World Development Perspectives, 28, 100468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement : Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617‑635. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education : A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 573‑593. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Somwethee, P., Aujirapongpan, S., & Ru-Zhue, J. (2023). The influence of entrepreneurial capability and innovation capability on sustainable organization performance : Evidence of community enterprise in Thailand. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Song, Y. (2022). How do Chinese SMEs enhance technological innovation capability? From the perspective of innovation ecosystem. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(5), 1235‑1254. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2022-0016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Congruence de valeurs et engagement envers l’organisation et le groupe de travail. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10(2), 165‑187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2004.04.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Taleb, T. S. T., Hashim, N., & Zakaria, N. (2023). Mediating effect of innovation capability between entrepreneurial resources and micro business performance. The Bottom Line, 36(1), 77‑100. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-07-2022-0112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Tomo, A. (2019). Bureaucracy, Post-Bureaucracy, or Anarchy? Evidence from the Italian Public Administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(6), 482‑496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1485045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Yang, S., Wang, W., & Ding, T. (2023). Intelligent Transformation and Sustainable Innovation Capability : Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 103963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior : Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279‑1284. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, L., & Yang, M. (2021). Big data and human resource management research : An integrative review and new directions for future research. Journal of Business Research, 133, 34‑50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Zouaghi. (2013). Maturité supply chain des entreprises : Conception d’un modèle d’évaluation et mise en oeuvre [Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur]. Université de Grenoble. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]