Effect of Salinity on Six Genotypes of Avena Sativa during Germination and Seedling Growth
Authors
Niti Kushwaha
Department of Botany, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India (IN)
Shiva Singh
Department of Botany, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India (IN)
Somya Goswami
Department of Botany, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India (IN)
Sharat Srivastava
Department of Chemistry, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India (IN)
Harsh Kumar Garg
Department of Chemistry, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1407000049
Subject Category: Abiotic Stress Management in Plants
Volume/Issue: 14/7 | Page No: 409-413
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-08-05
Published: 2025-08-05
Abstract
Avena sativa is a promising crop valued for its nutritional benefits, adaptability and rapid growth. The rapidly increasing global salinisation threatens more than 10% of arable land, lowering the average yield of major crops. To examine the impact of salinity on seed germination and seedling development in six Avena genotypes (JHO Kent, JHO 822, JHO 851, JHO 2009-1, JHO 2010-1, and JHO 2012-2) subjected to different salinity levels (EC 4, EC 8, EC 12, EC 16 dS/m), including distilled water. The seeds were germinated in petri plates. The germination and seedling vigour were significantly affected by increasing salinity, with notable declines observed at EC 12 and EC 16. Among the genotypes, JHO 822 and JHO 2009-1 displayed the highest salinity tolerance. JHO 822 achieved 90% germination in distilled water at EC 12 and exhibited superior radicle (19 cm) and plumule (20.76 cm) lengths. Similarly, JHO 2009-1 retained 85% germination at EC 16 and exhibited strong seedling growth, with maximum radicle and plumule lengths. JHO Kent, JHO 851, and JHO 2012-2 showed moderate salinity tolerance, attaining germination rates above 75% at EC 16 but with reduced seedling growth metrics. In contrast, JHO 2010-1 demonstrated the lowest resilience, with germination declining to 40% and minimal radicle and plumule development at EC 16. Across all genotypes, lower salinity levels (EC 4 and EC 8) supported optimal germination and growth. Thus, the study highlights substantial genotypic variability in salinity tolerance, with JHO 822 and JHO 2009-1 emerging as promising genotypes for cultivation in saline environments.
Keywords
Avena sativa, salinity, abiotic stress, germination, seedling vigour
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Agarwal, P. K., Shukla, P. S., Gupta, K., & Jha, B. (2013). Bioengineering for salinity tolerance in plants: State of art. Molecular Biotechnology, 54, 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-012-9538-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akbarimoghaddam, H., Galavi, M., Ghanbari, A., & Panjehkeh, N. (2011). Salinity effects on seed germination and seedling growth of bread wheat cultivars. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 9(1), 43–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bayuelo-Jiménez, J. S., Craig, R., & Lynch, J. P. (2002). Salinity tolerance of Phaseolus species during germination and early seedling growth. Crop Science, 42, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bennett, M. D., & Leitch, I. J. (1995). Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Annals of Botany, 76, 113–176. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chauhan, A. N., Nidhi, R., Deepak, K., Ashok, K., & Chaudhry, A. K. (2016). Effect of different salt concentrations on seed germination and seedling growth of different varieties of oat (Avena sativa L.). International Journal of Information Research and Review, 3(7), 2627–2632. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Devi, S., Phogat, D. S., Satpal, & Goyal, V. (2019). Responses of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes under salt stress. International Journal of Current Science, 7(3), 734–737. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fisher, R. A., & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kumawat, S., Kumawat, R., Kumawat, K. R., Gothwal, D. K., & Yadav, S. (2022). Explore salt-tolerant fenugreek genotypes seedlings using salt tolerance index. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(4 Suppl), 1925–1931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kushwaha, N., Dwivedi, K., Choubey, R. N., Malaviya, D. R., Roy, A. K., Anand, A., Baig, M. J., & Kaushal, P. (2002). Germination and seedling vigour of grasses under different levels of salinity. In National Symposium on Grassland and Fodder Research in New Millennium (pp. 26–27). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Malaviya, D. R., Roy, A. K., Anand, A., Choubey, R. N., Baig, M. J., Dwivedi, K., Kushwaha, N., & Kaushal, P. (2019). Salinity tolerance of Panicum maximum genotypes for germination and seedling growth. Range Management and Agroforestry, 40(2), 227–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Roy, A. K., Malaviya, D. R., Anand, A., Choubey, R. N., Baig, M. J., Dwivedi, K., & Kaushal, P. (2021). Salinity tolerance of Avena sativa fodder genotypes (Tolerancia de genotipos de avena forrajera a la salinidad). Tropical Grasslands–Forrajes Tropicales, 9(1), 109–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sánchez-Martín, P. L., Chen, M. K., Pessarakli, M., Hill, H. J., Gore, M. A., & Jenks, M. A. (2014). Effects of temperature and salinity on germination of non-pelleted and pelleted guayule (Parthenium argentatum A. Gray) seeds. Industrial Crops and Products, 55, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Seva Nayak, D., Tyagi, V. C., Gupta, C. K., & Antony, E. (2018). Manual on plant stress physiology. ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Singh, C., Singh, P., & Singh, R. (2003). Modern techniques of raising field crops (2nd ed., pp. 429–436). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Veeral, K. M. D., Sangameshwari, P., & Kalaimathi, P. (2018). Laboratory studies on the effects of different salt concentrations on seed germination. Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/OAJAR-16000158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Villaluenga, C., & Peñas, E. (2017). Health benefits of oats: Current evidence and molecular mechanism. Current Opinion in Food Science, 14, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2017.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Advanced Digital Communication Strategies: A Comprehensive Analysis
- Developing an Explainable AI System for Digital Forensics: Enhancing Trust and Transparency in Flagging Events for Legal Evidence
- The Global Impact of Government Censorship on Women’s Access to Information: A Literature Review
- "Reimagining Higher Education Workspaces: A Review on The Transformative Role of Digital Technology Adoption"
- Improved CSP Efficiency: Innovations and Challenges in Thermal Energy Storage Systems