00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Mechanical Properties of Rattan Cane (Calamus Longipinna)-Filled Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) Composite

Authors

Cyprian Y. Abasi

Department of Chemical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria (NG)

Juliet Gbenowei

Department of Chemical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria (NG)

Oguarabau Benson

Department of Chemical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria (NG)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1401022

Subject Category: Chemical Sciences

Volume/Issue: 14/1 | Page No: 209-215

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-02-17

Published: 2025-02-17

Abstract

This study explored the mechanical properties of both treated and untreated rattan cane (Calamus longippina) integrated with low-density polyethylene (LDPE) composite. The composite was produced by mixing different amounts (5-40 g) of rattan powder, under 180 microns in size, into 40 g of LDPE. The mechanical properties of the treated and untreated composites were analyzed. The tensile strength of LDPE was reduced by 59.36% for untreated composites and 62.56% for treated ones with the addition of rattan cane filler. The elongation at break decreased by 70.82% for untreated and 69.5% for treated composites. The Young's modulus increased by 68.85% for untreated and 69.70% for treated composites as the filler content increased. Impact strength declined with higher filler content by 68.96% for untreated and 69.36% for treated composites. Hardness improved with higher filler content by 57.04% for untreated and 57.36% for treated composites. Flexural strength dropped by 59.33% for untreated and 60.69% for treated composites as filler content increased. The composite's weight loss increased with more filler, reaching a maximum of 3.7% in soil burial tests at 40% filler content. Water absorption rose with more filler, peaking at 13.18% for the 40% filler content. Adding rattan powder enhanced the mechanical properties initially, but further additions led to a decline as LDPE could not effectively transfer the load between fibers. Overall, treated composites showed better mechanical properties compared to untreated ones.

Keywords

Rattan cane, Low Density Polyethylene, Mechanical properties, Filler weight, Treated, Untreated

Downloads

References

1. Ansari, M.N.M & Ismail, H. (2009). Effect of compatibiliser on mechanical properties of feldspar & polypropylene composites. Polym. Plast. Technology. 48(12).1295-1303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ansari, S.A, Paul, E., Sommer, S. & Lieleg, C. (2016). Mediator, TATA-binding protein, and RNA polymerase II contribute to low histone occupancy at active gene promoters in yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 291(19), 9938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Weinstock, J.A. (1983). Rattan: Ecological balance in a borneo rainforest Swidden. Economic Botany, 37(1) 56-68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ismail, H., Muniandy, K. & Othman, N. (2012). Fatigue life, morphological studies, and thermal aging of rattan powder-filled natural rubber composites as a function of filler loading and a silane coupling agent. BioResources, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Muniandy, K., Ismail, H. & Othman, N. (2012). biodegradation, morpholgical, and ftir study of rattan powder-filled natural rubber composites as a function of filler loading and a silane coupling agent. BioResources, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Oladele, I. O. & Okoro, M. A. (2015). Development of rattan (Calamus longipinna) particulate reinforced paper pulp-based composite for structural application using waste papers. Leonardo Journal of Science, 14(27), 75-87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zaini, M. J., Fuad, M. A., Ismail, Z., Mansor, M. S. & Mustafah, J. (1996). The effect of filler content and size on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/oil palm wood flour composites. Polymer International, 40(1), 51-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tajvidi, M. & Ebrahimi, G. (2003). Water uptake and mechanical characteristics of natural filler–polypropylene composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 88(4), 941-946. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Obasi H.C. & Onuegbu G. C. (2013). Biodegradability and mechanical properties of low density polyethylene/waste maize cob flour blends. International journal of Applied science and Engineering Research, 2, (3) 242-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bikiaris, D. & Panayiotu, C. (1998). LDPE/Starch blends compatibilized with PE-g-MA copolymers. Journal of Applied polymer science, 70, 1501-1521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. John and Thomas(2008) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Demir H., Atikler U., Balkose D. & Tihminlioglu, F. (2016). The effect of fibre surface treatment on the tensile and water sorption properties of polypropylene-luffa fibre composites. Composites part A: Applied science and manufacturing, 37(3) 447-456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Yang, H. S., Kim, H. J., Park, H. J., Lee, B. J. & Hwang, T. S. (2006). Water absorption behavior and mechanical properties of lignocellulosic filler–polyolefin bio-composites. Composite structures, 72(4), 429-437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wahab, R., Sulaiman, O., Mustafa, M. T., Sidek, S., & Mat Rasat, M. S (2016). Rattan: Propagation, Properties and Utilization. UMK Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mwaikambo, L. Y., & Ansell, M. P. (2002). Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. Journal of applied polymer science, 84(12), 2222-2234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.