Deep Fracture Mapping and Groundwater Potential Assessment Using Magneto Telluric (MT) Resistivity Imaging in Kilambakkam Region

Abstract: Groundwater exploration in hard rock terrains requires advanced geophysical techniques to identify high-yielding aquifers. This study utilizes Magneto telluric (MT) resistivity imaging to delineate subsurface fracture zones and assess groundwater potential in the Kilambakkam region. The resistivity profiles reveal a complex hydrogeological setting characterized by shallow weathered zones (50m-100m depth) with low water yield, deeper fractured aquifers (120m-250m depth) with moderate yield, and deep-seated fault zones (180m-300m depth) exhibiting high groundwater potential. Two primary borewell target zones have been identified based on low resistivity anomalies (1-6 Ωm), indicating significant water-bearing formations. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating geophysical surveys with hydrogeological data to optimize borewell placement and enhance sustainable groundwater extraction. Further validation through vertical electrical sounding (VES) and pumping tests is recommended to ensure long-term aquifer viability.

Magneto telluric (MT) Resistivity Imaging, Groundwater Exploration, Fracture Zones, Hard Rock Aquifers, Low Resistivity Anomalies, Hydro geophysics, Fault Zones, Kilambakkam

1. Chave, A. D., & Jones, A. G. (2012). The Magnetotelluric Method: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Kumar, D., Singh, V. S., & Mohan, S. (2015). Identification of groundwater potential zones using resistivity imaging and GIS techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1242-1253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Vozoff, K. (1972). The magnetotelluric method in the exploration of sedimentary basins. Geophysics, 37(1), 98-141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. CGWB (2019). Groundwater Resources and Development Prospects in Tamil Nadu. Central Ground Water Board, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Krishnamurthy, N. S., Kumar, D., & Singh, V. S. (2019). Identification of groundwater potential zones in crystalline terrain using geophysical methods. Journal of Environmental Geology, 78(5), 245-256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ramesh, S., Rajendran, K., & Kumaravel, P. (2017). Hydrogeophysical investigation in hard rock terrain using resistivity techniques. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(3), 561-576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sathish, R., Prabhakar, K., & Balasubramanian, A. (2020). Geoelectrical characterization of groundwater in fractured rock aquifers of Tamil Nadu. Geophysical Journal International, 221(2), 1005-1018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ravindran, A. A., Kingston, J. V., & Premshiya, K. H. (2020). Mitigation Dredging in SeabedGeotechnical Engineering Study Using Marine 2D ERI and Textural Characteristics in ThengapattanamHarbour, South India. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01530-z(01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Patriarchy and Gender Roles in Shobhaa De's Second Thoughts and Easterine Kire’s Life on Hold
• Comparative Effects of Zeolite and Fly Ash on Soil Properties and Agricultural Productivity
• Assessing Interrelationships among Banking Satisfaction, Cooperative Perspectives and Rural Service Beliefs in Cooperative Banking in Northern Nigeria
• High-Performance Alloys and Composites’ Applications in Production Engineering
• Integrating Tidal Energy into Sub-Saharan Africa’s Power Mix: A Strategic Framework for Renewable Energy Expansion