Deep Fracture Mapping and Groundwater Potential Assessment Using Magneto Telluric (MT) Resistivity Imaging in Kilambakkam Region

Abstract: Groundwater exploration in hard rock terrains requires advanced geophysical techniques to identify high-yielding aquifers. This study utilizes Magneto telluric (MT) resistivity imaging to delineate subsurface fracture zones and assess groundwater potential in the Kilambakkam region. The resistivity profiles reveal a complex hydrogeological setting characterized by shallow weathered zones (50m-100m depth) with low water yield, deeper fractured aquifers (120m-250m depth) with moderate yield, and deep-seated fault zones (180m-300m depth) exhibiting high groundwater potential. Two primary borewell target zones have been identified based on low resistivity anomalies (1-6 Ωm), indicating significant water-bearing formations. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating geophysical surveys with hydrogeological data to optimize borewell placement and enhance sustainable groundwater extraction. Further validation through vertical electrical sounding (VES) and pumping tests is recommended to ensure long-term aquifer viability.

Magneto telluric (MT) Resistivity Imaging, Groundwater Exploration, Fracture Zones, Hard Rock Aquifers, Low Resistivity Anomalies, Hydro geophysics, Fault Zones, Kilambakkam

1. Chave, A. D., & Jones, A. G. (2012). The Magnetotelluric Method: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Kumar, D., Singh, V. S., & Mohan, S. (2015). Identification of groundwater potential zones using resistivity imaging and GIS techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1242-1253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Vozoff, K. (1972). The magnetotelluric method in the exploration of sedimentary basins. Geophysics, 37(1), 98-141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. CGWB (2019). Groundwater Resources and Development Prospects in Tamil Nadu. Central Ground Water Board, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Krishnamurthy, N. S., Kumar, D., & Singh, V. S. (2019). Identification of groundwater potential zones in crystalline terrain using geophysical methods. Journal of Environmental Geology, 78(5), 245-256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ramesh, S., Rajendran, K., & Kumaravel, P. (2017). Hydrogeophysical investigation in hard rock terrain using resistivity techniques. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(3), 561-576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sathish, R., Prabhakar, K., & Balasubramanian, A. (2020). Geoelectrical characterization of groundwater in fractured rock aquifers of Tamil Nadu. Geophysical Journal International, 221(2), 1005-1018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ravindran, A. A., Kingston, J. V., & Premshiya, K. H. (2020). Mitigation Dredging in SeabedGeotechnical Engineering Study Using Marine 2D ERI and Textural Characteristics in ThengapattanamHarbour, South India. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01530-z(01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring the Concept of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review
• Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Critiquing-Based Mobile-Web Employment Recommender System
• Integrating Bhagavad Gita Principles with Modern Supply Chain Management: A Framework for Ethical and Resilient Operations
• Soilless Indoor Farming: A Systematic Review of Iot-Based Monitoring Systems and Physiochemical Characterization Methods for Lactuca Sativa
• Financial Awareness: A Survey of Students in Bhopal