Multicriteria Assessment of Conservation Agriculture Adoption: Balancing Soil Organic Carbon, Yield, Inputs, And Social Dimensions

Abstract: Conservation Agriculture (CA) is increasingly promoted as a sustainable farming approach with the potential to enhance productivity while improving environmental and social outcomes. However, adoption outcomes are often assessed through narrow lenses, overlooking the complex trade-offs among ecological, economic, and social dimensions. This review critically synthesizes existing studies using a multicriteria framework that balances soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics, crop yield performance, input efficiency, and social equity considerations. The evidence is explored from diverse agroecological settings, highlighting variations in SOC sequestration, yield stability, and labour and resource distribution under CA practices. The study reveals that while CA can improve soil health and reduce input dependency, the benefits are highly context-dependent, and adoption may exacerbate existing inequities, particularly among women and resource-poor farmers. Methodologically tools used for multicriteria analysis in agriculture, such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and weighted scoring systems, and a conceptual model for integrated and equity-sensitive evaluations are discussed. The conclusion with recommendations for participatory research and policy design to ensure CA initiatives support not just environmental sustainability, but also equitable rural development is made in this study.

Conservation Agriculture, Multicriteria Analysis, Soil Organic Carbon, Sustainable Intensification, Social dimensions

1. Andersson, J. A., & D'Souza, S. (2014). From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: A literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 187, 116-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Corbeels, M., Thierfelder, C., & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2014). Conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. In Conservation agriculture (pp. 443-476). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. De Olde, E. M., Moller, H., Marchand, F., McDowell, R. W., MacLeod, C. J., Sautier, M., ... & Manhire, J. (2017). When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 1327-1342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Erenstein, O., Sayre, K., Wall, P., Hellin, J., & Dixon, J. (2012). Conservation agriculture in maize-and wheat-based systems in the (sub) tropics: lessons from adaptation initiatives in South Asia, Mexico, and Southern Africa. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36(2), 180-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrogott, M., Brans, J. P., & Mareschal, B. (2005). PROMETHEE methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the Art Surveys, 163-186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field crops research, 114(1), 23-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ismail, I., Bernal, S. A., Provis, J. L., San Nicolas, R., Brice, D. G., Kilcullen, A. R., ... & van Deventer, J. S. (2013). Influence of fly ash on the water and chloride permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars and concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 48, 1187-1201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., & Derpsch, R. (2019). Global spread of conservation agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(1), 29-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 1(2), 95-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability, 7(5), 5875-5895. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lobell, D. B., & Azzari, G. (2017). Satellite detection of rising maize yield heterogeneity in the US Midwest. Environmental Research Letters, 12(1), 014014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C., & Theis, S. (2019). Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence. Agricultural systems, 172, 72-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mekouar, M. A. (2018). Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO). Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 29, 448-468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest ecology and management, 230(1-3), 1-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European journal of operational research, 158(3), 662-677. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Palm, C., Blanco-Canqui, H., DeClerck, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2014). Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 87-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Behrman, J., & Nkonya, E. (2011). Understanding the complexities surrounding gender differences in agricultural productivity in Nigeria and Uganda. Journal of Development Studies, 47(10), 1482-1509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., Van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E., ... & Van Kessel, C. (2015). Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 517(7534), 365-368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A., Sanchez, P. A., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature climate change, 4(8), 678-683. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., Flora, C. B., Godfray, H. C. J., ... & Wratten, S. (2018). Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), 441-446. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., Van Wijk, M. T., Rufino, M. C., Nyamangara, J., & Giller, K. E. (2011). A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions. Agronomy for sustainable development, 31, 657-673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F., & Liniger, H. P. (2009). Appraising and selecting conservation measures to mitigate desertification and land degradation based on stakeholder participation and global best practices. Land Degradation & Development, 20(3), 308-326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Stevenson, J. R., Serraj, R., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Evaluating conservation agriculture for small-scale farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tittonell, P. (2014). Ecological intensification of agriculture is sustainable by nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8, 53-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Thierfelder, C., Cheesman, S., & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2013). Benefits and challenges of crop rotations in maize-based conservation agriculture (CA) cropping systems of southern Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 11(2), 108-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Thierfelder, C., Matemba-Mutasa, R., Bunderson, W. T., Mutenje, M., Nyagumbo, I., & Mupangwa, W. (2016). Evaluating manual conservation agriculture systems in southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 222, 112-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Advanced Digital Communication Strategies: A Comprehensive Analysis
• Developing an Explainable AI System for Digital Forensics: Enhancing Trust and Transparency in Flagging Events for Legal Evidence
• The Global Impact of Government Censorship on Women’s Access to Information: A Literature Review
• "Reimagining Higher Education Workspaces: A Review on The Transformative Role of Digital Technology Adoption"
• Improved CSP Efficiency: Innovations and Challenges in Thermal Energy Storage Systems