The Impact of Lighting and Circulation on Movement Systems in Community Centers

Abstract: This study examines how lighting and circulation systems influence user comfort, security, accessibility, and community engagement in the University of Lagos community center. Using survey responses from 120 stakeholders, including visitors, staff, facility managers, and design experts, the research evaluates the effectiveness of existing infrastructure. Findings indicate that while most users rate these systems favourably, challenges remain, particularly in hallway and outdoor lighting, congestion in key areas, and limited accessibility for individuals with mobility impairments. Statistical analysis confirms that improved lighting enhances perceived security, while well-structured circulation facilitates navigation and social interaction. Additionally, respondents strongly support sustainable, technology-driven solutions such as motion-sensor lighting, smart signage, and solar-powered illumination. Based on these insights, targeted improvements are recommended to optimize lighting, circulation, and sustainability, ensuring a more inclusive and efficient community center.

Lighting Design, Circulation Systems, Accessibility, Sustainability, Public Spaces

1. Anthony, B. (2023). The role of community engagement in urban innovation towards the Co-Creation of smart Sustainable Cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1592–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beccali, M., Bonomolo, M., Lo Brano, V., Ciulla, G., Di Dio, V., Massaro, F., & Favuzza, S. (2019). Energy saving and user satisfaction for a new advanced public lighting system. Energy Conversion and Management, 195, 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Capece, S., Chivăran, C., Giugliano, G., Laudante, E., Nappi, M. L., & Buono, M. (2024). Advanced systems and technologies for the enhancement of user experience in cultural spaces: an overview. Heritage Science, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01186-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Castilla, N., Blanca-Giménez, V., Pérez-Carramiñana, C., & Llinares, C. (2024). The influence of the public lighting environment on local residents’ subjective assessment. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Čerešňová, Z., & Kacej, M. (2023). The circulation system of buildings: a key determinant of social behavior and the quality of social and health care for people. Slovenský Národopis, 71(3), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.31577/sn.2023.3.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Colistra, C., Bixler, R., & Schmalz, D. (2018). Exploring factors that contribute to relationship building in a community center. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2018.1542527 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Delitheou, V., Bakogiannis, E., & Kyriakidis, C. (2019). Urban planning: integrating smart applications to promote community engagement. Heliyon, 5(5), e01672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dikeos, M. D. (2019). Light as an ambient material in transformative urban “night” spaces. SHS Web of Conferences, 64, 03011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196403011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Erjavec, I. Š., & Ruchinskaya, T. (2019). A spotlight of co-creation and inclusiveness of public open spaces. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 209–223). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13417-4_17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Galiatsatos, P., Hailey-Fair, K., Johnson, M., Vanderpool, E. a. C., Stewart, R. W., Alexander, K., & Magsamen, S. (2024). Population health and community health: brokering the two through art and community engagement. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1480795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gómez, Y. a. G., Céspedes, V. H., Sánchez, D. M. G., Trujillo, Á. a. L., & García, N. T. (2021b). Social impact of renewable energy systems: solar energy system in vulnerable community case study. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(5), 2337–2344. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i5.3149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hassanain, M. A., & Al-Suwaiti, I. (2024). Stakeholder assessment of design quality indicators for community centers: a Delphi approach. Property Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-12-2023-0119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Madan, Ö. K., & Pekeriçli, M. (2021). Evaluation of a new user-centric sensor-based lighting control approach for circulation areas. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2042(1), 012123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pardo-Bosch, F., Blanco, A., Sesé, E., Ezcurra, F., & Pujadas, P. (2021). Sustainable strategy for the implementation of energy efficient smart public lighting in urban areas: case study in San Sebastian. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pine, K. H., Hinrichs, M. M., Wang, J., Lewis, D., & Johnston, E. (2020). For impactful community engagement. Communications of the ACM, 63(7), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3401720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ransley, B. (2020). An overview of recent findings on the effect of light on circulation rhythms. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). https://doi.org/10.21427/fgd9-h616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schwendinger, L., & Ross, P. R. (2022). Envisioning community engagement in smart lighting design. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1099(1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1099/1/012042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tony, Y., ElMeligy, A., Refaat, D., & ElSayed, G. (2019). Community Center as a cultural hub, for cultural heritage conservation. Resourceedings, 2(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.21625/resourceedings.v2i2.610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Treija, S., Stauskis, G., Korolova, A., & Bratuskins, U. (2023). Community Engagement in Urban Experiments: Joint effort for Sustainable Urban transformation. Landscape Architecture and Art, 22(22), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Advanced Techniques for Fake News Detection on Twitter Using NLP and AI: A Comprehensive Review
• Review of Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate
• Performance of Local Construction Contractors – Case Study of Registered Contractors in Monrovia, Liberia
• Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Innovation Management in Multinational Organizations
• Modeling of Reaction Between Dissolved Oxygen (DO) And Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) in Degradation River