Evaluating the Impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) on Construction Waste Reduction: A Study in Kuching, Sarawak
Authors
Mohamad Zain Hashim
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500 Pematang Pauh, Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (MY)
Sandra Chemunding Jonathan Guroh
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500 Pematang Pauh, Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (MY)
Idris Othman
Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia (MY)
Muriatul Khusmah Musa
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500 Pematang Pauh, Pulau, Pinang, Malaysia (MM)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1408000037
Subject Category: MANAGEMENT
Volume/Issue: 14/8 | Page No: 299-308
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-08-30
Published: 2025-08-30
Abstract
Abstract: Construction waste continues to be a serious global concern, placing pressure on natural resources, energy use, and landfill capacity. In many cases, this waste stems from issues like poor design, inefficient planning, and outdated procurement practices. This study was driven by the growing need to explore how modern digital tools particularly Building Information Modeling (BIM) can play a role in reducing waste on construction sites. Although BIM is widely recognised for its capabilities in 3D modelling, scheduling, and simulation, its actual impact on reducing construction waste in specific local contexts remains less understood. Focusing on construction projects in Kuching, Sarawak, the study set out to identify what factors most contribute to waste and how BIM can help address them. An online survey was distributed to industry professionals, and the responses were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Among five main factors examined environmental awareness, procurement procedures, document preparation, planning and management, and project design the analysis revealed that procurement procedures and project design had the strongest positive impact on improving cost estimates and building performance when supported by BIM. These findings highlight the potential of BIM not just as a design tool but as a practical solution to reduce waste and improve efficiency. This study offers useful insights for construction stakeholders aiming to adopt more sustainable and data-driven practices.
Keywords
construction waste, Building Information Modeling, project design, procurement, sustainability
Downloads
References
1. M. E. A. Zawawi, S. Osman, and S. S. Sahab, “Construction and Demolition Waste Management Practices in Sarawak: Priority for Regulation, Human Resources and Construction Method,” Int. J. Real …, vol. 16, no. S1, pp. 92–103, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. B. Salgın, A. Akgün, N. Coşgun, and K. Agyekum, “Construction Waste Reduction Through BIM-Based Site Management Approach,” Int. J. Eng. Technol. IJET, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 135–142, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. A. Yang, M. Han, Q. Zeng, and Y. Sun, “Adopting Building Information Modeling (BIM) for the Development of Smart Buildings: A Review of Enabling Applications and Challenges,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. O. O. Akinade et al., “Designing out construction waste using BIM technology: Stakeholders’ expectations for industry deployment,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 180, pp. 375–385, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. E. C. Eze, D. O. Aghimien, C. O. Aigbavboa, and O. Sofolahan, “Building information modelling adoption for construction waste reduction in the construction industry of a developing country,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2205–2223, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. M. Khairul, A. Ramly, M. F. Mohamad, and S. N. Aishah, “Building Information Modelling ( BIM ) as ‘ Disruptive Technology ’: An Insights of Construction Service Provider,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, no. February. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. W. Lu and H. Yuan, “Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 201–208, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. P. Bosch-sijtsema, A. Isaksson, M. Lennartsson, and H. C. J. Linderoth, “Barriers and facilitators for BIM use among Swedish medium-sized contractors - ‘ We wait until someone tells us to use it ,’” no. March, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. B. Succar and M. Kassem, “Macro-BIM adoption: Conceptual structures,” Autom. Constr., vol. 57, pp. 64–79, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. L. daisy chelangat Rono, “Microcredit and Its Relationship To the Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises in Konoin Subcounty, Kenya.,” Int. J. Adv. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 961–968, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. J. Joseph F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition. 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. C. C. Astuti, “PLS-SEM Analysis to Know Factors Affecting The Interest of Buying Halal Food in Muslim Students,” J. Varian, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. A. A. G. A. Yana, H. A. Rusdhi, and M. A. Wibowo, “Analysis of factors affecting design changes in construction project with Partial Least Square (PLS),” Procedia Eng., vol. 125, pp. 40–45, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. A. Kamis, R. A. Saibon, F. A. N. Yunus, M. B. Rahim, L. M. Herrera, and P. L. Y. Montenegro, “The SmartPLS Analyzes Approach in Validity and Reliability of Graduate Marketability Instrument,” Psychol. Educ., pp. 987–1001, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. S. . Rasoolimanesh, “Discriminant validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A comprehensive composite-based approach,” Data Anal. Perspect. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. M. R. Ab Hamid, W. Sami, and M. H. Mohmad Sidek, “Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 890, no. 1, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. I. Khuzainey, M. N. Zulkifli, M. Sattar Rasul, and C. L. Pang, “Technical competency among vocational teachers in malaysian public skills training institutions: Measurement model validation using PLS-SEM,” J. Tech. Educ. Train., vol. 12, no. 1 Special Issue, pp. 163–175, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. M. Abd Ghani, S. Rahi, M. mansour, H. Abed, and F. M. Alnaser, “The Impact of SERVQUAL Model and Subjective Norms on Customer?s Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in Islamic Banks: A Cultural Context,” Int. J. Econ. Manag. Sci., vol. 06, no. 05, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. Danks, and S. Ray, Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Advanced Techniques for Fake News Detection on Twitter Using NLP and AI: A Comprehensive Review
- Review of Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate
- Performance of Local Construction Contractors – Case Study of Registered Contractors in Monrovia, Liberia
- Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Innovation Management in Multinational Organizations
- Modeling of Reaction Between Dissolved Oxygen (DO) And Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) in Degradation River