00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Adaptive Illicit Transaction Identification in Online Marketplaces via Computational Intelligence

Authors

Shaheena K V

Dept. of MCA, Acharya Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India (IN)

Anila R Nambiar

Dept. of MCA, Acharya Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India (IN)

Shanu Kumar

Dept. of MCA, Acharya Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1408000106

Subject Category: Computer Science

Volume/Issue: 14/8 | Page No: 824-829

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-11

Published: 2025-09-11

Abstract

Abstract: Electronic trade crime has been a significant setback to the internet economy with the exploitation of weaknesses in the online business exchange. This research study evaluates the development of fraud detection methodology in online retailing and how contemporary automated learning systems have Classic exchange mechanisms based on rule-based. It offers a clear explanation of the general applicability of the methodology, both participant installation categorizer and Xgboost. This enhances the discoverability. This paper examines contemporary literature, covers the symptoms of relative performance, and covers problems, data, and research prospects. The findings explore the opportunities to adjust, evolve, and real-time ML tools in relation to internet fraud. Additionally, the paper has elucidated on the significance of the synthetic and realistic datasets in training the models reliably and there is a need to present a more explanatory solution to be implemented in real e-commerce systems. With the help of this review, this article is going to arbitrate future advances into the intellectual framework of fraud detection.

Keywords

E-Commerce, XGBoost, Electronic trade crime, Online retailing, Internet fraud detection, Machine learning, E-commerce security

Downloads

References

1. S. Monteith, M. Bauer, M. Aida, J. Geddes, P. C. Whybrow, and T. Glenn, “Increasing cybercrime since the pandemic: Concerns for psychiatry,” Curr. Psychiatry Rep., vol. 23, no. 4, p. 18, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. S. Kodate, R. Chiba, S. Kimura, and N. Masuda, “Detecting problematic transactions in a consumer-to-consumer e-commerce network,” Appl. Netw. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 90, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. R. Samani and G. Davis, “McAfee mobile threat report,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mcafee.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. E. W. T. Ngai, Y. Hu, Y. H. Wong, Y. Chen, and X. Sun, “The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 559–569, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. S. Smith and Juniper Research, “Online payment fraud: Market forecasts, emerging threats & segment analysis 2022–2027,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.juniperresearch.com/press/losses-online-payment-fraud-exceed-362-billion/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. A. Abdallah, M. A. Maarof, and A. Zainal, “Fraud detection system: A survey,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 68, pp. 90–113, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. R. J. Bolton and D. J. Hand, “Statistical fraud detection: A review,” Stat. Sci., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 235–255, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. C. Phua, V. Lee, K. Smith, and R. Gayler, “A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.6119, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. L. Akoglu, H. Tong, and D. Koutra, “Graph-based anomaly detection and description: A survey,” Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 626–688, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. D. Irani, S. Webb, and C. Pu, “Study of static classification of social spam profiles in MySpace,” in Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–89, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Bhowmick and S. M. Hazarika, “Machine learning for e-mail spam filtering: Review, techniques and trends,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01042, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. D. Savage, X. Zhang, X. Yu, P. Chou, and Q. Wang, “Anomaly detection in online social networks,” Soc. Netw., vol. 39, pp. 62–70, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nambiar, Anila Raveendran, Ranjitha K. M., and Shaheena K. V.“An Intelligent Deep Learning System for Identifying Bird Species.” Convergence of Machine Learning and IoT for Enabling the Future of Intelligent Systems, Qt Analytics Publication, 2024, pp. 60–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shaheena K. V., and Dhanalakshmi S. “Evaluating Image Segmentation Techniques: A Comparative Approach.” ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, vol. 5, no. 6, 2024, pp. 854–863. Granthaalayah Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gangadhar, Ch, Nama Ajay Nagendra, Syed Mutahar Aaqib, C. M. Sulaikha, Shaheena K. V., and Karanam Santoshachandra Rao.“COVID-19 Image Transmission Using Convolutional Neural Networks Based Algorithms for Medical Applications.” World Journal of Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, 2022, pp. 183 188. Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Maheswari, G., and Shaheena K. V. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. “MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Algorithms and Approaches — A Survey.” International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research (IJLEMR), 2017. [Cited by 2]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Guhan, T., Margaret Mary T., and Shaheena K. V.From Algorithms to Intelligence: Navigating the Frontiers of AI, Security, and Modern Computing. Qt Analytics Publication, 2025, pp. 1–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. A. Ali et al., “Financial fraud detection based on machine learning: A systematic literature review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 19, p. 9637, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. T. Pourhabibi, K. L. Ong, B. H. Kam, and Y. L. Boo, “Fraud detection: A systematic literature review of graph-based anomaly detection approaches,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 133, p. 113303, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. R. Banerjee, G. Bourla, S. Chen, M. Kashyap, and S. Purohit, “Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms through credit card fraud detection,” in Proc. IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conf., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018, pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. N. Carneiro, G. Figueira, and M. Costa, “A data mining-based system for credit-card fraud detection in e-tail,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 95, pp. 91–101, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. A. O. Adewumi and A. A. Akinyelu, “A survey of machine-learning and nature-inspired based credit card fraud detection techniques,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., vol. 8, no. S2, pp. 937–953, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. M. Ahmed, A. N. Mahmood, and M. R. Islam, “A survey of anomaly detection techniques in the financial domain,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 55, pp. 278–288, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. V. Rodrigues, L. Policarpo, and D. E. da Silveira, “Fraud detection and prevention in e-commerce: A systematic literature review,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422322000904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. J. West and M. Bhattacharya, “Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review,” Comput. Secur., vol. 57, pp. 47–66, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.