Evaluating Electrocoagulation Techniques for Landfill Leachate Treatment in Urban Storm Water Systems

Abstract: This work examines the efficiency of electrocoagulation (EC) as an eco-friendly and energy-efficient method for treating landfill leachate in the context of urban storm water management. EC was employed using three electrode configurations punched aluminium-steel, plain aluminium-steel, and plain aluminium - aluminium to evaluate their performance in removing key pollutants such as COD, BOD₅, and TSS. The tests were conducted on leachate samples from a landfill in Bangalore, India, by means of a lab-scale electrochemical reactor under constant voltage and varying electrode arrangements. Findings revealed that the punched aluminium - steel combination attained the highest pollutant removal efficiencies (up to 93.3% BOD, 91.8% COD, and 82.9% TSS) while consuming the least energy. The outcomes highlight that optimizing electrode design and spacing significantly enhances EC performance. The study supports integrating electrocoagulation into sustainable urban drainage strategies, emphasizing its role in mitigating leachate contamination and improving water quality in developing cities.

Electrocoagulation, landfill leachate, storm water management, BOD, COD, TSS, wastewater treatment, punched electrodes, urban planning, environmental engineering.

1. D. T. Moussa, M. H. El-Naas, M. Nasser, and M. J. Al-Marri, “A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 186, pp. 24–41, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.032. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. M. Verma and R. N. Kumar, “Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater,” J. Water Reuse Desalin., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 234–243, 2018, doi: 10.2166/wrd.2017.102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. S. M. D. U. Islam, “Electrocoagulation (EC) technology for wastewater treatment and pollutants removal,” Sustain. Water Resour. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 359–380, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40899-017-0152-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. NaveenBP, SivapullaiahPV, SitharamTG, and RamachandraTV, “Characterization of Leachate From Muncipal Landfill and Its Effect on Surrounding Water Bodies,” Conf. Conserv. Sustain. Manag. Wetl. Ecosyst. West. Ghats, no. November, 2014, doi: 10.13140/2.1.4110.3044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. V. Khandegar and A. K. Saroha, “Effect of Electrode Shape and Current Source on Performance of Electrocoagulation,” J. Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact. Waste, vol. 20, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. M. Tanyol, A. Ogedey, and E. Oguz, “COD removal from leachate by electrocoagulation process: Treatment with monopolar electrodes in parallel connection,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 177–186, 2018, doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. G. Yuliani, R. N. Arifin, and A. Setiabudi, “On the application of electrocoagulation/flotation (ECF) technique for cationic dye removals using aluminium electrode and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS),” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 751 KEM, pp. 726–730, 2017, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.751.726. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. N. C. M, “Review on treatment of industrial wastewaters by Electrochemical Coagulation (ECC),” Int. J. Adv. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 968–979, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. R. P. Rajesh and M. P. Saravanakumar, “A Review on Electrooxidation Treatment of Leachate : Strategies , New Developments , and Prospective Growth,” 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. S. B. Davuluri et al., “Innovative electrocoagulation strategies for landfill leachate treatment: Comparative analysis of aluminum and iron electrodes,” Sep. Sci. Technol., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 481–493, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01496395.2024.2325400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. P. Krystynik, P. Kluson, P. Masin, M. Syc, J. Jadrny, and Z. Krusinova, “Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification Implementation of electrocoagulation for reduction of Zn in an outlet stream from waste incineration plant,” Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif., vol. 188, no. March, p. 109368, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2023.109368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. T. U. U. and O. E., “Electrocoagulation of Landfill Leachate with Monopolar Aluminum Electrodes,” J. Clean Energy Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 2014, doi: 10.7763/jocet.2014.v2.82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. N. Galvão, J. B. de Souza, and C. M. de Sousa Vidal, “Landfill leachate treatment by electrocoagulation: Effects of current density and electrolysis time,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. N. A. Rahman, C. J. Jol, and V. Ismail, “Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification Emerging Application of Electrocoagulation for Tropical Peat Water Treatment : A Review,” Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif., vol. 165, no. February, p. 108449, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108449. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. H. M. Hanif et al., “Landfill leachate treatment technology via electrocoagulation: a review of operating parameters, intensification, and modelling,” Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 260, pp. 77–101, 2022, doi: 10.5004/dwt.2022.28456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. M. A. Kamaruddin, M. S. Yusoff, H. A. Aziz, and Y. T. Hung, “Sustainable treatment of landfill leachate,” Appl. Water Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 113–126, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s13201-014-0177-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. M. M. Emamjomeh and M. Sivakumar, “Review of pollutants removed by electrocoagulation and electrocoagulation/flotation processes,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1663–1679, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. M. Bunyamin, “Treatment of Landfill Leachate via Electrocoagulation and Electro-Fenton Processes : A Comparative Study,” vol. 42, no. 7, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. J. Harmsen, “Identification of organic compounds in leachate from a waste tip,” Water Res., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 699–705, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90239-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. B. P. Naveen, A. K. Sharma, P. V Sivapullaiah, and M. S. A. Narayana, “Characteristics of the Leachate From Msw Landfill,Bangalore,” Geosynth. India, no. October, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. G. Hassani et al., “Optimization of landfill leachate treatment process by electrocoagulation, electroflotation and sedimentation sequential method,” Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 6705–6718, 2016, doi: 10.20964/2016.08.10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Advanced Techniques for Fake News Detection on Twitter Using NLP and AI: A Comprehensive Review
• Review of Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate
• Performance of Local Construction Contractors – Case Study of Registered Contractors in Monrovia, Liberia
• Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Innovation Management in Multinational Organizations
• Modeling of Reaction Between Dissolved Oxygen (DO) And Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) in Degradation River