The Rise of Artificial Intelligence for Research Among University Students Studying Stem-Related Courses

Abstract: The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education has raised questions about its utilization in academic environments, particularly in STEM fields. This study focused on the utilization of AI-based tools among STEM students at Lagos State University. The research sought to determine the level of awareness, usage patterns, and perceptions of AI tools, with particular attention to whether AI could replace or assist human instructors. The study was guided by three research questions and two hypotheses centered on AI’s impact on research and education. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, with a population comprising STEM students across different academic levels. A sample size of 150 respondents was selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, validated with a reliability index of 0.82. The analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicated that 95.1% of the respondents had utilized AI tools, with ChatGPT being the most commonly used. Students generally found AI tools effective in enhancing their research outcomes, but challenges such as technical difficulties and limited access were prevalent. Furthermore, while students acknowledged AI’s potential to assist educators, a majority emphasized that AI should not replace human instructors due to its lack of human empathy and adaptability. The study concluded that AI-based tools are beneficial for research and education, but there is a need for improved access and training. It was recommended that educational institutions invest in AI tools and ensure that students receive adequate training to enhance their research skills while maintaining a balance between AI usage and human-led learning.

Artificial Intelligence, STEM education, AI-based tools, student perception, academic research

1. Anih, P. A., & Ukeh, B. S. (2023). E-learning and AI in education. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(1), 15-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Utilization of AI in education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ariyibi, O. O., Adebanjo, S. A., & Mohammed, A. O. (2025). Effect of Utilizing “Mypersonalteacher” Online Videos Platform on Achievement of Secondary School Students in Economics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 1420-1430. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bawa, P. (2016). Personalized learning environments and their impact on student engagement and achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 123-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Byrne, R., & Callaghan, J. (2014). Complex systems and AI integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 110-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dutsina, D., Tanbayal, E., & Sabitu, K. (2020). Gender and technology: Analyzing online learning success among university students. Technology in Education, 24(2), 34-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Commission. (2019). Educational agendas for ICT integration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Lawrence, S., & Tar, U. (2020). Trends in educational technology investments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gaol, F. L., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2021). Digital technologies and education: A global perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2781–2800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10506-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. González-Gómez, D., Asto, R., & Rojas, R. (2012). Female students and e-learning: A survey of attitudes and preferences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 174-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. James, K.E., Ariyibi, O.O., Egbowon, S.E. & Akindoju, G.O. (2024): Emerging Technologies and its Implications on The Future Of Work. Journal of Behavioural Informatics, Digital Humanities and Development Rese Vol. 10 No. 4. Pp 1-8. https://www.isteams.net/behavioralinformaticsjournal dx.doi.org/10.22624/AIMS/BHI/V10N4P1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kashu, I. (2014). Exploring the performance differences between male and female students in online learning environments. Journal of Distance Education, 29(4), 40-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kisigot, A., Ogula, A., & Munyua, G. (2021). Understanding gender dynamics in technology adoption among university students. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2), 98-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lawrence, S., & Tar, U. (2018). ICT integration in education systems: Current trends and future directions. International Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijet.2018.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mayer, R. E. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Monte-Serrat, D., & Cattani, D. (2021). The role of AI in future technologies. Journal of AI Research, 11(2), 52-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in a multimedia world: The role of the modality effect. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 181-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Okobia, O. (2022). The effects of advanced e-learning approaches on academic achievement and problem-solving ability. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 789-806. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Owoyemi S.O., Ariyibi O, Akindoju O.G, Famuyide A.J., Somade M.A & Adelaja M.A. (2024). Awareness, Skills and Knowledge of Lecturers and Students in Machine Learning in Lagos State University. Educational Perspectives, 13(1), 151-158. https://educationalperspectives.org.ng/read.php?id=278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Powers, D. (2022). The influence of AI on global development. Globalization and Technology, 29(2), 215-229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rapoport, A. (1986). System perspective in education and AI. Systems Research, 3(1), 18-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Savage, R. (2020). AI in industry: Transformative technologies. AI & Robotics Journal, 9(1), 101-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Siemens, G. (2013). The role of AI in research innovations. Journal of Research and Innovation in Learning Technologies, 21(3), 75-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Volti, R. (2009). Technology and society: A philosophical perspective. New York, NY: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wangu, R. (2014). Gender differences in academic performance in online learning environments: A review. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 23-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zafar, A., Rehman, A., & Amin, A. (2018). Automated grading systems: The future of assessment in education. Computers & Education, 127, 150-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Advanced Techniques for Fake News Detection on Twitter Using NLP and AI: A Comprehensive Review
• Review of Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate
• Performance of Local Construction Contractors – Case Study of Registered Contractors in Monrovia, Liberia
• Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Innovation Management in Multinational Organizations
• Modeling of Reaction Between Dissolved Oxygen (DO) And Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) in Degradation River