00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Philosophy of Management in Relation to Scientism and Technology: A Review of Literature

Authors

Olatunbosun Monsuru Alani

D.S. Adegbenro ICT Polytechnic, General Studies Unit (NG)

Prof. Olajide Olubayo Thomas

Lagos State University, Department of Business Administration. (NG)

Dr. Musa Richard

D.S. Adegbenro ICT Polytechnic, Department of Business Administration. (NG)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1408000198

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 14/8 | Page No: 1605-1613

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-24

Published: 2025-09-24

Abstract

Abstract: This study addresses the philosophy of management via the twin lenses of scientism and technology within organizational contexts. Scientism, characterized by the focus on empirical facts and scientific procedures, has profoundly affected current management practices by fostering objectivity, efficiency, and predictability. Simultaneously, fast technology innovation has altered organizational structures, procedures, and decision-making methodologies. While both scientism and technology offer great instruments for enhancing performance, their dominance can obscure the human, ethical, and contextual components of management. This paper critically evaluates these factors, proposing for a balanced management philosophy that mixes scientific rigor and technical competence with human-centric values and ethical considerations. Such holistic strategy helps firms to stay inventive, adaptive, and socially responsible in a more complicated and digitalized word.

Keywords

Epistemology, Management Philosophy, Scientism, Technology, Ethics

Downloads

References

1. Agafonow, A. (2022). “Philosophy of Science for Management Theory, Practice, and Sci-fi Freaks: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 205–218. Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amanawa, D.E. (2022). An Introduction to Management Concepts. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research (IJAMSR), vol. 6 Issue 6, June - 2022, Pages: 1-16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beltramini, E. (2018). Philosophy of Management Between Scientism and Technology. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Blok, V. (2019). Xenophone’s Philosophy of Management. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blok, V. (2020), What Is (Business) Management? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Management. Philosophy of Management (2020) 19:173-189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bukwalter, W and Turri J (2018). Moderate Scientism in Philosophy. The University of Manchester Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Delfanti, A. (2021). The Warehouse: Workers and Robots at Amazon. Pluto Press, Proquest Ebook Central. Available at https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/metropolia-ebooks/detail.action?doc1D=6749277. Accessed: May 5, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Donaldson, Tom. 2022. “How Methods of Moral Philosophy Inform Business.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 677–692. Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eketu, C.A. (2017). Management Research: A thought on Validity of Positivism. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research/Social & Management Sciences, vol. 3, Issue 11, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gutterman, A.S. (2023). Technology Management. Researchgate, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hietanen, J., Tuunen, P., Hirvonen, I., Karisto, J., Paltiniemi, I., and Saarinen, H. (2020). How not to Criticise Scientism. Metaphilosophy, Vol. 51, issue 4, p. 522 – 547. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kalko, M.M., Erena, O.T. & Debele, S.A. (2023). Technology Management Practices and Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Medium-and Large Scale Manufacturing firms in Ethiopia. Afican Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mizrahi, M. (2022). For and Against Scientism Science, Methodology, and the Future of Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, April, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mizrahi, M. (2023). Why Everything You Think You Know About Scientism is Probably Wrong. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 1-8 (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ningsih, S., Yusnandar, W., Sipahutar, M. & Mujiatun, S. (2024). Development Of Philosophy Of Science In Management In The Digital Era. Jurnal Ekonomi Volume 13, Number 04, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Obeng, H.A. (2023). Exploring the Correlation between Philosophy of Science and Business Administration, with a Focus on Organisational Behaviour and Human Resource Management. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, Vol. 8, Issue 9, September – 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Okolie, U.C. and Oyise, U.Z. (2021). The Evolution of Management: A historical Perspective. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, issue 22/2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Peels, R. (2018). “A Conceptual Map of Scientism”. In Scientism: Problems and Prospects. Edited by Jeroen Ridder, Rik Peels, and Rene Woudenberg, 28 – 56, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rendtorff, J.D. (2017). Perspectives on Philosophy of Management and Business Ethics. Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, vol. 51, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rosenberg, N. (2018). How History Gets Things Wrong. The Neuroscience of Our Addiction to Stories. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sainato, M. (2020). “I am not a Robot”: Amazon Workers Condemn Unsafe, Gruelling Conditions at Warehouse. The Guardian online. Available at htpps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/05/amazon-workers-protest-unsafe-gruelling-conditions-warehouse. Accessed: May 5, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Savushkin, N. (2024). Warehouse Automation in Logistic: Case Study of Amazon and Ocado. Metropolitan University of Applied Sciences Thesis, March 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wilson, D.A. (2023). The Philosophy of Management Today. Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Woudenberg, R. (2023). Argumentative Strategies Against Scientism: An Overview. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 48, No. 2, 411 – 426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Harry Yulianto [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YPUP Makassar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Harry Yulianto [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YPUP Makassar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yulianto, H., Tinggi, S and Makassarn (2021). Philosophy of Management Science: Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology Perspectives. Cross-Border Journal of Business Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, June, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhuoyan Li (2024). Review of Application of AI in Amazon Warehouse Management. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, vol. 144(1): 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Harry Yulianto [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YPUP Makassar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.