Evaluating the Teaching Effectiveness of UA741-Based Op-Amp Configurations in Enhancing Student Learning: Experimental Results and Analysis.
Authors
Jonathan Ebube Jibunor
Department of Physics, National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Jabi, Abuja. (NG)
Olamotse Roland Igbape
Department of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA. (NG)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1408000200
Subject Category: Physics and Electronics Engineering
Volume/Issue: 14/8 | Page No: 1620-1650
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-25
Published: 2025-09-25
Abstract
Abstract: This report presents the results of research conducted at Auchi, Edo State, Nigeria, to evaluate the effectiveness of UA741-based op-amp configurations in enhancing student learning. The study utilized the instrumentation module developed by Jibunor et al. (2025) in their work titled "Design and Development of an LM741 Instrumentation Module for Enhancing the Teaching of Basic Analog Circuit Principles in Physics and Electrical Engineering" [International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), [https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/design-and-development-of-an-lm741-instrumentation-module-for-enhancing-the-teaching-of-basic-analog-circuit-principles-in-physics-and-electrical-engineering/]]. Traditional electronics education often struggles to connect theory with practical application, making it hard for students to understand op-amps in circuit design. "This study involved 40 second-year students from the Physics and Electrical Engineering programs, divided into two groups of 20. One group served as the experimental group, assessing the UA741 module through six configurations: voltage follower, inverting amplifier, non-inverting amplifier, summing amplifier, difference amplifier, and integrator, while the other group functioned as the control group. Knowledge tests were given at the end of the lessons, based on Bloom’s taxonomy, covering knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Results showed that using the UA741 module significantly improved both the quantity and quality of student achievement compared to the traditional "chalk-and-talk" method. Data analysis focused on performance characteristics like voltage gain, waveform shapes, and input-output relationships, confirming expected behaviors. These findings highlight the effectiveness of hands-on experimentation in enhancing student understanding of electrical and electronic concepts, thus improving teaching effectiveness.
Keywords
UA741 Op-Amp, Teaching Effectiveness, Student Learning, Experimental Results, Circuit Configurations
Downloads
References
1. Adrian, O. G. O., Emagbetere, A., & Johnbull, J. (2015). The impact of physics laboratory on students offering physics in Ethiope West Local Government Area of Delta State. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(7), 951-956. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Agarwal, R. P. (2005). Challenges in Teaching Analog Electronics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 638-641. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Design and development of physics module based on learning style and appropriate technology by employing Isman instructional design model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Avelino, A. M., delos Santos, G. A., Danoso, J. T., Gumapac, R. L. D., & Vicedo, M. M. V. (2015). Design and testing of a mobile studio operational amplifier trainer board. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research, 3(4), 223-230. https://www.researchpublish.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bearden, I., Dvořák, L., & Planinšič, G. (2022). Work Group 2 Position Paper: Experiments and Laboratory Work in Teacher Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2297, 012008. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2297/1/012008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bello, T. (2012). Effect of Availability and Utilization of Physics Laboratory Equipment on Students’ Academic Achievement in Senior Secondary School Physics. World Journal of Education, 2(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n5p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Berg, E. van den (2009). The PCK of teaching in the laboratory: Turning manipulation of equipment into manipulation of ideas. In O. de Jong & L. Halim (Eds.), Teachers' Professional Knowledge in Science and Mathematics Education: Views from Malaysia and Abroad (pp. 85-110). Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. ISBN: 978-983-2267-07-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Performance evaluation of the LM741 operational amplifier under varying temperature conditions. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2932567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chong, P. L., Ganesan, S., Ng, P. K., & Kong, F. Y. (2022). A TRIZ-Adopted Development of a Compact Experimental Board for the Teaching and Learning of Operational Amplifier with Multiple Circuit Configurations. Sustainability, 14(21), 14115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Costa, R., Portela, P., & Alves, G. (2017). An educational kit to teach and learn Operational Amplifiers. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS) (pp. 137-138). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EXPAT.2017.7984353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Costa, Ricardo & Portela, Paulo & Alves, Gustavo & Felgueiras, Carlos & Viegas, Clara. (2021). An Alternative Way of Teaching Operational Amplifiers Using a Reconfigurable and Expandable Kit. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/RITA.2021.3125893. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Costa, Ricardo & Portela, Paulo & Alves, Gustavo & Felgueiras, Carlos & Viegas, Clara. (2018). A reconfigurable and expandable kit to teach electronic circuits based on Operational Amplifiers. 1-10. 10.1109/TAEE.2018.8476096. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Cynthia, C., Arafah, C., & Palloan, P. (2023). Development of Interactive Physics E-Module to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9, 3943-3952. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fan, H., Li, S., Feng, Q., Chen, W., Ye, X., Xie, S., & Heidari, H. (2019). Reform and Practice of Analog Circuits. In 2018 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS 2018) (pp. 346-349). Chengdu, China: IEEE. doi:10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Fuada, Syifaul. (2022). Development of Educational Kit for Practical Course in the Topic of Phase-Shift RC Oscillator. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE). 18. 112-130. 10.3991/ijoe.v18i05.29131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Gray, P. R., & Meyer, R. G. (2009). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Grigoriou, V., Papageorgiou, K., & Kalkanis, G. (2010). Hands-on Experimentation in Educational Physics Laboratory utilizing a Common Mobile Phone – The Case of Decrescent Oscillation. In M. Kalogiannakis, D. Stavrou, & P. Michaelidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hands-on Science (pp. 355-357). Retrieved from http://www.clab.edc.uoc.gr/HSci2010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Horowitz, P., & Hill, W. (2015). The art of electronics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Jibunor, J. E., Olayinka, A. S., & Igbape, O. R. (2025). Design and Development of an LM741 Instrumentation Module for Enhancing the Teaching of Basic Analog Circuit Principles in Physics and Electrical Engineering. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 10(4), pages 826-852, April, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kendir Tekgül, E., & Yaltkaya, Ş. (2023). Gamma Ray Effect on Op-Amp 741 and Timer 555 IC. Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering, 28(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1094384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lean, Chong & Ganesan, Silvia & Ng, Poh Kiat & Kong, Feng. (2022). A TRIZ-Adopted Development of a Compact Experimental Board for the Teaching and Learning of Operational Amplifier with Multiple Circuit Configurations. Sustainability. 14. 14115. 10.3390/su142114115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Li, H., & Dong, B. (2023). Research on portable constant pulse current source device. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2479, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2479/1/012008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Maricau, E., & Gielen, G. (2013). Analog IC Reliability in Nanometer CMOS. Analog Circuits and Signal Processing. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6163-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Medha, U., & Upadhyaya, K. S. (2019). Experimentation in Physics on Virtual Labs Using Smart Phones in Schools. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 8(6), 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mihret, Z., Alemu, M., & Assefa, S. (2023). Effectiveness of blended physics laboratory experimentation on pre-service physics teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Pedagogical Research, 8(1), em0144. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. National Semiconductor. (1998). LM741 Operational Amplifier. Retrieved from https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm741.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ndihokubwayo, K. (2017). Investigating the status and barriers of science laboratory activities in Rwandan teacher training colleges towards improvisation practice. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(1), 47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2019). An Assessment of the Impact of Improvised versus Conventional Laboratory Equipment on Students’ Performance in Thermal Expansion. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajesms/article/view/188308/177571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Omar, Norsyira Zuraiza & Daud, Sharipah & Abdul Rahman, Rahimah. (2019). Electronic Educational Development Kit For Amplifier Circuit Using Adjusting Gain. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Pursky, Oleg & Gamaliy, V & Demidov, P & Dubovyk, T & Buchatska, I & Forostyana, N. (2023). Laboratory equipment for practice learning in the framework of educational course “Molecular Physics and Thermodynamics”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2611. 012011. 10.1088/1742-6596/2611/1/012011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-011-9291-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Rashid, M., & Khan, A. I. (2020). Augmented Reality in Electrical and Electronics Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1691-1704. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2015). Microelectronic circuits (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Sujanem, Rai, & Suwindra, I. N., & Suswandi, I. (2020). The effectiveness of problem-based interactive physics e-module on high school students' critical thinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Talukder, Habib & Collier, Michael. (2002). A General Purpose Microcontroller Trainer. African Journal of Science and Technology. 3. 10.4314/ajst.v3i1.15296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Tamunoiyowuna, S., & Omeodu, M. D. (2022). Extent of availability and usage of various laboratory equipment among physics students’ in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 13(03), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.3.0190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Tan, P. (2021). Research on the Development and Reform of Electronic Physics Laboratory Based on Computer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1744, 032195. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Temes, G. C., & LaSorte, N. J. (1980). Challenges in Teaching Analog Electronics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 23(4), 238-241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Texas Instruments. (2020). LM741 Operational Amplifier. Retrieved from https://www.ti.com/product/LM741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Voudoukis, N., & Pagiatakis, G. (2017). Operational amplifiers teaching and students' understanding. 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942865. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Advanced Techniques for Fake News Detection on Twitter Using NLP and AI: A Comprehensive Review
- Review of Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate
- Performance of Local Construction Contractors – Case Study of Registered Contractors in Monrovia, Liberia
- Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Innovation Management in Multinational Organizations
- Modeling of Reaction Between Dissolved Oxygen (DO) And Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) in Degradation River