00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Next Word Prediction Model Using Long Short-Term Memory Networks and Machine Learning

Authors

Mujtaba Ali

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India (IN)

Mohammad Umair

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India (IN)

Inzamamullhaque

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1409000034

Subject Category: Computer science

Volume/Issue: 14/9 | Page No: 245-250

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-01

Published: 2025-10-01

Abstract

Abstract- Next Word Prediction (NWP) is essential in applications like predictive text and virtual assistants. This study explores using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for NWP, addressing the limitations of traditional models such as n-grams in capturing long-term dependencies. The model is trained on preprocessed datasets, incorporating tokenization, sequence generation, and embedding layers to represent textual data. LSTM layers are utilized to understand sequential context, followed by dense layers for prediction. Performance is evaluated through metrics like perplexity and accuracy, with the LSTM model demonstrating superior contextual understanding and predictive accuracy compared to traditional methods. The research also suggests future improvements, including hyperparameter tuning and exploring transformer architectures, to enhance NWP performance across various applications.

Keywords

Next-Word Prediction, LSTM, Natural Language Processing, Recurrent Neural Networks, Deep Learning

Downloads

References

1. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2014). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Graves, A. (2013). Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2013). On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., & Vinyals, O. (2014). Recurrent neural network regularization. arXiv:1409.2329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cho, K., van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder- decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., & Vincent, P. (2001). A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1137-1155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mikolov, T., & Zweig, G. (2012). Context dependent recurrent neural network language model. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT 2012). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2015). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In Proceedings of ICLR 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Joulin, A., Grave, E., Mikolov, T., & Bojanowski, P. (2017). Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. arXiv:1607.01759. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kim, Y. (2014). Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wang, X., & Wan, X. (2015). A deep learning approach for next-word prediction using LSTM. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 26(4), 863-875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre- training. OpenAI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yu, L., & Lu, H. (2018). Next-word prediction with LSTM networks for web- based applications. Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, 12(2), 134-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhou, Z., & Zhang, S. (2016). An improved deep learning model for next-word prediction in natural language processing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2016). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hassani, H., & Kiani, M. (2020). A deep recurrent model for next-word prediction based on LSTM with attention. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(48), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Word prediction model using LSTM networks for real-time applications. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 76-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Liu, H., & Xu, H. (2019). A survey on deep learning in natural language processing and text prediction. IEEE Access, 7, 63590-63605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.