Assessing Hydrological Dynamics in A Tropical Watershed: A Swat-Based Approach Using the Priestley-Taylor Method

Abstract: Potential evapotranspiration (PET) and evapotranspiration (ET) are vital components of the hydrological cycle, particularly in tropical watersheds where water management relies on accurate predictions of water availability. This study employed the Priestley-Taylor method within the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model long-term PET and hydrological responses in the Oyun Watershed, Kwara State, Nigeria, over a 30-year period (1991–2021). The model was parameterized using a 90-meter Digital Elevation Model (DEM), land use and soil maps, and daily climate data from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet). The Priestley-Taylor method was selected for its suitability in data-scarce and humid regions. Model simulations revealed a total PET of 11,807.51 mm over the simulation period, with spatial variation across sub-basins ranging from 596.51 mm to 721.96 mm. Groundwater recharge was estimated at 8,050.46 mm, while surface runoff was 3,469.06 mm. Land cover, slope, and soil permeability significantly influenced the spatial variability of these outputs. Calibration and validation results demonstrated satisfactory model performance, with Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) and the coefficient of determination (R²) exceeding 0.7. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the SWAT model for predicting hydrological responses in data-scarce, humid regions, providing critical insights for water management in the Oyun Watershed.

Evapotranspiration, Potential Evapotranspiration, Nigeria, Priestley-Taylor Method, SWAT Model, Hydrological Modeling, Oyun Watershed

1. Abbaspour, K.C., Vejdani, M. and Haghighat, S. (2007) ‘SWAT-CUP Calibration and Uncertainty Programs for SWAT Model’, Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM07), Christchurch, New Zealand, 17–20 December, pp. 1596–1602. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alemayehu, T., McCartney, M. and Kebede, S. (2009) ‘Hydrological modelling of the Koga watershed, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia’, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 9(1), pp. 97–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andersson, L., Wilk, J. and Sandström, K. (2009) ‘Impact of climate change and development scenarios on flow patterns in the Okavango River’, Journal of Hydrology, 370(1–4), pp. 58–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R., Haney, E.B. and Neitsch, S.L. (2012) Soil and Water [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Assessment Tool: Input/Output File Documentation Version 2012. Texas Water Resources Institute, TR-439. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arnold, J.G., Moriasi, D.N., Gassman, P.W., Abbaspour, K.C., White, M.J., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C. and Harmel, R.D. (2012) ‘SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation’, Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4), pp. 1491–1508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., Molden, D.J. and Makin, I.W. (2000) ‘Remote sensing for irrigated agriculture: examples from research and possible applications’, Agricultural Water Management, 46(2), pp. 137–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Beven, K.J. (2012) Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer. 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boschetti, M., Nutini, F., Manfron, G., Brivio, P.A. and Nelson, A. (2014) ‘Comparative analysis of normalised difference spectral indices derived from MODIS for detecting surface water in flooded rice cropping systems’, Paddy and Water Environment, 12(3), pp. 301–313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Buytaert, W., Celleri, R., Willems, P., Bièvre, B.D. and Wyseure, G. (2006) ‘Spatial and temporal rainfall variability in mountainous areas: A case study from the south Ecuadorian Andes’, Journal of Hydrology, 329(3–4), pp. 413–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cai, X., McKinney, D.C. and Lasdon, L.S. (2003) ‘Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management’, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(1), pp. 4–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, X., Alimohammadi, N. and Wang, D. (2013) ‘Modeling interannual variability of evapotranspiration at the catchment scale through a Budyko framework-based rescaling of NDVI’, Water Resources Research, 49(10), pp. 6879–6889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Döll, P. and Fiedler, K. (2008) ‘Global-scale modeling of groundwater recharge’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12(3), pp. 863–885. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Donohue, R.J., McVicar, T.R. and Roderick, M.L. (2010) ‘Assessing the ability of potential evaporation formulations to capture the dynamics in evaporative demand within a changing climate’, Journal of Hydrology, 386(1–4), pp. 186–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Droogers, P. and Allen, R.G. (2002) ‘Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions’, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16(1), pp. 33–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. FAO (2020) Transboundary River Basins – Status and Trends. Rome: FAO. Available at: https://www.fao.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS and JRC (2012) Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2). Rome: FAO and IIASA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Farr, T.G. et al. (2007) ‘The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission’, Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2), RG2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fohrer, N., Haverkamp, S. and Frede, H.G. (2001) ‘Assessment of the effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions’, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 26(7–8), pp. 577–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H. and Arnold, J.G. (2007) ‘The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions’, Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), pp. 1211–1250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Githui, F., Mutua, F. and Bauwens, W. (2009) ‘Estimating the impacts of land-cover change on runoff using the SWAT model: Case study of Nzoia catchment, Kenya’, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54(5), pp. 899–908. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Healy, R.W. and Cook, P.G. (2002) ‘Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge’, Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1), pp. 91–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Immerzeel, W.W. and Droogers, P. (2008) ‘Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration’, Journal of Hydrology, 349(3–4), pp. 411–424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jothityangkoon, C. and Sivapalan, M. (2009) ‘Framework for predicting daily streamflow distributions from rainfall and landscape data’, Advances in Water Resources, 32(12), pp. 1800–1814. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kustas, W.P. and Anderson, M.C. (2009) ‘Advances in thermal infrared remote sensing for land surface modeling’, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(12), pp. 2071–2081. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Li, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, X. and Zheng, F. (2009) ‘Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China’, Journal of Hydrology, 377(1–2), pp. 35–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S.G. and Amatya, D.M. (2005) ‘A comparison of six potential evapotranspiration methods for regional use in the southeastern United States’, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(3), pp. 621–633. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. MacDonald, A.M., Bonsor, H.C., Dochartaigh, B.E. and Taylor, R.G. (2012) ‘Quantitative maps of groundwater resources in Africa’, Environmental Research Letters, 7(2), p. 024009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Maidment, D.R. (2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2016) ‘Four billion people facing severe water scarcity’, Science Advances, 2(2), p. e1500323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Van Liew, M.W., Bingner, R.L., Harmel, R.D. and Veith, T.L. (2007) ‘Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations’, Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), pp. 885–900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mu, Q., Zhao, M. and Running, S.W. (2011) ‘Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm’, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(8), pp. 1781–1800. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Muleta, M.K. and Nicklow, J.W. (2005) ‘Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model’, Journal of Hydrology, 306(1–4), pp. 127–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R. and Williams, J.R. (2011) Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, TR-406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ogunlela, A.O. and Ogunbodede, B.A. (2001) ‘Water resources planning and management for sustainable agricultural production’, Nigerian Journal of Technological Development, 1(1), pp. 37–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Competency and Challenges of BTLED-ICT Students in 2D Animation: An Analytical Study
• Slope Stability Assessment: A Case Study of Embankments Along OMU-Aran-Ilorin Road, Nigeria
• Advancements in Precursors, Materials, Deposition Techniques for Thin Film Research in Electronic Devices: A Mini Review
• “Empowering Indian Women through Entrepreneurship: A Study on Kolkata”
• Impact of Mental Mathematics Proficiency on Job Performance Among Seconadry Schools Teachers in Emohua and Port Hacourt City