Design and Development of a Batch Waste Biomass Stove for Sustainable Cooking in Rural Kenya

Dependence on fossil fuels and wood in rural Kenya, which contributes to deforestation and increased greenhouse gas emissions, must be addressed immediately. Waste biomass is being investigated as a viable alternative, providing a potential fix for the urgent wood reliance issue and climate change. However, common biomass stoves still have shortcomings in that they discharge more flue gases into the environment due to incomplete combustion, and use charcoal as fuel. This study proposes the development of a unique batch biomass stove in the pursuit of cleaner, more effective cooking methods. Various biomass materials are investigated under different stove configurations that involve variation of primary and secondary air holes. High thermal efficiency of 67.1% for bagasse pellets and 68% for coconut husks was achieved during a standard water boiling test. A noteworthy byproduct of the stove is valuable biochar, which may be used to improve soil fertility, effluent color and odor removal, and promote sustainability. These results not only demonstrate the potential of waste biomass as a substitute energy source but also signal the beginning of environmentally friendly cooking methods and soil improvement in rural Kenya. In essence, this research represents a crucial step toward balancing human needs with environmental well-being and paves the way for a day when efficiency, environmental consciousness, and soil enrichment naturally combine.

Sustainability, Biochar, Bagasse pellets, Coconut husks, Greenhouse gas emissions Subtheme, climate change

1. Abbas, A., & Ermakov, A. (2023). The role of natural gas in powering Africa’s future. May. www.gecf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bailis, R., Ghosh, E., O’Connor, M., Kwamboka, E., Ran, Y., & Lambe, F. (2020). Enhancing clean cooking options in peri-urban Kenya: A pilot study of advanced gasifier stove adoption. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab865a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baruah, D., & Baruah, D. C. (2014). Modeling of biomass gasification: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 806–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bolo, E., Okoth, S., Atela, J., Randa, T., Akala, H., & Osogo, P. (2022). The Biomass Challenge in Kenya. MECS Brief 001-2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Development, S. (2018). Design Improvements for Top-Lit UpDraft Biochar-Producing Gasifier Stove in Rural Kenya from the Users ’ Perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Energy Efficient Cook Stoves for Siaya Communities – Kenya | UNFCCC. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://unfccc.int/climate-action/momentum-for-change/activity-database/momentum-for-change-energy-efficient-cook-stoves-for-siaya-communities--kenya#:~:text=This has severe health impacts,deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions.&text=This project introduces energy-efficient,which can be used separately. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gitau, J. K., Mutune, J., Sundberg, C., Mendum, R., & Njenga, M. (2019). Implications on livelihoods and the environment of uptake of gasifier cook stoves among Kenya’s Rural Households. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gitau, J. K., Sundberg, C., Mendum, R., Mutune, J., & Njenga, M. (2019). Use of biochar-producing gasifier cookstove improves energy use efficiency and indoor air quality in rural households. Energies, 12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12224285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hafner, J. M., Uckert, G., Hoffmann, H. K., Rosenstock, T. S., Sieber, S., & Kimaro, A. A. (2020). Efficiency of Three-Stone Fire and Improved Cooking Stoves using on-farm and off-farm fuels in semi-arid Tanzania. Energy for Sustainable Development, 59(December), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.10.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hafner, J., Uckert, G., Graef, F., Hoffmann, H., Kimaro, A. A., Sererya, O., & Sieber, S. (2018). A quantitative performance assessment of improved cooking stoves and traditional three-stone-fire stoves using a two-pot test design in Chamwino, Dodoma, Tanzania. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9da3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hayyat, U., Khan, M. U., Farooq, M., Sultan, M., Amjed, M. A., Liu, G., Chunyu, X., Riaz, F., & Alkhedher, M. (2024). Recent developments and challenges in biomass cookstove. Energy Reports, 12(October 2023), 2193–2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.08.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jain, T., & Sheth, P. N. (2019). Design of energy utilization test for a biomass cook stove: Formulation of an optimum air flow recipe. Energy, 166, 1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jeffery, S., Abalos, D., Prodana, M., Bastos, A. C., Van Groenigen, J. W., Hungate, B. A., & Verheijen, F. (2017). Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environmental Research Letters, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kshirsagar, M. P., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2014). A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Manoj Kumar, Sachin Kumar, & Tyagi, S. K. (2013). Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Masinde, J. M. (2020). Waste biomass for local sustainable development: a case study in Kenya. July 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Energy - Republic of Kenya. (2019). Assessment of the Supply and Demand of Cooking Solutions at the Household Level. 43. https://rise.esmap.org/data/files/library/kenya/Electricity Access/Kenya_MoE-Kenya Cooking Sector Study_2019.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Njenga, M., Iiyama, M., Jamnadass, R., Helander, H., Larsson, L., De Leeuw, J., Neufeldt, H., Röing De Nowina, K., & Sundberg, C. (2016). Gasifier as a cleaner cooking system in rural Kenya. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Performance Evaluation Biomass Cooking Stoves Used At. (2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pole F.N., B. Nguma, & N. Mohammed. (2014). Status of Coconut Farming and the Associated Challenges in Kenya. Cord, 30(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.37833/cord.v30i2.79 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sharma, M., & Dasappa, S. (2017). Emission reduction potentials of improved cookstoves and their issues in adoption: An Indian outlook. Journal of Environmental Management, 204, 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Stoner, O., Lewis, J., Martínez, I. L., Gumy, S., Economou, T., & Adair-Rohani, H. (2021). Household cooking fuel estimates at global and country level for 1990 to 2030. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26036-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sutar, K. B., Kohli, S., Ravi, M. R., & Ray, A. (2015). Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1128–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Timothy, N., Joseph, G., Nellie, O., & Emily, K. (2022). Sustainable biomass energy production and utilization in sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Kenya. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 14(4), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.5897/jhf2022.0689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Torres-Rojas, D., Lehmann, J., Hobbs, P., Joseph, S., & Neufeldt, H. (2011). Biomass availability, energy consumption and biochar production in rural households of Western Kenya. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(8), 3537–3546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNEP. (2019). Sustainability of Sugarcane Bagasse Briquettes and Charcoal Value Chains in Kenya. Technical Report. www.globalbioenergy.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gbep/docs/AG2/Ethiopia_and_Kenya/GBEP-Kenya-Technical-Report-ISBN.pdf%0D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNSD. (2021). the Energy Progress Report 2021. Iea, 158–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wamalwa, P., Okoti, M., Mutembei, H., Mandila, B., & Kisiangani, B. (2022). Adoption of Improved Biomass Cook Stoves: Case Study of Baringo and West Pokot Counties in Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 12(02), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2022.122003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Competency and Challenges of BTLED-ICT Students in 2D Animation: An Analytical Study
• Slope Stability Assessment: A Case Study of Embankments Along OMU-Aran-Ilorin Road, Nigeria
• Advancements in Precursors, Materials, Deposition Techniques for Thin Film Research in Electronic Devices: A Mini Review
• “Empowering Indian Women through Entrepreneurship: A Study on Kolkata”
• Impact of Mental Mathematics Proficiency on Job Performance Among Seconadry Schools Teachers in Emohua and Port Hacourt City