00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

AI-Driven Diagnostic Imaging: Hybrid CNN-GNN Models for Early Detection of Cancer from Pathological Images

Authors

Umerah Anthony Tochukwu

Department of Computer Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State Nigeria (NG)

Azaka Maduabuchuku

Department of Computer science, Osadebay University Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria (NG)

Osita Miracle Nwakeze

Department of Computer Science, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli, Anambra State (NG)

Obaze Caleb Akachukwu

Department of Computer science, Osadebay University Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria (NG)

Ibeh Sylvarine Chinasa

Department of Computer Science, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli (NG)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1409000070

Subject Category: Artificial intelligent

Volume/Issue: 14/9 | Page No: 579-588

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-09

Published: 2025-10-09

Abstract

Abstract: The early and accurate detection of cancer from histopathological images is crucial for the improvement patient outcomes in precision oncology because conventional diagnostic methods usually suffer from subjectivity and high variability, while traditional deep learning approaches, though effective, are limited in capturing both local morphological details and global tissue context simultaneously. In order to address this challenge, this study proposes a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network–Graph Neural Network (CNN–GNN) framework that integrates patch-level visual feature extraction with graph-based relational learning for cancer detection. The study adhered to the Agile approach and publicly available datasets, CAMELYON16 and CAMELYON17, were used, which consist of Whole-Slide Images (WSIs) and professional annotations of normal and metastatic tissue areas. Stain normalization, patch extraction, data augmentation, and graph construction were used as preprocessing steps, which provided both CNN and GNN pipelines with high-quality inputs. DenseNet121 was used in place of CNN backbone to extract patch embedding whereas Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) was used to learn the spatial and contextual relationship among patches. The last distinction came by combining CNN and GNN embedding by a multilayer perceptron classifier. The effectiveness of the given architecture was proven by experiment results. CNN model reached an accuracy of 88.9% with an F1-score of 89.2% and GNN model reached a higher accuracy of 90.7% and F1-score of 91.0%. The hybrid CNNGNN model notably outdid the two baselines, achieving a test accuracy of 95.4%, precision of 94.7%, recall of 95.9%, F1-score of 95.3% and AUC of 96.4%. Therefore, the hybrid CNNGNN model that is suggested provides a scalable, trustworthy, and clinically feasible solution to computational pathology. Along with attention mechanisms, enhanced GNN variants, and data on multiple institutions, future extensions could help to expand the overall generalizability and clinical uptake.

Keywords

Histopathological Images, Cancer Detection, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Graph Neural Networks (GNN), Hybrid Deep Learning

Downloads

References

1. Ashok, A., Hitesh, O., Naidu, G. P., Abhinav, B., Krishna, C. P. V., & Nair, M. (2024). An Integrated Study on Convolutional Neural Networks and Graph Neural Networks for Brain Tumor Classification from MRI Images. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3675888.3676095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandi, P., Geessink, O., Manson, Q., Van Dijk, M., Balkenhol, M., Hermsen, M., ... & van der Laak, J. (2019). From detection of individual metastases to classification of lymph node status at the patient level: The CAMELYON17 challenge. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38(2), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2867350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bejnordi, B. E., Veta, M., van Diest, P. J., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., ... & van der Laak, J. A. (2017). Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer. JAMA, 318(22), 2199–2210. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dhiman, G., Juneja, S., Viriyasitavat, W., Mohafez, H., Hadizadeh, M., Islam, M. A., & Gulati, K. (2022). A Novel Machine-Learning-Based Hybrid CNN Model for Tumor Identification in Medical Image Processing. MDPI Sustainability, 14(3), 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Grand Challenge. (2025). CAMELYON17 Dataset. Retrieved from https://camelyon17.grand-challenge.org/Data/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hamdi, M., Senan, E. M., Jadhav, M. E., Olayah, F., Awaji, B., & Alalayah, K. M. (2023). Hybrid Models Based on Fusion Features of a CNN and Handcrafted Features for Accurate Histopathological Image Analysis for Diagnosing Malignant Lymphomas. MDPI Diagnostics, 13(13), 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13132258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., ... & Sánchez, C. I. (2017). A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 42, 60–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Litjens, G., Sánchez, C. I., Timofeeva, N., Hermsen, M., Nagtegaal, I., Kovacs, I., ... & van der Laak, J. (2018). Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 5537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22811-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Macenko, M., Niethammer, M., Marron, J. S., Borland, D., Woosley, J. T., Guan, X., & Thomas, N. E. (2009). A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis. 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 1107–1110. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nusrat, J. N., Sultana, F., & Anika, S. (2024). Skin Cancer Detection: Leveraging Hybrid Deep Learning Models and Traditional Machine Learning Classifiers. ACM ICCA 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3723178.3723280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nwakeze, O. M., Okeke, O. C., & Mgbeafulike, I. J. (2025). Intelligent robotic object grasping system using computer vision and deep reinforcement learning techniques. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(3), 511–521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Patel, N. D., Jain, V. K., Yadav, A. K., Bano, S., & Rajpoot, D. S. (2024). Brain Tumor Detection from MRI Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks. ACM IC3 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3675888.3676039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Prome, R., Adepoju, A., & Nwakaeze, O. M. (2024). Global cancer burden and the role of early detection: A review of diagnostic innovations. Elsevier Journal of Cancer Informatics, 38(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcancerin.2024.01.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sureshkumar, V., Prasad, R. S. N., Balasubramaniam, S., Jagannathan, D., Daniel, J., & Dhanasekaran, S. (2024). Breast Cancer Detection and Analytics Using Hybrid CNN and Extreme Learning Machine. MDPI Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14(8), 792. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2023). Benchmarking deep learning models on CAMELYON datasets for breast cancer metastasis detection. MDPI Cancers, 15(4), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.