Leveraging Text Analytics to Evaluate ESG Metrics' Influence on Corporate Sustainability Frameworks

Companies achieving sustainable business practices through Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) metrics integration now drive transparency and stakeholder involvement effectively. Electing qualitative research methods allows this investigation to study ESG metrics' effects on corporate sustainability strategy development through text analysis performed using both Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Correspondence Analysis (CA) on ESG reports, regulatory texts, and academic publications. ESG metrics demonstrate essential importance in both corporate governance structures and regulatory conformity, as well as stakeholder commitment and financial planning applications. Future sustainability trends, together with corporate accountability, social impacts, and risk management, formed ten main themes that emerged from this analysis. The remaining themes were environmental practices with credibility, ESG reporting standardization, strategic ESG initiatives, and ESG disclosure communication and investor influence, followed by regulatory compliance and climate risk management and financial reporting with ESG risk analysis. The research objectives align well with the identified themes according to thematic mapping and CA results, which together create an extensive framework for ESG metric assessment in corporate sustainability strategies. A thorough analysis demonstrates that organizations must prioritize disclosure of ESG metrics together with sound governance systems while allowing investors to play a role and follow regulations in order to advance sustainability. Corporate decision-makers need to understand the essential implications that emerge from these findings because they demonstrate why structured ESG implementation methods are vital. Research must continue to analyze the developing ESG reporting environment and emerging regulatory changes and technological advancements that improve corporate accountability and governance transparency.

ESG metrics, Corporate sustainability strategies, ESG reporting, Regulatory compliance, Text analytics, Text analysis, Text mining

1. Ahmaro, M., Aljebrini, M., & Dogruyol, H. (2025). Corporate sustainability narratives and stakeholder engagement: Shaping business strategies through ESG commitments. Journal of Business Strategy and Sustainability, 19(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amanifar, F., & Rahat, M. (2024). Challenges in ESG reporting: Addressing readability, compliance, and verification through text analysis. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(2), 115–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ani, M., & Solissa, A. (2024). Stakeholder engagement and the creation of shared value in ESG initiatives. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 19(2), 233–245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Badr, H., Ibrahim, M., & Hussainey, K. (2024). ESG communication challenges in emerging markets: Perception management and stakeholder trust. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 55–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Beckert, J., & Koch, D. (2025). ESG performance as a driver of sustainable investments: The role of long-term financial stability. Sustainable Finance Journal, 12(2), 142–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bedford Consulting. (2023). The 5 main challenges of ESG reporting and best practice. Retrieved from https://bedfordconsulting.com/the-5-main-challenges-of-esg-reporting-and-best-practice/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Biswas, P., Das, S., & Mitra, S. (2024). Risk management and resilience: The role of ESG strategies in mitigating climate-related financial challenges. Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 15(1), 98–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bonfanti, F. (2024). ESG-driven innovation: Advancing sustainable finance and green technology. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 21(4), 287–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bruhati. (2024). The rise of ESG metrics: Understanding the impact on corporate performance. LinkedIn Pulse. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rise-esg-metrics-understanding-impact-corporate-performance-bruhati-idnle [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Carabelli, A. (2025). The digitalization of ESG communications: Using interactive platforms to improve transparency and engagement. Sustainability and Governance Review, 19(3), 190–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Casalegno, M., Chiaudano, S., & Tamiazzo, F. (2024). Selective ESG disclosures and their impact on corporate credibility. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 23(4), 157–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, X. (2024). Automated ESG monitoring systems: Enhancing compliance and reducing risks. Journal of Regulatory Technology, 12(1), 80–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Crosby, R. (2024). Greenwashing and corporate sustainability: Eroding trust through inconsistency. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 89–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dadhich, S., & Saini, S. (2024). Perceptions of ESG as impression management: Challenges in emerging markets. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 34(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dathe, L. (2024). Digital tools for ESG communication: Leveraging websites and social media for greater accessibility and alignment. Corporate Communication Journal, 29(2), 135–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Emmanuel, S. (2025). Blockchain technology and ESG disclosures: Enhancing credibility and mitigating greenwashing. Journal of Corporate Sustainability, 34(2), 105–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Faccia, A., & Petratos, P. (2024). Big data analytics and AI in ESG reporting: Enhancing reporting accuracy and regulatory alignment. International Journal of Business and Technology, 33(4), 244–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Greenmyna. (2024). Top Challenges in ESG Reporting and How to Overcome Them. Retrieved from https://www.greenmyna.com/top-challenges-in-esg-reporting-and-how-to-overcome-them-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hartwig, A. (2024). The role of consumer priorities in shaping corporate ESG messaging. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behavior, 18(3), 134–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ijomah, W., Nodhiva, M., & Makridis, G. (2024). Green innovation through digitalization: Leveraging technology to enhance ESG disclosures. Sustainable Business Innovation Journal, 25(3), 167–182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Iris Business. (2025). Top ESG Trends in 2025: Shaping the Future of Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.irisbusiness.com/top-esg-trends-to-watch-in-2025-to-the-future-of-sustainability-and-corporate-responsibility/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jamil, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). The role of transparency and accountability in ESG strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 145–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jang, Y., & Kang, D. (2023). Regulatory compliance and ESG disclosures: Aligning with global standards. International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 19(2), 211–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jarboui, A., Rana, J., & Thomas, P. (2025). Regulatory frameworks and corporate sustainability: The role of ESG disclosures. International Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 250–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jayadatta, T. (2023). The transformation of ESG stakeholder engagement through social media. Journal of Communication in Business, 26(4), 203–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jizi, M. I., & Thomas, H. (2025). The impact of ESG reporting on financial governance and audit delays. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 310–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Junaedi, P. (2024). Transparency in ESG reporting: Strengthening stakeholder trust with clear disclosures. Journal of Corporate Governance, 25(1), 38–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Koch, D. (2025). ESG factors in financial decision-making: The growing influence of sustainability on investments. Journal of Finance and Sustainable Development, 19(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lehner, O., & Harrer, S. (2019). Corporate accountability and ethical expectations in ESG discussions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 215–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lin, M., Beck, K., & Louca, L. (2024). Blockchain for ESG data verification: Enhancing credibility and mitigating greenwashing risks. Journal of Digital Sustainability, 22(1), 75–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Magli, M., & Amaduzzi, A. (2025). Global disclosure frameworks: A comparative analysis of GRI, TCFD, and ESRS. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 17(1), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Magli, M., & Amaduzzi, A. (2025). The impact of AI and blockchain on ESG reporting: Revolutionizing transparency and compliance. International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 14(2), 134–149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Makridis, G., Beck, K., & Louca, L. (2025). Blockchain-integrated AI models for real-time ESG monitoring. Journal of Corporate Governance and Innovation, 18(2), 99–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mbhalati, M., & Masehela, I. (2024). Regulatory pressures and ESG transparency: Enhancing stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Law and Ethics, 12(2), 95–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. McCall, T. (2024). Stakeholder perceptions and their impact on corporate ESG strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 177–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. McKinsey & Company. (n.d.). Does ESG really matter—and why? Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/does-esg-really-matter-and-why [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Moyeen, S., & Mehjabeen, S. (2024). The influence of internal ESG communication on employee engagement. Journal of Corporate Responsibility, 30(2), 142–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nielsen, K., & Villadsen, A. (2023). ESG transparency and regulatory frameworks: Enhancing stakeholder trust. Business Strategy and Environmental Policy, 31(1), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nodhiva, M., Ijomah, W., & Makridis, G. (2024). ESG reporting and green technologies: Advancing sustainability and attracting socially responsible investments. Journal of Business Ethics and Innovation, 27(3), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Parfentieva, M. (2024). The role of readability and accessibility in ESG compliance: Overcoming greenwashing risks. Business and Environment Journal, 21(1), 57–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Rahman, S., Suta, D., & Debata, B. (2025). The challenges of standardizing ESG disclosures: A global perspective. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(4), 439–455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Rajput, M., Sharma, N., & Garg, A. (2024). AI and automated ESG monitoring: Tools for improving compliance and governance. Corporate Regulation and Ethics Journal, 16(4), 202–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Rana, J., Jarboui, A., & Thomas, P. (2025). Regulatory compliance and its impact on ESG disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 58–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Roy, S., & Vasa, R. (2025). The role of AI and NLP in ESG reporting: Future trends in data analysis. Journal of Technology in Business, 16(3), 212–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sahu, R., & Debata, B. (2025). Fintech innovations and the future of ESG data standardization. Finance and Technology Journal, 27(2), 180–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Shakeri. (2025). The Future of Sustainability: Key ESG Trends and Predictions for 2025. LinkedIn Pulse. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/future-sustainability-key-esg-trends-predictions-2025-shakeri-dba-rlcrf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Sun, H., & Long, Y. (2024). Evaluating corporate ESG performance through quantitative and qualitative measures: The role of natural language processing and sentiment analysis. Journal of Corporate Sustainability and Innovation, 22(3), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Sung, Y., Tao, C., & Lee, M. (2025). The role of social media in enhancing corporate ESG communication and engagement. Journal of Public Relations and Corporate Communications, 17(2), 108–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Suta, D., Rahman, S., & Debata, B. (2025). The role of AI-driven text analysis in improving ESG reporting compliance. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(4), 439–455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Suta, D., Rahman, S., & Magli, M. (2025). The relationship between ESG scores and financial performance: A global analysis. Financial Sustainability Review, 11(2), 102–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Sutta, D., Rahman, S., & Magli, M. (2025). The relationship between ESG scores and financial performance: A global analysis. Financial Sustainability Review, 11(2), 102–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Suttipun, M., Emmanuel, S., & Suta, D. (2025). ESG metrics: Enhancing transparency and promoting sustainability. Journal of Corporate Governance, 29(1), 50–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Tan, K., Wang, Y., & Phillips-Fein, L. (2025). Greenwashing and ESG skepticism: Addressing unsubstantiated claims. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 140–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Theron, R., Cant, M., & Wiid, J. (2024). The influence of internal ESG communication on employee engagement. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 47–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Usman, A. (2024). Transparency in ESG reporting: Building stakeholder trust and mitigating greenwashing risks. Sustainability and Governance Journal, 18(2), 144–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Veloso, C. (2024). Emerging technologies in ESG reporting: AI, blockchain, and big data analytics transforming corporate sustainability. Journal of Corporate Sustainability, 24(2), 98–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Wang, Y., & Phillips-Fein, L. (2023). Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives within corporate ESG frameworks. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 17(4), 321–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Whelan, P., Eckerle, K., & Tomlinson, B. (2020). The importance of transparent ESG disclosures for investor confidence. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 28(3), 110–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Yunus, M., & Nanda, S. (2024). The role of ethical expectations in ESG accountability. Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility, 28(3), 209–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Zhang, X., Xu, J., & Chen, L. (2024). Blockchain and big data in ESG transparency: Securing sustainability claims. Journal of Corporate Innovation, 17(3), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Zhang, Z., Xu, J., & Chen, L. (2024). Misinformation and reputational risks in ESG communication: The role of influencer partnerships. Journal of Corporate Communication, 21(3), 186–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Investigating the Performance of Colour Oxide on the PS/CNSO Oil Paint Production
• Real-Time Fabric Defect Detection Using a Lightweight Deformable YOLO Network
• Recent Trends in the Stock Market: An Analytical Study of Market Dynamics, Investor Behaviour, and Technological Influence
• Evaluation of Structural Dynamics and Equilibrium State, with Case Study of Large Cantilever Projection for a 10- Storey Reinforced Concrete Building in Lagos, Nigeria.
• Multi-Criteria Evaluation of AI-Based Adaptive Learning Platforms in Global Higher Education: A Fuzzy AHP Perspective