Development of stimuli-responsive polymeric hydrogels and their applications

Electro-responsive nanocomposite hydrogels based on gelatin, partially neutralized acrylic acid (PAAc), and acid-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH) were developed and evaluated as potential smart drug delivery systems. The successful functionalization of pristine MWCNTs was confirmed by the shift in characteristic X-ray diffraction (XRD) peaks, while the presence of MWCNT-COOH peaks in the nanocomposite hydrogel verified their effective incorporation into the polymer matrix. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct morphological changes following acid functionalization and demonstrated the uniform dispersion of MWCNT-COOH within the hydrogel network, resulting in a smooth and homogeneous surface. Swelling studies showed that increasing MWCNT-COOH content reduced the swelling percentage in the absence of an electric field, whereas the application of a 10 V electric field significantly enhanced swelling, confirming the electro-responsive nature of the hydrogels. In vitro hemolysis assays indicated excellent blood compatibility, highlighting their suitability for biomedical applications. The electro-responsive release of vitamin B₁₂ was strongly influenced by the ionic strength of the release medium, applied voltage, and MWCNT-COOH concentration. Furthermore, drug release behavior was systematically optimized using response surface methodology based on a central composite design. Overall, the developed Gelatin-g-PAAc/MWCNT-COOH nanocomposite hydrogels exhibit favorable structural, swelling, biocompatible, and electro-responsive characteristics, making them promising candidates for the design of advanced electrically controlled drug delivery systems.

Nanocomposite, hydrogel, electro-responsive, drug delivery, MWCNTs.

1. Lutolf, M.P. & Hubbell, J.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 23 (1), 47-55, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Pratt, A.B., & Weber, F.E. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 86 (1), 27-36, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Nuttelman, C.R., et al. Matrix Biol. 24 (30), 208-218, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Xiang, Y., et al. Eur. Polym. J. 42 (9), 2125-2132, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Risbud, M.V., et al. J. Control. Rel. 68 (1), 23-30, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anal, A.K., et al. Recent Pat. Endocr. Metab. Immune Drug Discov. 1 (1), 83-90, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Qiu, Y., & Park, K. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 53 (3), 321-339, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Berner, B., & Dinh, S.M. Electronically Controlled Drug Delivery, CRC Press, Chicago, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boruah, M., et al. Adv. Polym. Tech. 32 (S1), E520–E530, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, G., et al. Carbon 42 (4), 753-759, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boruah, M., et al. Polym. Compos. 35 (1), 27-36, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, G., et al. Polymer 44 (6), 1781-1784, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Yang, S., et al. Carbon 43 (4), 827-834, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Xiao, Y., et al. J. Mater. Chem. 22 (16), 8076-8082, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lizundia, E., et al. Macromol. Biosci. 12 (7), 870-881, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dubois, P., & Alexandre, M. Adv. Eng. Mater. 8 (3), 147-154, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shiga, T. Adv. Polym. Sci. 134, 131-163, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Teng, X.W., & Yang, H. J. Mater. Chem. 14 (4), 774-779, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. O'Connell, M.J., et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 342 (3-5), 265-271, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Coleman, J.N., et al. Carbon 44 (9), 1624-1652, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ross-Murphy, S.B. Polymer 33 (12), 2622-2627, 1992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Brodsky, B., & Ramshaw, J.A.M. Matrix. Biol. 15 (8), 545-554, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kawai, K., et al. Biomaterials 21 (5), 489-499. 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zhao, F., et al. Biomaterials 23 (15), 3227-3234, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Bigi, A., et al. Biomaterials 19 (7-9), 739-744, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kulkarni, R.V., et al. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 115 (2), 1180-1188, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Banga, A.K., & Chien, Y.W. Pharm. Res. 10 (5), 697-702, 1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kim, S.Y., & Lee, Y.M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 74 (7), 1752-1761, 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tanaka, T., et al. Science 218 (4571), 467-469, 1982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, B., et al. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 22 (1), 27-106, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Singh, B., et al. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 22 (3), 215-294, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sauzet, C., et al. Int. J. Pharm. 378 (1), 23-29, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mutyaba, M.R., et al. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 37 (3-4), 434-441, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Leonardi, D., et al. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 48 (3), 802-807, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Li, L., et al. J. Pharm. Sci. 26 (5), 929-937, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Boruah, M., et al. RSC Adv. 4 (83), 43865-43873, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Chen, J., et al. Science 282 (5386), 95-98, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Worsley, K.A., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (50), 18153-18158, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kokabi, M., et al. Eur. Polym. J. 43 (3), 773-781, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Purkayastha, M.D., et al. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61 (45), 10746-10756, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Bajpai, S.K., et al. Iran. Polym. J. 16 (8), 521-527, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. van Dijkhuizen-Radersma, R., et al. Biomaterials 23 (6), 1527-1536, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kim, B., et al. Macromol. Res. 11 (4), 291-295, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Bhattacharyya, S., et al. Biomacromolecules 9 (2), 505-509, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Neelgund, M.G., & Oki, A. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 (4), 3621-3629, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Harris, P.J.F., et al. Carbon nanotubes and related structures: new materials for the twenty-first century, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Salvetat, J.P. Understanding of carbon nanotubes, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Veerapandian, B., et al. Asian J. Sci. Res. 7 (2), 256-261, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pourjavadi, A., & Mahdavinia, G.R. Turk. J. Chem. 30 (5), 595-608, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Boruah, M., et al. Polym. Compos. DOI 10.1002/pc.22909, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Pourjavadi, A., & Doulabi, M. Solid State Ionics 257, 32-37. 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Murdan, S. J. Controlled Release 92 (1), 1-17, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Sawahata, K., et al. J. Controlled Release 14 (3), 253-262, 1990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Agnihotri, S.A., et al. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 96 (2), 301-311, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
• Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
• Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
• Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder