Effectiveness of Audit Committees in State-Owned Enterprises in Zimbabwe

This study critically examined the effectiveness of Audit Committees in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in Zimbabwe. Despite corporate governance frameworks aligned with international standards and the existence of Audit Committees in State-Owned Enterprises, many of them continue to experience financial mismanagement, weak internal controls, and limited accountability. To examine the effectiveness of Audit Committees in SOEs, the researchers assessed the impact of SOE’s independence, financial expertise, frequency of meetings, and their size to SOEs performance and their quality of financial reporting.
A qualitative research methodology was adopted in which data was generated from 17 participants picked from current and previous Audit Committee members for 24 State-Owned Enterprises. Data analysis was done using the thematic approach. The findings indicate that audit committee independence and financial expertise have a statistically significant positive relationship with quality of financial reporting and effectiveness of internal control. However, political interference and limited enforcement of governance regulations weaken overall audit committee performance. The findings have implications for policymakers, regulators, and boards seeking to enhance accountability and sustainability in state-owned enterprises.

Corporate governance, financial reporting quality, board oversight, public enterprises, internal controls, accountability

1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality: Evidence from the U.S. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 163–198. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bedard, J., Chtourou, S., & Courteau, L. (2016). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 1–23. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2016). Audit committee financial expertise, competing corporate governance mechanisms, and earnings management. Accounting Review, 91(1), 1–28. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hlophe, N., & Mabetha, L. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in the South African Financial Sector. Pretoria: SARB Prudential Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Klein, A. (2017). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 275–300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2017). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 694–720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lin, S., Li, Y., & Yang, J. (2017). Audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Owolabi, S. A., & Makinde, O. O. (2018). Audit committees and financial performance of state-owned enterprises in Africa. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 7(2), 102–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), pp. 419–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford University Press. (Added for citation alignment) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Public Entities Corporate Governance Act. (2018). Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tanlaka, E. F., & Aryal, S. (2025). Interpretivist constructivism: A valuable approach for qualitative nursing research. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13(1), pp. 8–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zimbabwe Auditor-General Report. (2022). Report on the accounts of state-owned enterprises for the financial year 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Public Governance Quality and Tax Compliance of SMEs in North-East Nigeria
• The Influence of Conflict Resolution on Job Commitment of Non- Teaching Staff in Public Universities in Southwest, Nigeria
• Effect of Curcumin on the Viability and Proliferation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (MDA-MB-231) Cells
• Predicting the Effect of Job Crafting on Employee Innovative Performance: Employee Adaptability as a Mediating Variable
• Institutional Conditions Linking Transparency to Anti-Corruption Accountability in the Philippine Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review