A Descriptive Survey of Technology’s Role in the Classroom and Effect on the Students’ Learning
Authors
Chukwudum, Chiemeka Prince
Department of Education foundation, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria (NG)
Ekwealor, Oluchukwu Uzoamaka
Department of Computer Science, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria (NG)
Eze, Chidi Nwauba
Department of Public Administration, Prowess University, USA. (US)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2024-11-06
Published: 2024-11-05
Abstract
In this paper, we carried out an in-depth study of the various roles of technology in classroom and the effects on the students’ learning. The study was conducted using descriptive survey research design. A sample of 300 teachers and students of secondary school was randomly selected from six secondary schools in Awka south Local Government Area of Anambra State, Nigeria. The data for this study was collected using questionnaire titled Technology’s Role and Effect Questionnaire (TREQ) which explored the roles of technology in classroom and the effects on the students’ learning. Data was analyzed using percentages and mean scores. Result shows a good number of ways in which technology has facilitated classroom teaching and learning. It also pointed out some of the positive and negative effects of technology on students’ learning while exploring the various means of overcoming these negative effects. The study concludes that although technology can make or mar students’ learning, its positive impact supersedes its adverse effect on students’ learning and as such recommended that technology-based education should be encouraged and adopted in various schools to promote students’ learning
Keywords
Classroom, Learning, E-learning, Education, Technology, Gamification
Downloads
References
1. Al-ruz, J. A. and Khasawneh, S., 2011. Jordanian preservice teachers’ and technology integration: A human resource development approach, Educational Technology and Society, vol. 14, pp.77-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bennett, S. et al, 2012.” Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study Computers & Education, 59 (2), pp. 524-534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Borthwick, A.C. et al. 2015 “ Special article personal wearable technologies in education: Value or villain? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chen, C. H., 2008. Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, vol. 102, pp.65-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dreimane, S. and Upenieks, R. 2022. ”Intersection of serious games and learning motivation for medical education: A literature review”. Research Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning, pp. 1938-1947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dudar, V.L. et al, 2021. “Use of modern technologies and digital tools in the context of distance and mixed learning Linguistics and Culture Review, 5 (S2), pp. 733-750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dufour, C. et al, 2010. “Rime simulation technologies in education: a link to modern engineering methods and practices”. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Engineering and Technology Edu (2010, March), pp. 7-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Harris, C. J. (2016) The effective integration of technology into schools’ curriculum. Distance Learning, (2), 27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Halverson, R., and Shapiro, R. B. (2012). Technologies for education and technologies for learners: How information technologies are (and should be) changing schools. Wisconsin Center for Educational Research (WCER), Working Paper, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Keengwe, J. and Bhargava, B., 2014.” Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education”, Education and Information Technologies, 19 (4), pp. 737-746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kovács P.T. et al 2015. Application of immersive technologies for education: State of the art International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), IEEE, pp. 283-288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kryukov, V. and Gorin, A. (2017). Digital technologies as education innovation at universities. Australian Educational Computing, 32(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Lacka, E. et al, 2021. “Exploring the role of Virtual Learning Environment and Social Media use in Higher Education”. Computers & Education, 163, Article 104099. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lin, M.-C., Wang, P.-Y. and Lin, I.-C., 2012. Pedagogy technology: A two-dimensional model for teachers’ ICT integration, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 43, pp.97- 108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Osadchyi, V.V., Valko, N.V., Kuzmich L.V., 2021. Using augmented reality technologies for STEM education organization. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (1), Article 012027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ozdamli, F. and Cavus, N. 2021, “Knowledge sharing technologies in higher education: Preferences of CIS students in Cyprus Education and Information Technologies, 26 (2), pp. 1833-1846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Penprase, B.E., 2018. “The fourth industrial revolution and higher education Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, 10, pp. 978-981 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rogers, P.L, 2000.” Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in educationJournal of educational computing research, 22 (4), pp. 455-472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J., Tondeur, J. and Zhu, C., 2011. Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 27, pp.160-172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Cyberverse: A Game-Based Learning Application for Cyber Security
- Design and Development of a Low Cost Smart Electronic School Bell
- Assessing the Effectiveness of TVET Training in Enhancing Youth Employability: A Case Study of Kisumu County, Kenya
- Social Penetration Analysis in Self-Disclosure of Online Loan Application Users to Their Partners
- Optimization of Maintenance Strategies in an Oil and Gas Production Facility to Minimize Maintenance Cost