00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Social Commerce: A Cost Reduction Strategic Tool for Sustaining Corporate Brands Globally. A Systematic Review Approach

Authors

Richard Amoasi

Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin China (GH)

Professor Xiaodan Wu

Koforidua Technical University, Koforidua Ghana. (GH)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.131028

Subject Category: Marketing Management

Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 235-248

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2024-11-23

Published: 2024-11-23

Abstract

Abstract: Social commerce has a strategic role in the sustainability of corporate brands. It has been discovered that little or no attention has been given to the cost-reduction strategy of social commerce to sustain corporate brands. Social commerce presents a three-way cost reduction (for manufacturers, members of trade, and consumers) to sustain brand performance globally. Social commerce works to reduce the cost of commercial advertising and other promotional elements. The study’s objective was to establish whether social commerce reduces the promotional cost of corporate brands and how that helps to sustain corporate brands. The study reviewed literature, with most spanning between 2010 and 2023, from the world and in both academia and industry. The study reveals that social commerce reduces the cost of managing corporate brands through brand trust and relationship building through social support and communities created on social media for brands. Social commerce has made many customers become company employees, resolving customer complaints and offering various forms of assistance to prospective and existing customers without adding cost to the company’s payroll. The study revealed again that customers now pay directly to disseminate brand messages shifting most of the communications cost to the customer. The cost of employing celebrities for product recommendation has been reduced due to both online and offline social commerce thus saving cost and increasing corporate brands profitability.

Keywords

Social commerce, cost reduction, brand sustainability, global, communications

Downloads

References

1. Abed, S. (2018). An empirical examination of Instagram as an social commerce channel. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 15, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alam F, Tao M, Lahuerta-Otero E and Feifei Z (2022) Let’s Buy with Social Commerce Platforms Through Social Media Influencers: An Indian Consumer Perspective. Front. Psychol. 13:853168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, M., Usman, M., Pham, N. T., Agyemang-Mintah, P., and Akhtar, N. (2020). Being ignored at work: understanding how and when spiritual leadership curbs workplace ostracism in the hospitality industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 91:1026-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Albert, N., and Merunka, D., (2013). The role of brand love in consumer- brand relationships, Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 258-266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bazi, S., Hajli, A., Hajli, N., Shanmugam, M., & Lin, X. (2019). Winning engaged consumers. Information Technology & People, ahead-of-p(ahead- of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-09-2018-0415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bruhn, M., Schnebelen, S., and Schäfer, D., (2014) Antecedents and Consequences of the quality of e-customer-to-customer interactions in B2B brand communities, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 164-176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Becerra, E.P., and Korgaonkar, P.K., (2011). Effects of trust beliefs on consumers' online intentions, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 936-962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cao, K., Xu, Y., Wu, Q., Wang, J., and Liu, C. (2021). Optimal channel and logistics service selection strategies in the e-commerce context. Electron Commer. Res. Appl. 48:101070. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cherrett, T., Dickinson, J., McLeod, F., Sit, J., Bailey, G., and Whittle, G. (2017). Logistics impacts of student online shopping – evaluating delivery consolidation to halls of residence. Transport. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 78, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chingning, W., and Zhang P., (Eds.), (2012). The evolution of social commerce: An examination from the people, business, technology, and information perspective, 31, Communications of the AIS (CAIS) (2012), pp. 105-127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Choi, B., and Lee, I. (2017). Trust in open versus closed social media: the relative influence of user- and marketer-generated content in social network services on customer trust. Telem. Inform. 34, 550–559. Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300- 314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cui, F., Lin, D., and Qu, H. (2018). The impact of perceived security and consumer innovativeness on e-loyalty in online travel shopping. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 35, 819–834. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Aleman, J.L., and Yague-Guillen, M.J., (2003). Development and validation of a brand trust scale, International Journal of Market Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 35-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Esmaeili, L., Mardani, S., Golpayegani, S. A. H., and Madar, Z. Z. (2020). A novel tourism recommender system in the context of social commerce. Expert Syst. Appl. 149:113301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Elliott, R.,and Yannopoulou, N., (2007). The nature of trust in brands: A psychosocial model, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 41, no. 9-10, pp. 988-998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fang, Y.-H., and Li, C.-Y. (2020). Leveraging sociability for trust building on social commerce sites. Electron Commer. Res. Appl. 40:100907. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Farivar, S.; Turel, O.; Yuan, Y. A trust-risk perspective on social commerce use: An examination of the biasing role of habit. Int. Res. 2017, 27, 586–607. [ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fu, S., Yan, Q., and Feng, G. C. (2018). Who will attract you? Similarity effect among users on online purchase intention of movie tickets in the social shopping context. Intern. J. Inform. Manag. 40, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Guo, Y., Bao, Y., Stuart, B. J., and Le-Nguyen, K. (2018). To sell or not to sell: exploring sellers’ trust and risk of chargeback fraud in cross-border electronic commerce. Info. Syst. J. 28, 359–383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hall, A., Towers, N., and Shaw, D. R. (2017). Understanding how Millennial shoppers decide what to buy: digitally connected unseen journeys. Intern. J. Retail Distribut. Manag. 45, 498–517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hansen, J. M., Saridakis, G., and Benson, V. (2018). Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers’ use of social media for transactions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 80, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hew, J. J., Leong, L. Y., Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., and Lee, V. H. (2019). The age of mobile social commerce: an Artificial Neural Network analysis on its resistances. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 144, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hu, T., Dai, H., and Salam, A. F. (2019). Integrative qualities and dimensions of social commerce: toward a unified view. Inf. Manag. 56, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hu, X., Chen, X., and Davidson, R. (2019). Social Support, Source Credibility, Social Influence, and Impulsive Purchase Behavior in Social Commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 23, 297–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. H. Y. Ha and H. Perks, (2005) Effects of consumer perceptions of brand experience on the web: Brand familiarity, satisfaction and brand trust, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 438-452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Habibi, M.R., Laroche, M., and Richard, M.O., (2014). The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media, Computers in Human Behaviour, vol. 37, pp. 152-161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hajli, N., Lin, X., Featherman, M., & Wang, Y. (2014). Social Word of Mouth: How Trust Develops in the Market. International Journal of Market Research, 56(6), 673-689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hajli, N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 183-191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hajli, N., & Mohana Shanmugamb, Savvas Papagiannidis, Debra Zahay, M.-O. R. (2017). Branding-co- creation- with-members-of-online-bran_2017_Journal-of-Business-Re.pdf. Journal of Business Research, (70), 136–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hajli, N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M. O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Han, H., Xu, H., and Chen, H. (2018). Social commerce: a systematic review and data synthesis. Electron Commer. Res. Appl. 30, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hsu, L., (2019). Building Brand-Fan Relationships in Social Commerce Contexts: Mediators of Online Brand Relationships. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol 14 / Issue 2, 106-123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Jeon, H., Jang, J., and Barrett, E. B. (2017). Linking website interactivity to consumer behavioral intention in an online travel community: the mediating role of utilitarian value and online trust. J. Q. Assurance Hosp. Tour. 18, 125– 148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Kanani, R., and Glavee-Geo, R. (2021). Breaking the uncertainty barrier in social commerce: the relevance of seller and customer-based signals. Electron Commer. Res. Appl. 48:101059. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kawasaki, T., Wakashima, H., and Shibasaki, R. (2021). The use of e-commerce and the COVID-19 outbreak: a panel data analysis in Japan. Transp. Policy 118,88–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kim, Y., and Peterson, R. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of online trust relationships in e-commerce. J. Interact. Mark. 38, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Laz˘aroiu G, Neguri¸t˘a O, Grecu I,˘Grecu G and Mitran PC (2020). Consumers’ Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions. Front. Psychol. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Liang, T.P., & Turban, (2011) E., Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16 (2), pp. 5-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Liang, T.P.; Ho, Y.T.; Li, Y.W.; Turban, E. What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2011, 16(16), 69–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lien, C. H., Wu, J. J., Chien, S. H., and Lee, C. Y. (2017). Anxious attachment, relational embeddedness, trust, co-production, and performance: an empirical study in online business-to-business relationships. Telemat. Inform. 34, 1514–1523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lin, J., Guo, J., Turel, O., and Liu, S. (2020). Purchasing organic food with social commerce: an integrated food-technology consumption values perspective. Int.J. Manag. 51:102033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. López-Miguens, M. J., and Vázquez, E. G. (2017). An integral model of e-loyalty from the consumer’s perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lu, W. Fan, M. Zhou Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research Computers in Human Behavior, 56 (2016), pp. 225-237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Lam, H. K. S., Yeung, A. C. L., Lo, C. K. Y., and Cheng, T. C. E. (2019). Should firms invest in social commerce? An integrative perspective. Inf. Manag. 56:1031-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Lee, A. R., Son, S.-M., and Kim, K. K. (2016). Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue: a stress perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Leong, L. Y., Hew, T. S., Ooi, K. B., and Chong, A. Y. L. (2020). Predicting the antecedents of trust in social commerce – A hybrid structural equation modelling with neural network approach. J. Bus. Res. 110, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Li, C. Y. (2019). How social commerce constructs influence customers’ social shopping intention? An empirical study of a social commerce website. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 144, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Li, C.-Y. (2017). How social commerce constructs influence customers’ social shopping intention? An empirical study of a social commerce website. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Liao, S. H., Widowati, R., and Hsieh, Y. C. (2021). Investigating online social media users’ behaviors for social commerce recommendations. Technol. Soc. 66:1016-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Lin, X., Li, Y., & Wang, X. (2017). Social Commerce Research: Definition, Research Themes and the Trends. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 190-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Molinillo, S., Anaya-Sánchez, R., and Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2020). Analyzing the effect of social support and community factors on customer engagement and its impact on loyalty behaviors toward social commerce websites. Comput. Hum. Behav. 108:1059-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Molinillo, S., Gómez-Ortiz, B., Pérez-Aranda, J., and Navarro-García, A. (2017). Building customer loyalty: the effect of experiential state, the value of shopping, and trust and perceived value of service on online clothes shopping. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 35, 156–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Moody, G. D., Lowry, P. B., and Galletta, D. F. (2017). It’s complicated: explaining the relationship between trust, distrust, and ambivalence in online transaction relationships using polynomial regression analysis and response surface analysis. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 26, 379–413. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Mou, J., and Cohen, J. F. (2017). Trust and online consumer health service success: a longitudinal study. Inform. Dev. 33, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Mou, J., and Shin, D. (2018). Effects of social popularity and time scarcity on online consumer behaviour regarding smart healthcare products: an eye-tracking approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Ng, C. S.-P. (2013). Intention to purchase on social commerce websites across cultures: A cross-regional study. Information & Management, 50(8), 609-620. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Oliveira, T., Alhinho, M., Rita, P., and Dhillon, G. (2017). Modelling and testing consumer trust dimensions in e-commerce. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Ozturk, A. B., Nusair, K., Okumus, F., and Singh, D. (2017). Understanding mobile hotelbooking loyalty: an integration of privacy calculus theory and trust-risk framework. Inform. Syst. Front. 19, 753–767. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Pantano, E., and Gandini, A. (2017). Exploring the forms of sociality mediated by innovative technologies in retail settings. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Pratono, A. H. (2018). From social network to firm performance: the mediating effect of trust, selling capability and pricing capability. Manag. Res. Rev. 41, 680–700. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Raza, A., Usman, M., and Ali, M. (2022). Examining how and when Facebook intensive use shapes users’ online pro-social behaviors. Telemat. Inform.67:1017-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Xicheng Yin, X., Wang, H., Xia, Q., and Gu, Q. (2019). How Social Interaction Affects Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: A Cultural Perspective, Sustainability 2019, 11, 242-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Şahin, A. Zehir, C., and Kitapçı, H., (2011). The effects of brand experiences, trust and satisfaction on building brand loyalty: An empirical research on global brands, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1288-1301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Sharma, S., Menard, P., & Mutchler, L. A. (2019). Who to Trust? Applying Trust to Social Commerce. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 59, pp. 32–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Sheikh, Z., Yezheng, L., Islam, T., Hameed, Z., & Khan, I. U. (2019). Impact of social commerce constructs and social support on social commerce intentions. Information Technology & People, 32(1), 68–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Shanmugam, M.; Sun, S.; Amidi, A.; Khani, F.; Khani, F. The applications of social commerce constructs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Swimberghe, K.R., Astakhova, M., and Wooldridge, B.R., (2014). A new dualistic approach to brand passion: Harmonious and obsessive, Journal of Business Research, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 2657-2665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Sullivan, Y.W.; Kim, D.J. Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 199–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Tajvidi, M., Richard, M.-O., Wang, Y., & Hajli, N. (2020). Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media. Journal of Business Research, 121, 476-486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. The Social Commerce Resolution; https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight/software-platforms/social-commerce- power-people [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Usman, M., and Ahmad, M. I. (2018). Parallel mediation model of social capital, learning and the adoption of best crop management practices: evidence from Pakistani small farmers. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 10, 589–607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Wang, C. C., Miao, J. T., Phelps, N. A., and Zhang, J. (2021). E-commerce and the transformation of the rural: the Taobao village phenomenon in Zhejiang Province. China. J. Rural Stud. 81, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Wang, Y., & Yu, C. (2017). Social interaction-based consumer decision-making model in social commerce: The role of word of mouth and observational learning. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 179–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Wang, X., Tajvidi, M., Lin, X., & Hajli, N. (2019). Towards an Ethical and Trustworthy Social Commerce Community for Brand Value Co-creation: A trust-Commitment Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Wang, Y.; Min, Q.; Han, S. Understanding the effects of trust and risk on individual behaviour toward social media platforms: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Wang, W., Chen, R. R., Ou, C. X., and Ren, S. J. (2019). Media or message, which is the king in social commerce?: an empirical study of participants’ intention to repost marketing messages on social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 176–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Williams, M. D. (2021). Social commerce and the mobile platform: payment and security perceptions of potential users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115:1055-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Xiang H, Chau KY, Iqbal W, Irfan M and Dagar V (2022). Determinants of Social Commerce Usage and Online Impulse Purchase: Implications for Business and Digital Revolution. Front. Psychol. 13:837042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Xu-Priour, D. L., Cliquet, G., and Palmer, A. (2017). The influence of buyers’ time orientation on online shopping behaviour: a typology. Intern. J. Electron. Commerce 21, 299–333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Yahia, I., Ben, Al-Neama, N., and Kerbache, L. (2018). Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. J. Retail Consum. Serv. 41, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Yang, X. (2021). Understanding consumers’ purchase intentions in social commerce through social capital: evidence from sem and fsqca. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 16, 1557–1570. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Yu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-C., Wang, Y., Lai, K. K., and Tajvidi, M. (2020). Towards building a value co-creation circle in social commerce. Comput. Hum. Behav.108:105476. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Yusuf, A. S., Che Hussin, A. R., and Busalim, A. H. (2018). Influence of e-WOM engagement on consumer purchase intention in social commerce. J. Serv. Mark 32, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Zafar, A. U., Qiu, J., Li, Y., Wang, J., and Shazad, M. (2021). The impact of social media celebrities’ posts and contextual interactions on impulse buying in social commerce. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115:106178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Zhang, M., Guo, L., Hu, M., & Liu, W. (2017). Influence of customer engagement with company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 229–240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Zhou, L., Zhang, P., & Zimmermann, H. D. (2013). Social commerce research: An integrated view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(2), 61–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Olivares, L.I.F., Cheneffusse, F.A.C., and Gil Grados, E.M.C., (2022). The Origins and Evolution of Social Commerce: Enhancing E-Commerce Platforms with Social Features. Proceedings of the 5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Kim S, Park H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2013, 33(2): 318-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Yin X, Wang H, Xia Q, et al. How social interaction affects purchase intention in social commerce: A cultural perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8): 24-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Trkman M, Trkman P. A framework for increasing business value from social media [J]. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 2018, 31(1): 1091-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Salvatori L, Marcantoni F. Social commerce: A literature review; proceedings of the 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI), F, 2015[C]. IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Ventre I, Mollá-Descals A, Frasquet M. Drivers of social commerce usage: a multi-group analysis comparing Facebook and Instagram [J]. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 021, 34(1): 570-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Zong Q J. A Review of Social Commerce Research [J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2013, 32(117-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Chiang I P, Lin K C, Huang C H, et al. Influence factors of people purchasing on social commerce sites[J]. Contemporary Management Research, 2019, 15(2): 69-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Barnes, S.J., and Böhringer, M. Continuance usage intention in micro-blogging services: The case of Twitter. Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, (ECIS 2009), Verona, Italy, June 8–9[C]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Chiu, C.-M.; Chiu, C.-S.; and Chang, H.-C. Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention [J]. Information Systems Journal. 2007, 17, 3: 271–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Crocker, J., and Canevello, A. Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008, 95, 3: 555–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Eastin, M.S., and LaRose, R. Alt. support: Modeling social support online [J].Computers in Human Behavior.2005, 21, 6: 977–992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. House, J.S. Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981[T]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Huang, K.-Y.; Nambisan, P.; and Uzuner, Ö. Informational support or emotional support: Preliminary study of an automated approach to analyze online support community contents, International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), St. Louis, MO,2010, December 12–15[C]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Maslow, A.H. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1954[T]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Morgan, R.M., and Hunt, S.D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing [J]. Journal of Marketing. 1994, 58, 3: 20–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Obst, P., and Stafurik, J. Online we are all able-bodied: Online psychological sense of community and social support found through membership of disability-specific Websites promotes well-being for people living with a physical disability [J]. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.2010, 20, 6: 525–531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Palmatier, R.W.; Dant, R.P.; Grewal, D.; and Evans, K.R. Factors influenc-ing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysi[J]. Journal of Marketing.2006, 70, 4: 136–153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Ravald, A., and Gronroos, C. The value concept and relationship marketing [J]. European Journal of Marketing. 1996, 30, 2: 19–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Shabbir, H.; Palihawadana, D.; and Thwaites, D. Determining the antecedents and consequences of donor-perceived relationship quality—A dimensional qualitative research approach [J]. Psychology & Marketing. 2007, 24, 3: 271–293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Shaw, L.H., and Gant, L.M. In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support [J]. Cyber Psychology & Behaviour. 2002, 5, 2: 157–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Xie, B. Multimodal computer-mediated communication and social sup-port among older Chinese Internet users [J]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008,13, 3: 728–750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Laurenceau, J.; Barrett, L.F.; and Pietromonaco, P.R. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998, 74, 5: 1238–1251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Gustafsson, A.; Johnson, M.D.; and Roos, I. The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69, 4: 210–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Nadeem W, Tan T M, Tajvidi M, et al. How do experiences enhance brand relationship performance and value co-creation in social commerce? The role of consumer engagement and self-brand-connection [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 171(120-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality [J]. The Accounting Review, 2016, 91(6): 1697-724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Yacob S, Erida E, Machpuddin A, et al. A model for the business performance of micro, small and medium enterprises: Perspective of social commerce and the uniqueness of resource capability in Indonesia [J]. Management Science Letters, 2021, 11(1): 101-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Goraya M A S, Jing Z, Shareef M A, et al. An investigation of the drivers of social commerce and e-word-of-mouth intentions: Elucidating the role of social commerce in E-business [J]. Electronic Markets, 2021, 31(1): 181-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. Sheikh, Z., Yezheng, L., Islam, T., Hameed, Z., & Khan, I. U. (2019). Impact of social commerce constructs and social support on social commerce intentions. Information Technology & People, 32(1), 68–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Gibreel, O., AlOtaibi, D. A., and Altmann, J. (2018). Social commerce development in emerging markets. Electron Commer. Res. Appl. 27, 152–162. [116] López-Miguens, M. J., and Vázquez, E. G. (2017). An integral model of e-loyalty from the consumer’s perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Hargadon, A. B., &Bechky, B. A. 2006. When collections of creative become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving12 at work. Organization Science, 17(4),484–500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Lu, B.; Fan,W.; Zhou, M. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Buys, L.; Mengersen, K.; Johnson, S.; van Buuren, N.; Chauvin, A. Creating a Sustainability Scorecard as a predictive tool for measuring the complex social, economic and environmental impacts of industries, a case study: Assessing the viability and sustainability of the dairy industry. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 133, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.