An Improved Method for Examining Solar PV Module Failure and Reliability Rate
Authors
Odigbo, Abigail Chidimma
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria (NG)
Obi, Obinna Kingsley
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria (NG)
Nwobu, Chinedu Chigozie
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria (NG)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1407000051
Subject Category: POWER ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
Volume/Issue: 14/7 | Page No: 421-431
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-08-07
Published: 2025-08-07
Abstract
Abstract- Failure, in general, refers to a situation where the system's performance is significantly impaired, usually dropping below a preset level, such as 80% of its nominal power output. This degradation is caused by a variety of factors, including physical damage, manufacturing defects, and environmental factors. The ability of the PV system to continuously generate electricity over its anticipated lifespan, even in the face of changing environmental conditions, is referred to as reliability. This includes weather resistance, performance, and the system's capacity to continue operating without significant malfunctions. A new method for examining the failure and dependability rate of a solar PV module was examined in this study. The method includes a reliability model called linear degradation model. A PV reliability model was designed based on degradation. On evaluating the model, it was applied to a practical case based on state-of- the-art parameter of crystalline silicon PV technology. This model uses time-dependent power variability and measured degradation rates to produce reliable data, including relevant and tenable power warranties. Examining the reliability and failure of the monocrystalline DSP 210 and polycrystalline SPP 280W PV modules was part of the strategy. With monocrystalline DSP 210, the computed power was 191.134 watts, whereas with polycrystalline DSP 210, it was 267.8 watts. Comparing them to the calculated power for the same model demonstrates their relative reliability. The cells' dependability indicates that they are reliant on the amount of solar radiation present during a specific time of day. Analytical tests and testing revealed that the panels' failure rate was significantly higher in some months than their reliability rate. The bright sunlight over those months was the cause of that.
Keywords
Peak Sun Hour, Solar PV model, short circuit and Open circuit
Downloads
References
1. Dunlop, E.D.; Halton, D.; Ossenbrink, H.A.; 20 years of life and more: where is the end of life of a PV module?, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005. Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Proceedings 2005, Page(s): 1593 - 1596. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Wohlgemuth. J, “Reliability of PV Systems, Reliability of Photovoltaic Cells, Modules, Components and Systems,” edited by Neelkanth G. Dhere, Proc. of SPIE ,Vol. 7048, 704802-1, (2008). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Wohlgemuth, John H., 2003.Long Term Photovoltaic Module Reliability,NCPV and Solar Program Review Meeting 2003, NREL/CD-520-33586 pp 179-183, http://www.physics.unc.edu/~cecil/laptopStuff/33586015.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Osterwald, C. R., and T. J. McMahon.. History of accelerated and qualification testing of terrestrial photovoltaic modules: A literature review. Progress in Photovoltaics 2009: Research and Applications 17, no. 1: 11-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. T. McMahon, G. Jorgensen, R. Hulstrom. “Module 30 Year Life: What Does it Mean and Is It Predictable/Achievable?,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory,Conference: National Center for Photovoltaics Program Review, Denver, CO (US), 04/17/2000--04/19/2000. 2000 Apr 11, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. http://www.osti.gov/bridge//product.biblio.jsp?query_id=0&page=0&osti_id=755637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Patil, R. B., Khalkar, A., Al-Dahidi, S., Pimpalkar, R. S., Bhandari, S., & Pecht, M. (2024). A reliability and risk assessment of solar photovoltaic panels using a failure mode and effects analysis approach: A case study. Sustainability, 16(10), 4183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Pimpalkar, R., Sahu, A., Patil, R. B., & Roy, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on failure modes and effect analysis of solar photovoltaic system. Materials Today: Proceedings, 77, 687-691. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Sonawane, P. R., Bhandari, S., Patil, R. B., & Al-Dahidi, S. (2023). Reliability and criticality analysis of a large-scale solar photovoltaic system using fault tree analysis approach. Sustainability, 15(5), 4609. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Abunima, H., & Teh, J. (2020). Reliability modeling of PV systems based on time-varying failure rates. IEEE Access, 8, 14367-14376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Sharma, V., & Chandel, S. S. (2013). Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 27, 753-767. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Jordan, D. C., Marion, B., Deline, C., Barnes, T., & Bolinger, M. (2020). PV field reliability status—Analysis of 100 000 solar systems. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 28(8), 739-754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Perveen, S., Ashfaq, H., & Asjad, M. (2019). Reliability assessment of solar photovoltaic systems based on fuzzy fault tree analysis. Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 8, 129-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Golnas, A. (2012, June). PV system reliability: An operator's perspective. In 2012 IEEE 38th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) PART 2 (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sayed, A., El-Shimy, M., El-Metwally, M., & Elshahed, M. (2019). Reliability, availability and maintainability analysis for grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems. Energies, 12(7), 1213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Alimi, O. A., Meyer, E. L., & Olayiwola, O. I. (2022). Solar photovoltaic modules’ performance reliability and degradation analysis—a review. Energies, 15(16), 5964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Formica, T. J., Khan, H. A., & Pecht, M. G. (2017). The effect of inverter failures on the return on investment of solar photovoltaic systems. IEEE Access, 5, 21336-21343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Alimi, O. A., Meyer, E. L., & Olayiwola, O. I. (2022). Solar photovoltaic modules’ performance reliability and degradation analysis—a review. Energies, 15(16), 5964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lawani, A. O., Adeleke, T. B., & Osuizugbo, I. C. (2024, November). Solar Photovoltaic Systems: A Review of Risks, Fault Detection, and Mitigation Strategies. In 2024 IEEE 5th International Conference on Electro-Computing Technologies for Humanity (NIGERCON) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Pandit, D., Nguyen, N., Elsaiah, S., & Mitra, J. (2021, September). Reliability evaluation of solar PV system incorporating insolation-dependent failure rates. In 2021 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Al Mahdi, H., Leahy, P. G., Alghoul, M., & Morrison, A. P. (2024, January). A review of photovoltaic module failure and degradation mechanisms: causes and detection techniques. In Solar (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 43-82). MDPI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shi, X., & Bazzi, A. M. (2015, September). Solar photovoltaic power electronic systems: Design for reliability approach. In 2015 17th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'15 ECCE-Europe) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Advanced Digital Communication Strategies: A Comprehensive Analysis
- Developing an Explainable AI System for Digital Forensics: Enhancing Trust and Transparency in Flagging Events for Legal Evidence
- The Global Impact of Government Censorship on Women’s Access to Information: A Literature Review
- "Reimagining Higher Education Workspaces: A Review on The Transformative Role of Digital Technology Adoption"
- Improved CSP Efficiency: Innovations and Challenges in Thermal Energy Storage Systems