State Estimation Method for Power System with a Large Number of Branches Using Voltage and Current as State Variables
Authors
Kyengrim Choe
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (KP)
Gukryol Ji
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (KP)
Yongmyong Kim
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (KP)
Unchol Jin
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (KP)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1408000175
Subject Category: Electric Power System
Volume/Issue: 14/8 | Page No: 1377-1385
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-20
Published: 2025-09-20
Abstract
Abstract- A power system state estimation is a key tool for a reliable and efficient management of electrical power. This paper presents based on new state variables a state estimation method for power system with a large number of branches. In this method, the node voltage and the active current and reactive current of branch are chosen as the state variables. Therefore, measurement functions of ampere and voltage are significantly simplified and no measurements transformation is needed in this method. The observability analysis indicates the proposed method can be used in power system with very limited measurements. Numerical tests on power system with the radial and meshed network show the real-time branch current measurements can significantly improve the accuracy and computation speed of estimation results.
Keywords
Newton–Raphson (NR) algorithm, branch current measurements, power system state estimation
Downloads
References
1. Lu CN, Teng JH, Liu W-H. Distribution system state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1995;10(1):229–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Lin Whei-Min, Teng Jen-Hao. State estimation for distribution systems with zero-injection constraints. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1996;11(1):518–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baran Mesut E, Kelly Arther W. A branch-current based state estimation method for distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1995; 10(1):483–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Wang Haibin, Schulz Noel N. A. revised branch current-based distribution system state estimation algorithm and meter [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. placement impact. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2004;19(1):207–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Sun Hongbin, Zhang Boming, Xiang Niande. A branch-power-based state estimation method for distribution systems. Autom Electr Power Syst 1998;22(8):12–6. in Chinese. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Deng Youman, He Ying, Zhang Boming. A branch-estimation-based state estimation method for radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2002;17(4):1057–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. P. Aruna Jeyanthy and D. Devaraj, Hybrid particle swarm optimization for multi-objective reactive power optimization with voltage stability, in: Pro-ceedings of the International Conference on Control, Communication and Power Engineering 2010, pp. 18–23, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Z. Lu and L. Ma., Power system reactive power optimization based on directneural dynamic programming in: Proceedings of 2008 3rd International Conference on Intelligent System and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE 2008), 2008, pp. 862–866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. B.P. Numbi, D.W. Juma, J.L. Munda, and A.A. Jimoh, Constraint handling approach in optimal reactive power dispatch when using unconstrained standard particle swarm optimization, in: Proceedings of the 20th Southern African Universities' Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC 2011), Cape Town, 2011, pp.7–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. A. Luce no, in: Multiple outliers detection through reweighted least deviances, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 26 (1998) 313–326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. T.-C. Cheng, in: A distribution system state estimator accommodating large number of ampere measurements, Electrical Power and Energy Systems 43(2012) 839–848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. P.J. Rousseeuw, K.Van Driessen, in: A fast algorithm for the minimum covariance determinant estimator, Technometrics 41(1999) 212–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. E. Caro, A.J. Conejo, in: State estimation via mathematical programming: a comparison of different estimation algorithms, IEE Proceedings-Generation Transmission and Distribution 6(6) (2012) 545–553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. R. Mínguez, B.G. Reguero, A.Luce no, F.J. Méndez, in: Regression models for outlier identification (hurricanes and typhoons) in wave hindcast databases, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 29 (2012) 267–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. L. Guangyi, Y. Erkeng, Y. Song, in: Novel algorithms to estimate and adaptively update measurement error variance using power system state estimation results, Electric Power Systems Research 47(1) (1998) 57–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. S. Zhong, A. Abur, in: Auto tuning of measurement weights in WLS state estimation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 19 (4) (2004) 2006–2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. R. Pires, A. Simoes Costa, L. Mili, in: Iteratively reweighted least-squares state estimation through givens rotations, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 14(4) (1999) 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. R. Jabr, B. Pal, in: Iteratively reweighted least-squares implementation of the WLAV state-estimation method, IEE Proceedings-Generation Transmission and Distribution 151 (1) (2004) 103–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. D. Wiens, in: Designs for weighted least squares regression, with estimatedweights, Statistics and Computing (2012) 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. E. Caro, A.J. Conejo, R. Mínguez, in: Power system state estimation considering measurement dependencies, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 24 (4) (2009) 1875–1885. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. E. Caro, A.J. Conejo, J. Morales, R. Mínguez, in: Calculation of measurem--ent correlations using point estimate, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 25 (4) (2010) 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Eduardo Caro, Roberto Mínguez, Antonio J. Conejo in: Robust WLS estimator using reweighting techniques for electric energy systems, Electric Power Systems Research 104 (2013) 9–17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Advanced Techniques for Fake News Detection on Twitter Using NLP and AI: A Comprehensive Review
- Review of Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate
- Performance of Local Construction Contractors – Case Study of Registered Contractors in Monrovia, Liberia
- Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Innovation Management in Multinational Organizations
- Modeling of Reaction Between Dissolved Oxygen (DO) And Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) in Degradation River