Performance Evaluation of Eco-Friendly Sucrose-BasedPlasticizer in Concrete

Concrete is one of the most widely used construction materials in the world due toitsstrength, durability, and adaptability in various structural applications. However, theproduction and use of chemical admixtures in concrete may have environmental impacts, which has encouraged researchers to explore natural and eco-friendly alternatives. Organicsucrose, a naturally available carbohydrate, has the potential to act as a plasticizer andretarding admixture used in small quantities in concrete mixtures. The present studyinvestigates the effect of organic sucrose on the workability and mechanical propertiesofconcrete. Different concrete mixes were prepared by adding varying percentages of sucrose

respect to the weight of cement. Laboratory tests such as slump test and compressivestrength test were conducted to evaluate the fresh and hardened properties of concrete. Theexperimental results indicate that the addition of a small amount of sucrose improves theworkability of concrete and slightly delays the setting time without significantly affectingitscompressive strength. The findings suggest that organic sucrose can be used as a sustainableand eco-friendly plasticizer in concrete, which may help in reducing dependency on syntheticchemical admixtures. This study highlights the potential of natural materials in developingenvironmentally responsible construction practices.

Organic sucrose, plasticizer, eco-friendly admixture, concrete, workability, sustainable construction.

1. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, andmaterials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. 3. Gambhir, M. L. (2013). Concrete technology (5th ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Concrete admixtures handbook: Properties, science, and technology (2nd ed.). Noyes Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Mindess, S., Young, J. F., & Darwin, D. (2003). Concrete (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. 6. Aïtcin, P. C. (2000). High-performance concrete. CRC Press. 7. Shetty, M. S. (2005). Concrete technology: Theory and practice. S. Chand Publishing. 8. Lea, F. M. (2004). The chemistry of cement and concrete (4th ed.). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 9. Domone, P., & Illston, J. (2010). Construction materials: Their nature and behaviour(4th ed.). Spon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 10. Kosmatka, S. H., Kerkhoff, B., & Panarese, W. C. (2002). Design and control of concrete mixtures. Portland Cement Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 11. Mehta, P. K. (2001). Reducing the environmental impact of concrete. Concrete International, 23(10), 61–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 12. Neville, A. M. (2008). Admixtures for concrete improvement. Concrete International, 30(9), 45–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 13. Malhotra, V. M. (2004). Role of admixtures in concrete technology. Cement andConcrete Research, 34(3), 437–442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 14. Taylor, H. F. W. (1997). Cement chemistry (2nd ed.). Thomas Telford Publishing. 15. Neville, A. M., & Brooks, J. J. (2010). Concrete technology (2nd ed.). PearsonEducation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 16. Mindess, S. (2014). Developments in the formulation and reinforcement of concrete. Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 17. ACI Committee 212. (2010). Chemical admixtures for concrete. American ConcreteInstitute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 18. Taylor, H. F. W. (1990). Cement hydration and its influence on concrete properties. Cement and Concrete Research, 20(5), 651–658. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 19. Gambhir, M. L. (2010). Sustainable concrete materials and technology. NewDelhi: Tata McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 20. Mehta, P. K. (1998). Greening of the concrete industry for sustainable development. Concrete International, 20(4), 61–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 21. Neville, A. M. (2002). Properties and durability of concrete. Construction andBuilding Materials, 16(2), 91–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 22. Domone, P. (2010). Advances in admixture technology for concrete. ConstructionMaterials Journal, 163(2), 77–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 23. Aïtcin, P. C. (2003). The role of superplasticizers in high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(4–5), 409–417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 24. Malhotra, V. M., & Mehta, P. K. (2005). High-performance, high-volume fly ashconcrete. Supplementary Cementing Materials. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 25. Shetty, M. S. (2012). Advanced concrete technology. S. Chand Publishing. 26. Kosmatka, S. H., & Wilson, M. L. (2011). Design and control of concrete mixtures(15th ed.). Portland Cement Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 27. Mehta, P. K., & Burrows, R. W. (2001). Building durable structures in the 21st century. Concrete International, 23(3), 57–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 28. Ramachandran, V. S., & Feldman, R. F. (2001). Science and technology of cement and admixtures. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. 29. Neville, A. M. (2012). Advances in concrete technology. Pearson Education. 30. Taylor, H. F. W. (2004). Cement hydration processes and admixture effects. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(6), 1021–1030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning
• Management of Academic Libraries and Client Satisfaction Towards Digital Utilization: Basis for Monitoring Library Operations in SOCCSKSARGEN Region.
• Revenue Leakages in TPA Insurance Claims and Corporate Claims: An Institutional Overview of Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad
• Technology and Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism: A Management Perspective
• Geospatial Distribution of Tarok Sacred Grove of Langtang North and Langtang South Local Government Areas