Personalized AI Tutor An Intelligent Adaptive Learning System for Early Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Personalized learning is increasingly gaining importance in the field of educational technology, particularly among young learners who require interactive tools and personalized content based on their learning speeds. Most learning platforms currently available offer identical content to all learners irrespective of differences in their comprehension, attention, and revision capabilities. This paper introduces an innovative AI Tutor designed for students in classes 1 to 5 by integrating adaptive learning, quizzes, speech communication, and analytical features in one application. The system uses HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Firebase Authentication, Firebase Cloud Firestore, and web browser speech recognition technologies. The learning content includes topic-specific lessons related to alphabets, numbers, shapes, colors, animals, fruits, transport, and objects. Student participation is monitored based on quiz scores, progress level, errors made, pronunciation practice, and completion status of topics. The system recommends relevant next topics for learning, modifies the practice flow, and facilitates smooth learning progression based on user data. Experimental observations indicate enhanced engagement, efficient topic tracking, and valuable personalization suggestions for early learners.
Downloads
References
E. Kochmar, D. D. Vu, R. Belfer, V. Gupta, I. V. Serban, and J. Pineau, “Automated Personalized Feedback Improves Learning Gains in an Intelligent Tutoring System,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12163, pp. 140–146, 2020.
C.-C. Lin, A. Y. Q. Huang, and O. H. T. Lu, “Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Toward Sustainable Education: A Systematic Review,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 41, pp. 1–22, 2023.
T. Adiguzel, M. H. Kaya, and F. K. Cansu, “Revolutionizing Education with AI: Exploring the Transformative Potential of ChatGPT,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. ep429, 2023.
M. F. Contrino, L. M. Oliveira, and R. T. Ferreira, “Adaptive Learning Tools and Their Impact on Student Performance and Educational Satisfaction,” Computers and Education, vol. 186, pp. 104535, 2022.
R. Sajja, S. R. Salkuti, and V. K. Pasupuleti, “Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Assistant for Personalized and Adaptive Learning Environments,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 55–69, 2024.
C. Troussas, A. Krouska, and M. Virvou, “Adaptive Learning Systems Using Artificial Intelligence and Recommendation Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2020.
J. P. Rollinson and D. M. Johnson, “Machine Learning Techniques for Student Performance Prediction,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 421–428, 2020.
T. K. Huang and C. H. Chen, “Speech Recognition Assisted Learning Systems for Interactive Education,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2451–2470, 2021.
S. Winkler and M. Söllner, “Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2018.
A. M. Fadhil and S. Villafiorita, “An Adaptive Learning with Gamification and Conversational Agents,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017.
H. Drachsler and W. Greller, “The Pulse of Learning Analytics,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2016.
J. Lester, B. Mott, S. Rowe, and J. Sabourin, “Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning Technologies,” AI Magazine, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 45–58, 2013.
B. P. Woolf, Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2010.
R. Nkambou, J. Bourdeau, and R. Mizoguchi, Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010.
V. Kumar and S. Minz, “Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics for Student Performance Evaluation,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 122, pp. 1035–1042, 2017.
D. Ifenthaler and Y. Yau, “Utilizing Learning Analytics to Support Study Success,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1961–1981, 2020.
N. Pinkwart, “Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Education,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 582–585, 2016.
A. Mitrovic, “Fifteen Years of Constraint-Based Tutors,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 22, no. 1–2, pp. 39–72, 2012.
S. D’Mello and A. Graesser, “AutoTutor and Affective Learning Technologies,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–39, 2012.
E. Alepis and M. Virvou, “Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4613–4621, 2009.
P. Brusilovsky and E. Millán, “User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Learning Systems,” The Adaptive Web, pp. 3–53, 2007.
S. Graf and Kinshuk, “Advanced Student Modeling for Adaptive Learning Systems,” International Journal of Learning Technology, vol. 4, no. 1–2, pp. 95–119, 2008.
R. S. Baker and K. Yacef, “The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009,” Journal of Educational Data Mining, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2009.
B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, and S. Lajoie, “Transforming Learning Through Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” AI Magazine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 11–24, 2010.
C. Conati and K. VanLehn, “Toward Computer-Based Support of Metacognitive Skills,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 389–415, 2000.
A. Graesser, A. Olney, B. Haynes, and J. Chipman, “AutoTutor: A Tutor with Dialogue in Natural Language,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 180–192, 2005.
P. De Bra and L. Calvi, “AHA! An Open Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture,” The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 115–139, 1998.
E. Wenger, Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
K. Chrysafiadi and M. Virvou, “Student Modeling Approaches in Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 4718–4729, 2013.
L. Guo, J. Yang, and Y. Shi, “Evolution and Trends in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Research,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2021.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.