Factors Influencing AI Tool Adoption in Research Among Junior and Senior Students of QCU College of Computer Studies

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed academic research practices, particularly in literature review, data analysis, and research writing. This study investigated the factors influencing the use of AI tools in academic research among junior and senior students of the College of Computer Studies at Quezon City University. Specifically, it examined the respondents’ demographic profile, level of AI tool utilization, factors affecting AI adoption, barriers to AI usage, and the relationship between these factors and students’ actual AI usage behavior. The study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design and utilized an online survey questionnaire administered to 130 students from the BS Information Technology, BS Information Systems, and BS Computer Science programs using stratified sampling. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and Multiple Regression Analysis were used to analyze the collected data. Findings revealed that students demonstrated a moderate level of AI tool utilization in research activities, with perceived usefulness emerging as the most influential factor affecting AI adoption. Students commonly used AI tools for idea generation, information retrieval, and writing assistance; however, AI utilization remained limited due to concerns related to plagiarism, data privacy, ethical misuse, overdependence on AI-generated outputs, and insufficient institutional support. The study also found a significant relationship between the identified adoption factors and students’ actual AI usage behavior. Overall, the findings suggest that AI tools have strong potential to improve research productivity and efficiency, but educational institutions must establish clear policies, governance frameworks, and training programs to ensure the responsible, ethical, and effective integration of AI in academic research.

Academic Research Tools, AI-Assisted Research, AI Literacy, Educational Technology, Human-Computer Interaction

1. Allen Negrosa, G. R., Pamaran, E. G., & Tabuyo, J. U. (2023). EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL MARKETING TO ONLINE FOOD SELLERS Bachelor of Science in Hotel and Restaurant Management. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 11, 296–313. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10574982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arangüena, I. (2024). AI in Research: Its Uses and Limitations. Research To Action. https://www.researchtoaction.org/author/inesresearchtoaction-org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asio, J. M. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy and academic performance of tertiary level students: A preliminary analysis. Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal), 5(2), 309–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for Second Language Writing: Pitfalls and Potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Besas, J., Patac, L., & Patac Jr., A. (2026). AI-facilitated self-directed learning and mathematics performance: A mixed-methods study on ChatGPT use among Generation Z students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. https://ijcer.net/index.php/pub/article/view/822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Besas, J., Patac, L., & Patac Jr., A. (2026). AI-facilitated self-directed learning and mathematics performance: A mixed-methods study on ChatGPT use among Generation Z students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. https://ijcer.net/index.php/pub/article/view/822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025). Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00384-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carolan, S., Martin, A., Gong, C., Borja, S., & Sonnet, C. (2025). AI’s Consumer Tipping Point Has Arrived. https://menlovc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/menlo_ventures_consumer_ai_report-2025.pdf? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Co, S. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine education: A narrative review of applications, perceptions, and challenges. International Research Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15902950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Co, S. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine education: A narrative review of applications, perceptions, and challenges. International Research Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15902950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Education. (2026). Foundational guidelines on artificial intelligence (AI) in basic education (DepEd Order No. 003, s. 2026). https://www.deped.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ellington, K. (2024). Statistical Treatment of Data Analysis - Research Methods. studocu.com.ph. Retrieved May 14, 2026, from https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/marikina-polytechnic-college/bachelor-of-industrial-technology-major-in-electronics-technology/statistical-research/111029454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Espartinez, B. (2024). Bridging the educational divide with ChatGPT’s integration in higher education: A Q-methodology study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 23, 211–241. doi.org https://www.jite.org/documents/Vol24/JITE-IIPv24Art011Espartinez11758.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Tools Usage: A structural equation modeling of undergraduates’ technological readiness, Self-Efficacy and attitudes. Journal for STEM Education Research, 8(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Falebita, O., & Kok, J. (2024). Exploring the Factors Influencing Artificial Intelligence Adoption among Gen Z University Students: the Role of Self-Efficacy and Perceived Trust. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00171-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fute, A., Oubibi, M., Amihere, A., Kangwa, D., & Msafiri, M. M. (2026). Institutional support for ethical AI adoption in higher education amid the rising trend of manuscript retractions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07235-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Giugliano, A. (2026). Best AI Tools for Academic Research in 2026: A Step-by-Step Workflow Guide. Thesify. https://www.thesify.ai/blog/best-ai-tools-academic-research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Global Scientific Journal. (2025). Ethical concerns in artificial intelligence-driven education: Perspective from educators and students. Global Scientific Journal, 13(5), 280-285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jobs for the Future. (2026) AI Usage in Education is Growing, But Gaps in Guidance Persist, New Survey Finds. Jobs for the Future (JFF). https://www.jff.org/newsroom/press-releases/ai-usage-in-education-is-growing-but-gaps-in-guidance-persist-new-survey-finds/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Khailova, L. (2025, February 2). Guides: Artificial intelligence (generative) resources: AI tools for research. Guides.library.georgetown.edu. https://guides.library.georgetown.edu/ai/tools [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5(1), 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using Artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: an essential productivity tool. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lalisan, J. M. A., Espolong, N. P., Autor, A. L., Duran, I. D. Z., Belenario, R. J. R., Palawan, C. E. O., Amba, J. C., & Salvador, R. P. (2026). Navigating artificial intelligence: Leveraging AI-powered tools to enhance academic performance of senior high school students. International Conference on Community Education and Philanthropy (ICCEPH). https://icceph.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2025b). The impact of artificial intelligence on research efficiency. Results in Engineering, 26, 104743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Martin, T. (2022). A Literature Review on The Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 2859 – 2884. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Miranda, J. P. P., et al. (2026). AI in work-based learning: Understanding the purposes and effects of intelligent tools among student interns. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28786 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Miranda, J. P. P., et al. (2026). AI in work-based learning: Understanding the purposes and effects of intelligent tools among student interns. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28786 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. OwlAiSolution. (2025). AI is constantly Improving—And that’s just the beginning. OWL AI. https://owlaisolutions.com/2025/01/13/ai-is-constantly-improving-and-thats-just-the-beginning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Patterson, R. (2024). Examining generative artificial intelligence adoption in academia: A UTAUT perspective. Issues in Information Systems, 25(3), 238–251. https://www.iacis.org/iis/2024/3_iis_2024_238-251.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Perante, W. C., et al. (2025). Utilization of artificial intelligence tools in engineering education among HEIs in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/14771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Perante, W. C., Oquino, V. H., Cidro, M. K. T., Perante, W. A., Barquin, G. M., & Gomba, F. E. (2025, November 21). Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Engineering Education among HEIs in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Perante | International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/14771? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Popović Šević, N., Šević, A., Slijepčević, M., & Krstić, J. (2025). AI adoption in higher education: Exploring attitudes and perceived benefits between users and non-users. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(4), Article e202528. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Quimba, F. M. (2026). How ready are LGUs for AI adoption? Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). https://www.pids.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. ResearchGate. (2026). The influence of artificial intelligence on higher education in the Philippines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389316597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Saflor, C. S. R. (2025). Modeling student acceptance of AI technologies in higher education: A hybrid SEM–ANN approach. Future Internet, 17(12), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17120581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Saflor, C. S. R. (2025). Modeling student acceptance of AI technologies in higher education: A hybrid SEM–ANN approach. Future Internet, 17(12), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17120581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Saif, N., et al. (2024). Integrating the adapted UTAUT model with moral obligation, trust and perceived risk to predict ChatGPT adoption for assessment support: A survey with students. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sambrano, L. C., Reyes, J. R. B., Fabro, R. B. B., Colar, C. K. F., & Medrano, V. B. (2025). The influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on library patronage among college students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(7), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90700010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Saputra, I., et al. (2023). Potential barriers, problems, and risks of utilizing artificial intelligence in education. ResearchGate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sibug, V. B., et al. (2026). Exploring the adoption intention in using AI-enabled educational tools among pre-service teachers in the Philippines. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sibug, V. B., et al. (2026). Exploring the adoption intention in using AI-enabled educational tools among pre-service teachers in the Philippines. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Stryker, C., & Kavlakoglu, E. (2026). Artificial intelligence: Autonomy, creativity, and problem solving. IBM. What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? | IBM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Taheri, R., Nazemi, N., Pennington, S. E., Clark, J. A., & Dadgostari, F. (2025). Factors influencing educators’ AI adoption: A grounded meta-analysis review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. University of California, Davis. (2024). Beyond productivity: The power of AI as an accessibility tool. Technology Impact Report 2024-2025. https://iet.ucdavis.edu/technology-impact-report-2024-2025/article/beyond-productivity-power-ai-accessibility-tool [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Villarino, R. T. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in rural Philippine higher education: Perspectives, challenges, and ethical considerations. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 23. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.10909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Villarino, R. T. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in rural Philippine higher education: Perspectives, challenges, and ethical considerations. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 23. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.10909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Welcome To Zscaler Directory Authentication. (2025). Etcor.org. https://etcor.org/storage/iJOINED/Vol.%20IV(3) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Williams, T. (2025). Integrating the adapted UTAUT model with moral obligation, trust and perceived risk to predict ChatGPT adoption for assessment support: A survey with students. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1619391. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1619391/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Xie, L., Jiang, Y., Chang, C.-N., Zeng, X.-Y., Hong, J., & Mo, F. (2025). How are faculty and college students embracing AI? — A multi-informant mixed method study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning
• Management of Academic Libraries and Client Satisfaction Towards Digital Utilization: Basis for Monitoring Library Operations in SOCCSKSARGEN Region.
• Revenue Leakages in TPA Insurance Claims and Corporate Claims: An Institutional Overview of Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad
• Technology and Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism: A Management Perspective
• Geospatial Distribution of Tarok Sacred Grove of Langtang North and Langtang South Local Government Areas