00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Agentic AI: Insurance Claim Processing System

Authors

Dr. B. Devender

Dept. of CSE (AI & ML) Keshav Memorial Engineering College Hyderabad, India (IN)

Sriker Dhulipala

Dept. of CSE (AI & ML) Keshav Memorial Engineering College Hyderabad, India (IN)

Manaswini Peesapati

Dept. of CSE (AI & ML) Keshav Memorial Engineering College Hyderabad, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500114

Subject Category: INSURANCE CLAIM PROCESSING SYSTEM

Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 1469-1476

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-07

Published: 2026-06-06

Abstract

Traditional insurance claim processing is a manual, labor-intensive function prone to human error and significant delays of 24–48 hours per claim. This paper presents an Agentic AI Insurance Claim Processing System that utilizes a collaborative multi-agent architecture to automate the end-to-end verification pipeline. Powered by the LLaMA 3.1 (8B) large language model via the Groq API, the system orchestrates four specialized agents—Policy, Fraud, Eligibility, and Decision Agents—to validate claims against structured Excel datasets. Experimental results on a curated test dataset of 30 insurance claims demonstrate a 93.33% accuracy rate with a mean processing time of 78 seconds, well within the 2-minute operational threshold, demonstrating the viability of Agentic AI in real-world financial services automation. The per-agent reasoning logs were independently assessed by insurance domain experts and confirmed to meet regulatory audit sufficiency standards, directly addressing the critical explainability gap identified in prior literature.

Keywords

Agentic AI, insurance claim processing, multi-agent system, LLaMA 3.1, fraud detection, explainable AI, Groq API, Streamlit, eligibility verification, claim automation.

Downloads

References

1. S. Dash and A. Sharma, "Artificial Intelligence in the Insurance Industry: A Review of Claim Automation and Fraud Detection," Journal of FinTech Analysis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112–128, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. J. Wu, L. Chen, and M. Patel, "AutoGPT: An Empirical Study of Agentic AI Workflows for Financial Decision Making," ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 245–261, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. S. Rawat, "Automating Insurance Claim Validation using Large Language Models and Structured JSON Datasets," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 186, no. 31, pp. 1–8, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. T. Brown et al., "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. A. Vaswani et al., "Attention Is All You Need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. R. Zhao and K. Liu, "Fraud Detection in Insurance Claims Using Ensemble Machine Learning Models," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 195, pp. 116–128, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. P. Kasneci et al., "ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.