Agentic AI: Insurance Claim Processing System
Authors
Dr. B. Devender
Dept. of CSE (AI & ML) Keshav Memorial Engineering College Hyderabad, India (IN)
Sriker Dhulipala
Dept. of CSE (AI & ML) Keshav Memorial Engineering College Hyderabad, India (IN)
Manaswini Peesapati
Dept. of CSE (AI & ML) Keshav Memorial Engineering College Hyderabad, India (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500114
Subject Category: INSURANCE CLAIM PROCESSING SYSTEM
Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 1469-1476
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-07
Published: 2026-06-06
Abstract
Traditional insurance claim processing is a manual, labor-intensive function prone to human error and significant delays of 24–48 hours per claim. This paper presents an Agentic AI Insurance Claim Processing System that utilizes a collaborative multi-agent architecture to automate the end-to-end verification pipeline. Powered by the LLaMA 3.1 (8B) large language model via the Groq API, the system orchestrates four specialized agents—Policy, Fraud, Eligibility, and Decision Agents—to validate claims against structured Excel datasets. Experimental results on a curated test dataset of 30 insurance claims demonstrate a 93.33% accuracy rate with a mean processing time of 78 seconds, well within the 2-minute operational threshold, demonstrating the viability of Agentic AI in real-world financial services automation. The per-agent reasoning logs were independently assessed by insurance domain experts and confirmed to meet regulatory audit sufficiency standards, directly addressing the critical explainability gap identified in prior literature.
Keywords
Agentic AI, insurance claim processing, multi-agent system, LLaMA 3.1, fraud detection, explainable AI, Groq API, Streamlit, eligibility verification, claim automation.
Downloads
References
1. S. Dash and A. Sharma, "Artificial Intelligence in the Insurance Industry: A Review of Claim Automation and Fraud Detection," Journal of FinTech Analysis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112–128, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. J. Wu, L. Chen, and M. Patel, "AutoGPT: An Empirical Study of Agentic AI Workflows for Financial Decision Making," ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 245–261, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. S. Rawat, "Automating Insurance Claim Validation using Large Language Models and Structured JSON Datasets," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 186, no. 31, pp. 1–8, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. T. Brown et al., "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. A. Vaswani et al., "Attention Is All You Need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. R. Zhao and K. Liu, "Fraud Detection in Insurance Claims Using Ensemble Machine Learning Models," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 195, pp. 116–128, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. P. Kasneci et al., "ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning
- Management of Academic Libraries and Client Satisfaction Towards Digital Utilization: Basis for Monitoring Library Operations in SOCCSKSARGEN Region.
- Revenue Leakages in TPA Insurance Claims and Corporate Claims: An Institutional Overview of Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad
- Technology and Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism: A Management Perspective
- Geospatial Distribution of Tarok Sacred Grove of Langtang North and Langtang South Local Government Areas