Palatability and Durability Test of Coumatetralyl Rodenticide with Various Flavors and Baits to Malayan Field Rats (Rattus tiomanicus Mill.)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Rats are wild animals that are often found in various habitats and become a nuisance in human life. Rats can cause damage and losses to crops, one of which is oil palm plantation. Therefore, control efforts are needed, one of which is chemical control using rodenticides. This study aimed to determine the level of attractiveness of Malayan field rats to various formulations of coumatetralyl-based rodenticides with cereal-based baits and with vegetable and animal flavorings. Study also conducted to measure the durability and effectiveness of these rodenticides after being exposed in the oil palm crop. The types of rodenticides used were coumatetralyl rodenticides in rice bait and rice plus wheat baits, with chocolate, pandanus, strawberry, and mealworm flavorings. This study consisted of three tests: Palatability, durability, and mealworm tests, each method lasts for three days pre-test, three days test, and fourteen days post-test. The methods used were choice test with eight treatments each for palatability and durability, and two treatments for mealworm test. Data were analyzed using a randomized block design, R Studio with Tukey's test at α = 5%. The results showed that the consumption of Malayan field rats on coumatetralyl rodenticides with flavored baits in the palatability and durability tests was not significantly different, while it was significantly different in the mealworm test. Coumatetralyl rodenticides with pandanus and chocolate flavors, with rice and rice-wheat baits, and positive control rodenticides with mealworms were more preferred by Malayan field rats than others. Further research is aimed at testing the coumatetralyl rodenticide with the best type of bait and flavoring agent for application in oil palm plantations to kill pest rats and reduce the damage they cause to oil palm fruit.
Downloads
References
Aprilia H. 2022. Penentuan jenis dan konsentrasi bahan penyedap pada umpan untuk meningkatkan palatabilitas tikus pohon (Rattus tiomanicus Mill.) [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Dhamayanti A. 2009. Kajian sosial ekonomi pengendalian tikus pohon, Rattus tiomanicus Mill. dengan burung hantu, Tyto alba pada perkebunan kelapa sawit. Strategi Perlindungan Tanaman Menghadapi Perubahan Iklim Global dan Sistem Perdagangan Bebas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Perlindungan Tanaman; 2009 Agustus 5-6; Bogor, Indonesia. Bogor. Institut Pertanian Bogor. P. 439-445; [accessed 2025 Feb 17].
Gunawan TR, Pradana MG, Yusup CA, Rozziansha TAP, Priwiratama H, and Prasetyo AE. 2024. Intensitas serangan tikus di perkebunan kelapa sawit: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur, Jambi. Warta PPKS. 29(1): 61-68. [accessed 2025 Feb 17].
Kurniati E. 2017. Uji repelensi dari serbuk daun pandan wangi (Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb) terhadap kutu beras (Sitophilus oryzae L) dan sumbangsihnya pada materi hama dan penyakit pada tanaman di Kelas VII SMP/MTs [skripsi]. Palembang: Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah.
Natawigena WD, Bari IN, and Surachman CR. 2021. Pengaruh beberapa bahan aktif dalam formulasi rodentisida terhadap metabolisme dan perilaku tikus putih (Rattus norvegicus Wistar) di laboratorium. Seminar Biodiversitas Serangga dan Perannya dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan yang Berkelanjut-an. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi 6; 2021 Jul 15; Bandung. Indonesia. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati. P. 257-277; [accessed 2025 Feb 24].
Ngidha SA, Tarmadjaya S, and Kristalisasi EN. 2016. Uji efektivitas beberapa macam rodentisida terhadap pengendalian tikus. Jurnal Agromast. 1(2): 1-9. [accessed 2025 Feb 17].
Posmaningsih DAA, Purna IN, and Sali IW. 2014. Efektivitas pemanfaatan umbi gadung (Dioscorea hispida Dennust) pada umpan sebagai rodentisida nabati pengendalian tikus. Jurnal Skala Husada. 11(1): 79-85. [accessed 2025 Mar 10].
Priyambodo S. 2006. Tikus. In Sigit SH dan Hadi UK (editor) Hama Permukim- an Indonesia. Unit Kajian Pengendalian Hama Permukiman, FKH, IPB, Bogor. P. 195 - 258.
Priyambodo S. 2009. Pengendalian Hama Tikus Terpadu. Penerbit Penebar Swa- daya, Jakarta. 135 p.
Purbaningsih VC and Widyanto A. 2018. Deskripsi jumlah dan spesies tikus di Desa Banjarpanen Kecamatan Sumpiuh Kabupaten Banyumas. Kesling- mas. 38(4): 305-364. [accessed 2025 Feb 13].
Saipullah and Iskarlia GR. 2018. Pengendalian hama tikus pada tanaman kelapa sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) fase tanaman menghasilkan (TM) di PT Hasnur Citra Terpadu. Jurnal Sains dan Terapan Politeknik Hasnur. 6(1): 6-12. [accessed 2025 Feb 17].
Subiantara A, Hakim AR, Diana R, Wijaya NC, Yusuf M, and Arianti S. 2022. Analisis kerugian serangan hama tikus di perkebunan kelapa sawit (case study at PT. Sakti Mait Jaya Langit). Green Economy dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Universitas PGRI Palangka Raya 2022; 2022 Jul 12-13; Palangka Raya. Indonesia. Palangka Raya: Universitas PGRI Palangka Raya. P. 63-73; [accessed 2025 Feb 13].
Zailani HF, Sutjipto, and Prastowo S. 2015. Uji efektivitas rodentisida ekstrak buah bintaro (Cerbera manghas Boiteau, Pierre L.) terhadap hama tikus. Berkah Ilmiah Pertanian. 10(10): P. 1-5. [accessed 2025 Maret 10]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.