Comparative Analysis of Web Design Performance: AI‑Assisted Tools Versus Traditional Figma‑Based Design

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Janua Leah B. Panes
Joanalyn B. Nuñez
John Harold D. Timtiman
Mark Lanzer D. Malinao
Shena R. Delos Reyes
Harold R. Lucero

This study compared the performance of traditional Figma workflows and AI-assisted Figma workflows in developing high-fidelity UI/UX prototypes among BSIT students of Quezon City University during the Academic Year 2025–2026. Using a descriptive-comparative within-subjects design, the study evaluated both workflows in terms of Design Quality (Functional Suitability, Usability, and Performance Efficiency) and Creative Output (Creative Autonomy, Innovation, and Ease of Workflow). Data were collected from 60 purposively selected respondents through a researcher-developed questionnaire and analyzed using weighted mean, standard deviation, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, and Spearman’s Rank-Order Correlation. Results showed that both workflows received positive evaluations; however, the traditional Figma workflow consistently obtained higher ratings. Significant differences were found in Functional Suitability, Usability, and Creative Autonomy, favoring the traditional workflow, while no significant differences were identified in Performance Efficiency, Innovation, and Ease of Workflow. Strong positive correlations were also observed between Design Quality and Creative Output in both workflows. The findings suggest that while AI-assisted tools improve workflow efficiency and convenience, traditional Figma workflows remain more effective in supporting usability, functional accuracy, and creative control. The study concludes that AI-assisted design tools are most effective when used as complementary technologies alongside human creativity and manual design expertise.

Comparative Analysis of Web Design Performance: AI‑Assisted Tools Versus Traditional Figma‑Based Design. (2026). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 15(5), 1639-1652. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500130

Downloads

References

H. P. S. M. F. I. Ghorban Tanhaei, "Predictive analytics in customer behavior: Anticipating trends and preferences," vol. 17, 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000924

O. N. Akande, H. B. Akande, E. O. Asani and B. T. Dautare, "Customer Segmentation through RFM Analysis and K-means Clustering: Leveraging Data-Driven Insights for Effective Marketing Strategy," 2024. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10630052/

S. R. &. L. Vuyyuru, "Unlocking future consumer insights: Using predictive analytics and AI to shape proactive retail strategies," European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, p. 110–115, 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5283693

J. Tang, "Unlocking Retail insights: predictive modeling and customer segmentation through data analytics," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 2, no. 20, p. 59, 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/0718-1876/20/2/59

R. K. &. N. N. Koppichetti, " Customer Retention with Predictive Analytics in the Retail Industry," International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, vol. 03, p. 776, 2022. https://repository.rsis.international/ijrias/11/1/predictive-sales-and-inventory-system-with-customer-segmentation-for-enhance-customer-relationship-management-5918

M. Z. Rodriguez et al., "Clustering algorithms: A comparative approach," PLoS One, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210236

A. R. Mendoza, "POINT OF SALE SYSTEM WITH INVENTORY FOR ARM’S FOOD AND DELICACIES," International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1371, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Louie-Agustin/publication/337707746_POINT_OF_SALE_SYSTEM_WITH_INVENTORY_FOR_ARM'S_FOOD_AND_DELICACIES/links/5de653e2a6fdcc2837010d26/POINT-OF-SALE-SYSTEM-WITH-INVENTORY-FOR-ARMS-FOOD-AND-DELICACIES.pdf

Kamnerddee, C., Putjorn, P., & Intarasirisawat, J. (2024). AI-Driven Design Thinking: A Comparative Study of Human-Created and AI-Generated UI Prototypes for Mobile Applications. 2024 8th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/InCIT63192.2024.10810565

Dahibhate, Y. (2021). A Study on the Intersection of AI and Human Creativity. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5945094

Fu, Y., Zhou, T., Allen, P. G., Chen, Y., Wobbrock, J. O., & Hiniker, A. (2024). Creativity in the Age of AI: Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Design Outputs and Designers’ Creative Thinking. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00168

Akça, Y. K. (n.d.). GENERATIVE AI IN THE UX/UI DESIGN PROCESS: DEFINING KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR DESIGNER-CENTERED TOOLS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/119032

Priefer, D., Rost, W., Strüber, D., Taentzer, G., & Kneisel, P. (2021). Applying MDD in the content management system domain: Scenarios, tooling, and a mixed-method empirical assessment. Software and Systems Modeling, 20(6), 1919–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00872-3

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=83L2EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA18&dq=Field,+A.+(2018).+Discovering+Statistics+Using+IBM+SPSS+Statistics+(5th+ed.).+SAGE+Publications.+&ots=UbPYFrFOCG&sig=J7Lr-jazguWApIUeYUujQjtVc3g

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1977-25733-001

Fu, X., et al. (2024). The impact of generative AI on the creative process: Authorial identity and satisfaction. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642452

Mustafa, A. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on UX design: Efficiency vs. creativity. Journal of Applied UX Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371842858_The_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_on_UX_Design

Namoun, A., & Alanezi, A. (2024). Evaluating user interface quality and user satisfaction in the age of generative AI. IEEE Access. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10363228

Ngo, L., Ranabhat, R., & LAB University of Applied Sciences. (2025). UI design in the era of AI [Thesis].https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/908915/Ngo_Ranabhat.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Article Details

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Web Design Performance: AI‑Assisted Tools Versus Traditional Figma‑Based Design. (2026). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 15(5), 1639-1652. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500130